Department of Crop Production Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7043, 75651, Uppsala, Sweden.
Department of Applied Animal Science and Welfare, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2024 Oct 29;30(6):53. doi: 10.1007/s11948-024-00516-x.
Citizen science (CS) is an umbrella term for research with a significant amount of contributions from volunteers. Those volunteers can occupy a hybrid role, being both 'researcher' and 'subject' at the same time. This has repercussions for questions about responsibility and credit, e.g. pertaining to the issue of authorship. In this paper, we first review some existing guidelines for authorship and their applicability to CS. Second, we assess the claim that the guidelines from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), known as 'the Vancouver guidelines', may lead to exclusion of deserving citizen scientists as authors. We maintain that the idea of including citizen scientists as authors is supported by at least two arguments: transparency and fairness. Third, we argue that it might be plausible to include groups as authors in CS. Fourth and finally, we offer a heuristic list of seven recommendations to be considered when deciding about whom to include as an author of a CS publication.
公民科学(CS)是一个总称,指的是有大量志愿者参与的研究。这些志愿者可以同时扮演“研究人员”和“研究对象”这两种混合角色。这对责任和信用等问题产生了影响,例如与作者身份问题有关。在本文中,我们首先回顾了一些现有的作者身份准则及其在 CS 中的适用性。其次,我们评估了一种说法,即医学期刊编辑国际委员会(ICMJE)制定的“温哥华准则”可能导致有资格的公民科学家被排除在作者身份之外。我们认为,将公民科学家纳入作者身份的想法至少有两个论据的支持:透明度和公平性。第三,我们认为在 CS 中纳入群体作为作者是合理的。第四,也是最后,我们提出了一个启发式的七点建议清单,在决定将谁纳入 CS 出版物的作者时应予以考虑。