• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用Hugo™机器人辅助手术系统进行胆囊切除术:韩国首例普通外科临床研究。

Cholecystectomy with the Hugo™ robotic-assisted surgery system: the first general surgery clinical study in Korea.

作者信息

Kwon Wooil, Jang Jin-Young, Jeong Chang Wook, Anselme Sylvain, Pradella Fabio, Woods Jacklyn

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2025 Jan;39(1):171-179. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11334-4. Epub 2024 Oct 28.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-024-11334-4
PMID:39466427
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11666616/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Hugo™ Robotic-Assisted Surgery (RAS) System is an emergent device in the robotic surgery field. This study aims to describe the first general surgery-focused clinical study in Korea using the novel Hugo™ RAS System.

METHODS

This study was a prospective, single-center, single-arm, confirmatory clinical study conducted at Seoul National University Hospital where 20 cholecystectomies were performed. To evaluate the safety and performance of the Hugo™ RAS System the incidence of conversion to laparoscopy or open surgery, major complication (Clavien-Dindo Grade ≥ III) rate, overall complication rate, readmission rate, and reoperation rate were evaluated. All parameters were assessed within 30 days post-procedure. Any device deficiencies encountered during our initial experience and device data such as setup, console, and operative times were also reported.

RESULTS

We confirmed that our trial achieved the primary objective with a success rate of at least 95%. This was accomplished with no conversions to other types of surgery due to serious system malfunction and with only one major complication within 24 h post-procedure. The 20 consecutively enrolled patients had a median age and BMI of 58 years old and 23.9 kg/m, respectively. The major complication rate was 10% (2/20 patients), the overall complication rate was 15% (3/20 patients), the readmission rate was 15% (3/20 patients), and the reoperation rate was 0% (0/20 patients). None of the complications were definitively device related. The median setup, console, and operative times were 16, 17, and 55 min, respectively. The device deficiency rate was 15% (3/20 patients), but all device deficiencies were minor, occurred before the first incision, and did not present a risk to the patient.

CONCLUSION

Based on our initial experience with the Hugo™ RAS System, cholecystectomy is feasible and safe. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05715827).

摘要

背景

雨果™机器人辅助手术(RAS)系统是机器人手术领域的一种新兴设备。本研究旨在描述韩国首例以普通外科为重点、使用新型雨果™RAS系统的临床研究。

方法

本研究是一项在首尔国立大学医院进行的前瞻性、单中心、单臂验证性临床研究,共进行了20例胆囊切除术。为评估雨果™RAS系统的安全性和性能,评估了转为腹腔镜手术或开放手术的发生率、主要并发症(Clavien-Dindo分级≥III级)发生率、总体并发症发生率、再入院率和再次手术率。所有参数均在术后30天内进行评估。还报告了我们初次使用该设备时遇到的任何设备缺陷以及诸如设置、控制台和手术时间等设备数据。

结果

我们确认我们的试验达到了主要目标,成功率至少为95%。这一目标的实现是因为没有因严重系统故障而转为其他类型的手术,且术后24小时内仅有一例主要并发症。连续入组的20例患者的中位年龄和BMI分别为58岁和23.9kg/m²。主要并发症发生率为10%(2/20例患者),总体并发症发生率为15%(3/20例患者),再入院率为15%(3/20例患者),再次手术率为0%(0/20例患者)。所有并发症均与设备无明确关联。设置、控制台和手术时间的中位数分别为16分钟、17分钟和55分钟。设备缺陷率为15%(3/20例患者),但所有设备缺陷均较轻微,发生在首次切口之前,且未对患者构成风险。

