Suppr超能文献

作者身份和公民科学:七个启发式规则。

Authorship and Citizen Science: Seven Heuristic Rules.

机构信息

Department of Crop Production Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7043, 75651, Uppsala, Sweden.

Department of Applied Animal Science and Welfare, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

Sci Eng Ethics. 2024 Oct 29;30(6):53. doi: 10.1007/s11948-024-00516-x.

Abstract

Citizen science (CS) is an umbrella term for research with a significant amount of contributions from volunteers. Those volunteers can occupy a hybrid role, being both 'researcher' and 'subject' at the same time. This has repercussions for questions about responsibility and credit, e.g. pertaining to the issue of authorship. In this paper, we first review some existing guidelines for authorship and their applicability to CS. Second, we assess the claim that the guidelines from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), known as 'the Vancouver guidelines', may lead to exclusion of deserving citizen scientists as authors. We maintain that the idea of including citizen scientists as authors is supported by at least two arguments: transparency and fairness. Third, we argue that it might be plausible to include groups as authors in CS. Fourth and finally, we offer a heuristic list of seven recommendations to be considered when deciding about whom to include as an author of a CS publication.

摘要

公民科学(CS)是一个总称,指的是有大量志愿者参与的研究。这些志愿者可以同时扮演“研究人员”和“研究对象”这两种混合角色。这对责任和信用等问题产生了影响,例如与作者身份问题有关。在本文中,我们首先回顾了一些现有的作者身份准则及其在 CS 中的适用性。其次,我们评估了一种说法,即医学期刊编辑国际委员会(ICMJE)制定的“温哥华准则”可能导致有资格的公民科学家被排除在作者身份之外。我们认为,将公民科学家纳入作者身份的想法至少有两个论据的支持:透明度和公平性。第三,我们认为在 CS 中纳入群体作为作者是合理的。第四,也是最后,我们提出了一个启发式的七点建议清单,在决定将谁纳入 CS 出版物的作者时应予以考虑。

相似文献

9
Interventions to reduce corruption in the health sector.减少卫生部门腐败现象的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 16;2016(8):CD008856. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008856.pub2.
10
Electric fans for reducing adverse health impacts in heatwaves.用于减少热浪期间不良健康影响的电风扇。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jul 11;2012(7):CD009888. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009888.pub2.

本文引用的文献

2
Women are credited less in science than men.女性在科学领域的贡献被低估了,相比男性而言。
Nature. 2022 Aug;608(7921):135-145. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04966-w. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
4
Authorship Protocols Must Change to Credit Citizen Scientists.作者协议必须改变,以认可公民科学家的贡献。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2020 Mar;35(3):187-190. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2019.10.007. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
8
Misuse of Coauthorship in Medical Theses in Sweden.瑞典医学论文中共同署名的滥用情况。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2018 Oct;13(4):402-411. doi: 10.1177/1556264618784206. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
9
Scientific authorship, pluralism, and practice.科学著作权、多元化和实践。
Account Res. 2018;25(4):199-211. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2018.1437347. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
10
Responsibility for scientific misconduct in collaborative papers.合作论文中科研不端行为的责任。
Med Health Care Philos. 2018 Sep;21(3):423-430. doi: 10.1007/s11019-017-9817-7.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验