Suppr超能文献

作者身份和公民科学:七个启发式规则。

Authorship and Citizen Science: Seven Heuristic Rules.

机构信息

Department of Crop Production Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7043, 75651, Uppsala, Sweden.

Department of Applied Animal Science and Welfare, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

Sci Eng Ethics. 2024 Oct 29;30(6):53. doi: 10.1007/s11948-024-00516-x.

Abstract

Citizen science (CS) is an umbrella term for research with a significant amount of contributions from volunteers. Those volunteers can occupy a hybrid role, being both 'researcher' and 'subject' at the same time. This has repercussions for questions about responsibility and credit, e.g. pertaining to the issue of authorship. In this paper, we first review some existing guidelines for authorship and their applicability to CS. Second, we assess the claim that the guidelines from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), known as 'the Vancouver guidelines', may lead to exclusion of deserving citizen scientists as authors. We maintain that the idea of including citizen scientists as authors is supported by at least two arguments: transparency and fairness. Third, we argue that it might be plausible to include groups as authors in CS. Fourth and finally, we offer a heuristic list of seven recommendations to be considered when deciding about whom to include as an author of a CS publication.

摘要

公民科学(CS)是一个总称,指的是有大量志愿者参与的研究。这些志愿者可以同时扮演“研究人员”和“研究对象”这两种混合角色。这对责任和信用等问题产生了影响,例如与作者身份问题有关。在本文中,我们首先回顾了一些现有的作者身份准则及其在 CS 中的适用性。其次,我们评估了一种说法,即医学期刊编辑国际委员会(ICMJE)制定的“温哥华准则”可能导致有资格的公民科学家被排除在作者身份之外。我们认为,将公民科学家纳入作者身份的想法至少有两个论据的支持:透明度和公平性。第三,我们认为在 CS 中纳入群体作为作者是合理的。第四,也是最后,我们提出了一个启发式的七点建议清单,在决定将谁纳入 CS 出版物的作者时应予以考虑。

相似文献

1
Authorship and Citizen Science: Seven Heuristic Rules.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2024 Oct 29;30(6):53. doi: 10.1007/s11948-024-00516-x.
2
Interventions to prevent misconduct and promote integrity in research and publication.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 4;4(4):MR000038. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000038.pub2.
3
Author guidelines in medical journals: Essential rules and rationale.
Adv Clin Exp Med. 2025 Jun;34(6):861-869. doi: 10.17219/acem/205025.
6
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
8
Psychological interventions for adults who have sexually offended or are at risk of offending.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12(12):CD007507. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007507.pub2.
9
Interventions to reduce corruption in the health sector.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 16;2016(8):CD008856. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008856.pub2.
10
Electric fans for reducing adverse health impacts in heatwaves.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jul 11;2012(7):CD009888. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009888.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
The People's Review protocol: planning an innovative study powered by the public.
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Mar 25;11(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00682-7.

本文引用的文献

2
Women are credited less in science than men.
Nature. 2022 Aug;608(7921):135-145. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04966-w. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
4
Authorship Protocols Must Change to Credit Citizen Scientists.
Trends Ecol Evol. 2020 Mar;35(3):187-190. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2019.10.007. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
5
Institutional Review Board Oversight of Citizen Science Research Involving Human Subjects.
Am J Bioeth. 2019 Aug;19(8):21-23. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2019.1619864.
6
EternaBrain: Automated RNA design through move sets and strategies from an Internet-scale RNA videogame.
PLoS Comput Biol. 2019 Jun 27;15(6):e1007059. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007059. eCollection 2019 Jun.
7
Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories.
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 16;14(1):e0198117. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198117. eCollection 2019.
8
Misuse of Coauthorship in Medical Theses in Sweden.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2018 Oct;13(4):402-411. doi: 10.1177/1556264618784206. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
9
Scientific authorship, pluralism, and practice.
Account Res. 2018;25(4):199-211. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2018.1437347. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
10
Responsibility for scientific misconduct in collaborative papers.
Med Health Care Philos. 2018 Sep;21(3):423-430. doi: 10.1007/s11019-017-9817-7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验