结论

基于我们对雨果™RAS系统的初步经验,胆囊切除术是可行且安全的。本试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(NCT05715827)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e21e/11666616/d2a191fa67b7/464_2024_11334_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e21e/11666616/f5c294b0bddc/464_2024_11334_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e21e/11666616/d2a191fa67b7/464_2024_11334_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e21e/11666616/f5c294b0bddc/464_2024_11334_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e21e/11666616/d2a191fa67b7/464_2024_11334_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Cholecystectomy with the Hugo™ robotic-assisted surgery system: the first general surgery clinical study in Korea.使用Hugo™机器人辅助手术系统进行胆囊切除术:韩国首例普通外科临床研究。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jan;39(1):171-179. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11334-4. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
2
Implementation of a Robotic Surgical Program With the Dexter Robotic Surgery System: Initial Experiences in Cholecystectomy.使用德克斯特机器人手术系统实施机器人手术项目:胆囊切除术的初步经验
World J Surg. 2025 May;49(5):1221-1227. doi: 10.1002/wjs.12531. Epub 2025 Mar 23.
3
Outcomes of robotic surgery for inflammatory bowel disease using the Medtronic Hugo™ Robotic-Assisted Surgical platform: a single center experience.使用美敦力 Hugo™ 机器人辅助手术平台进行机器人手术治疗炎症性肠病的结果:单中心经验。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2024 Oct 10;39(1):158. doi: 10.1007/s00384-024-04736-2.
4
Robotic versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for difficult gallbladders: an observational study of tertiary centre cases.针对复杂胆囊的机器人辅助与腹腔镜胆囊切除术:一项对三级中心病例的观察性研究
Surg Endosc. 2025 May;39(5):2958-2963. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11586-8. Epub 2025 Mar 20.
5
Utility guideline and considerations for the novel Hugo™ RAS (robotic-assisted surgery) system in colorectal surgery: surgical outcomes and initial experience in a tertiary center.新型 Hugo™ RAS(机器人辅助手术)系统在结直肠手术中的应用指南和注意事项:三级中心的手术结果和初步经验。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2024 Sep 18;39(1):144. doi: 10.1007/s00384-024-04715-7.
6
Robotic compared with laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program comparative analysis.机器人辅助与腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较:一项国家外科质量改进计划的对比分析。
Surgery. 2025 Feb;178:108772. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.08.006. Epub 2024 Sep 13.
7
Full robotic cholecystectomy: first worldwide experiences with HUGO RAS surgical platform.全机器人胆囊切除术:HUGO RAS 手术平台的全球首次临床应用经验。
ANZ J Surg. 2024 Mar;94(3):387-390. doi: 10.1111/ans.18784. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
8
A retrospective comparison of robotic cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: operative outcomes and cost analysis.机器人胆囊切除术与腹腔镜胆囊切除术的回顾性比较:手术结果与成本分析
Surg Endosc. 2017 Mar;31(3):1436-1441. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5134-0. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
9
Robotics-assisted surgery in gynecology: A single-center experience with the Hugo™ RAS system in India.妇科机器人辅助手术:印度使用Hugo™机器人辅助手术系统的单中心经验。
Womens Health (Lond). 2025 Jan-Dec;21:17455057241302581. doi: 10.1177/17455057241302581.
10
Safety of robotic cholecystectomy as index training procedure: the UK experience.机器人胆囊切除术作为培训指标的安全性:英国经验。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Sep;38(9):4880-4886. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11006-3. Epub 2024 Jul 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Application of the Hugo™ RAS robotic system in general surgery: a scoping review.雨果™ RAS机器人系统在普通外科手术中的应用:一项范围综述。
J Robot Surg. 2025 Jun 14;19(1):289. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02468-1.
2
Based on bibliometric visual analysis, the current status and development trends of research on complications after cholecystectomy.基于文献计量可视化分析的胆囊切除术后并发症研究现状与发展趋势
Front Surg. 2025 May 16;12:1586139. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1586139. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Global, regional, and national burden of gallbladder and biliary diseases from 1990 to 2019.1990年至2019年全球、区域和国家胆囊及胆道疾病负担
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Nov 27;15(11):2564-2578. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i11.2564.
2
A retrospective study of laparoscopic, robotic-assisted, and open emergent/urgent cholecystectomy based on the PINC AI Healthcare Database 2017-2020.基于 PINC AI Healthcare Database 2017-2020 的腹腔镜、机器人辅助和开放性紧急/紧急胆囊切除术的回顾性研究。
World J Emerg Surg. 2023 Nov 30;18(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s13017-023-00521-8.
3
Full robotic cholecystectomy: first worldwide experiences with HUGO RAS surgical platform.
全机器人胆囊切除术:HUGO RAS 手术平台的全球首次临床应用经验。
ANZ J Surg. 2024 Mar;94(3):387-390. doi: 10.1111/ans.18784. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
4
Safety and Feasibility of Cholecystectomy with the Hugo RAS: Proof of Setup Guides and First-In-Human German Experience.使用雨果机器人辅助手术系统进行胆囊切除术的安全性和可行性:设置指南验证及德国首例人体经验
Visc Med. 2023 Aug;39(3-4):76-86. doi: 10.1159/000531595. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
5
Comparative Safety of Robotic-Assisted vs Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.机器人辅助与腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较安全性。
JAMA Surg. 2023 Dec 1;158(12):1303-1310. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.4389.
6
Systematic review: robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic multiport cholecystectomy.系统评价:机器人辅助与传统腹腔镜多孔胆囊切除术的比较。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Oct;17(5):1967-1977. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01662-3. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
7
Robot-assisted cholecystectomy with the new HUGO™ robotic-assisted system: first worldwide report with system description, docking settings, and video.使用新型HUGO™机器人辅助系统进行机器人辅助胆囊切除术:全球首例报告,包括系统描述、对接设置及视频
Updates Surg. 2023 Oct;75(7):2039-2042. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01553-0. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
8
National analysis of cost disparities in robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic abdominal operations.全国范围内对机器人辅助与腹腔镜腹部手术的成本差异进行分析。
Surgery. 2023 Jun;173(6):1340-1345. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.02.016. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
9
Chronological trends in patients undergoing cholecystectomy in Korea: a nationwide health insurance claims study.韩国胆囊切除术患者的时间趋势:一项全国性医疗保险理赔研究。
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2022 Apr;102(4):205-213. doi: 10.4174/astr.2022.102.4.205. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
10
Cholecystectomy using the Revo-i robotic surgical system from Korea: the first clinical study.韩国的 Revo-i 机器人手术系统行胆囊切除术:初步临床研究。
Updates Surg. 2021 Jun;73(3):1029-1035. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00877-5. Epub 2020 Sep 16.