• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

请回到原始资料!

Go back to the original sources please!

机构信息

Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University Singapore, National Healthcare Group, Singapore, Singapore.

Wilson Centre for Research in Education, Division of General Internal Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Department of Medicine, University Health Network, University of Toronto, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2024 Nov;29(5):1545-1548. doi: 10.1007/s10459-024-10388-2.

DOI:10.1007/s10459-024-10388-2
PMID:39470858
Abstract

This column is intended to address the kinds of knotty problems and dilemmas with which many scholars grapple in studying health professions education. In this article, we address the dilemma of engaging with foundational works versus depending on summary articles. We argue that an over-dependence on secondary sources can lead to prejudices and unquestioned assumptions, and limit the constructive development of our field. We urge health professions education scholars to honour the original literature not just for their own learning and understanding, but so that the field can move forward in developing theory and methodology.

摘要

本专栏旨在探讨许多学者在研究健康职业教育时所面临的棘手问题和困境。在本文中,我们探讨了与基础作品接轨与依赖综述文章之间的困境。我们认为,过度依赖二手资料可能导致偏见和未经质疑的假设,并限制我们领域的建设性发展。我们敦促健康职业教育学者不仅为了自己的学习和理解,也要为了使该领域在发展理论和方法方面取得进展,尊重原始文献。

相似文献

1
Go back to the original sources please!请回到原始资料!
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2024 Nov;29(5):1545-1548. doi: 10.1007/s10459-024-10388-2.
2
Should I do a synthesis (i.e. literature review)?我是否应该做一个综合(即文献综述)?
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2024 May;29(2):367-370. doi: 10.1007/s10459-024-10335-1.
3
Who should proof my paper?谁应该校对我的论文?
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2024 Jul;29(3):721-723. doi: 10.1007/s10459-024-10352-0.
4
Avoiding common pitfalls in mixed methods research?避免混合方法研究中的常见陷阱?
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2024 Sep;29(4):1071-1073. doi: 10.1007/s10459-024-10362-y.
5
How should I determine author order for this paper?我应该如何确定这篇论文的作者顺序?
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2023 Dec;28(5):1367-1369. doi: 10.1007/s10459-023-10308-w.
6
Who should be an author on this paper?谁应该成为这篇论文的作者?
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2023 Aug;28(3):665-668. doi: 10.1007/s10459-023-10256-5.
7
Questions and Quandaries: How to respond to reviewer comments.问题与疑惑:如何回复审稿人的意见
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2023 Mar;28(1):7-12. doi: 10.1007/s10459-023-10213-2. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
8
My paper has been rejected without review. What do I do now?我的论文未经评审就被拒稿了。我现在该怎么办?
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2023 May;28(2):323-326. doi: 10.1007/s10459-023-10234-x. Epub 2023 May 4.
9
I'd like to use a questionnaire (sub-text: this will be an easy way to get data. Right?).我想用问卷(副标题:这将是获取数据的一种简单方式。对吧?)。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2024 Mar;29(1):5-7. doi: 10.1007/s10459-024-10321-7.
10
Systematic review of the use of debates in health professions education - does it work?对卫生专业教育中辩论运用情况的系统评价——它有效吗?
GMS J Med Educ. 2019 Aug 15;36(4):Doc37. doi: 10.3205/zma001245. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Qualitative Methods for Medical Education Research.医学教育研究的定性方法
PRiMER. 2025 Jul 11;9:35. doi: 10.22454/PRiMER.2025.865981. eCollection 2025.