• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

受绿色能源技术材料影响的选定社会影响指标。

Selected social impact indicators influenced by materials for green energy technologies.

作者信息

Rahimpour Saeed, El-Wali Mohammad, Makarava Iryna, Tuomisto Hanna L, Lundström Mari, Kraslawski Andrzej

机构信息

Hydrometallurgy and Corrosion, Circular Raw Materials Hub, Department of Chemical and Metallurgical Engineering (CMET), School of Chemical Engineering, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.

School of Engineering Science, Industrial Engineering and Management (IEM), LUT University, Lappeenranta, Finland.

出版信息

Nat Commun. 2024 Oct 29;15(1):9336. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-53652-0.

DOI:10.1038/s41467-024-53652-0
PMID:39472564
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11522319/
Abstract

The social risks of green energy transition are underexplored. One of the important questions is which materials used in green energy technologies offer the greatest social benefits, such as ensuring decent living conditions, and which pose the most social risks. To address this issue, we develop a dynamic material-energy flow model integrating system dynamics, social life cycle assessment, and geometallurgical approaches. The analysis focuses on critical materials: Rare Earth Elements, Nickel, Silicon, Graphite, Magnesium, Gallium, Germanium, Indium, Aluminum, Cobalt, Lithium, Zinc, and Tellurium used in wind turbines, electric vehicles, lithium-ion batteries and solar photovoltaic panels. We assess their social impact on work safety, gender equality, informal employment, labor income share, employment rate, and child labor-key issues addressed by Sustainable Development Goals 1, 5, and 8. Here we show that Aluminum production for electric vehicles, wind turbines and solar photovoltaic panels generates the most jobs and income opportunities, while extraction of Cobalt, Lithium, Silicon, and Zinc carry the highest social risks.

摘要

绿色能源转型的社会风险尚未得到充分探讨。一个重要问题是,绿色能源技术中使用的哪些材料能带来最大的社会效益,比如确保体面的生活条件,而哪些材料带来的社会风险最大。为解决这个问题,我们开发了一个动态物质-能量流模型,整合了系统动力学、社会生命周期评估和地质冶金方法。分析聚焦于关键材料:用于风力涡轮机、电动汽车、锂离子电池和太阳能光伏板的稀土元素、镍、硅、石墨、镁、镓、锗、铟、铝、钴、锂、锌和碲。我们评估它们对工作安全、性别平等、非正规就业、劳动收入份额、就业率和童工等方面的社会影响——这些是可持续发展目标1、5和8所涉及的关键问题。我们在此表明,电动汽车、风力涡轮机和太阳能光伏板的铝生产创造了最多的就业和收入机会,而钴、锂、硅和锌的开采带来的社会风险最高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3fe/11522319/810e57b998d7/41467_2024_53652_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3fe/11522319/af2aec692e8e/41467_2024_53652_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3fe/11522319/b7921bf16107/41467_2024_53652_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3fe/11522319/5aa6e028921c/41467_2024_53652_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3fe/11522319/d8e2eab2f4c6/41467_2024_53652_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3fe/11522319/810e57b998d7/41467_2024_53652_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3fe/11522319/af2aec692e8e/41467_2024_53652_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3fe/11522319/b7921bf16107/41467_2024_53652_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3fe/11522319/5aa6e028921c/41467_2024_53652_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3fe/11522319/d8e2eab2f4c6/41467_2024_53652_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3fe/11522319/810e57b998d7/41467_2024_53652_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Selected social impact indicators influenced by materials for green energy technologies.受绿色能源技术材料影响的选定社会影响指标。
Nat Commun. 2024 Oct 29;15(1):9336. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-53652-0.
2
Global environmental cost of using rare earth elements in green energy technologies.绿色能源技术中使用稀土元素的全球环境成本。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Aug 1;832:155022. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155022. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
3
Global material flow analysis of end-of-life of lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxide batteries from battery electric vehicles.全球电动汽车用锂镍锰钴氧化物电池报废后的物质流分析。
Waste Manag Res. 2023 Feb;41(2):376-388. doi: 10.1177/0734242X221127175. Epub 2022 Nov 12.
4
Endangered elements, critical raw materials and conflict minerals.濒危元素、关键原材料和冲突矿物。
Sci Prog. 2019 Dec;102(4):304-350. doi: 10.1177/0036850419884873. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
5
Cobalt recycling patents dataset selected using 'green' classification codes: Focus on the nickel manganese cobalt (NMC) batteries recycling.使用“绿色”分类代码选择的钴回收专利数据集:聚焦于镍锰钴(NMC)电池回收。
Data Brief. 2024 Mar 13;54:110320. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2024.110320. eCollection 2024 Jun.
6
Coordination Chemistry-Driven Approaches to Rare Earth Element Separations.配位化学驱动的稀土元素分离方法。
Acc Chem Res. 2022 Sep 20;55(18):2616-2627. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.2c00312. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
7
Circularity of Lithium-Ion Battery Materials in Electric Vehicles.锂离子电池材料在电动汽车中的循环利用。
Environ Sci Technol. 2021 Apr 20;55(8):5189-5198. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c07030. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
8
Forecasting demand data for critical materials.关键材料的需求数据预测。
Data Brief. 2024 Oct 9;57:111013. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2024.111013. eCollection 2024 Dec.
9
Doping Effects on Ternary Cathode Materials for Lithium-Ion Batteries: A Review.掺杂对锂离子电池三元正极材料的影响:综述
Chemphyschem. 2024 Sep 2;25(17):e202300966. doi: 10.1002/cphc.202300966. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
10
Circular economy strategies for mitigating metals shortages in electric vehicle batteries under China's carbon-neutral target.在实现中国碳中和目标的背景下,缓解电动汽车电池金属短缺的循环经济策略。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Feb 14;352:120079. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120079. Epub 2024 Jan 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Steering artificial photosynthesis via photoinduced conversion of monometallic to bimetallic sites in FeCo nitroprussides.通过光诱导将铁钴硝普盐中的单金属位点转化为双金属位点来调控人工光合作用。
Nat Commun. 2025 Jul 4;16(1):6160. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-61129-x.
2
Comparative analysis of public and expert perceptions of electrified vehicles in the European Union.欧盟公众与专家对电动汽车看法的比较分析。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):21695. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06071-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Analogical environmental cost assessment of silicon flows used in solar panels by the US and China.美国和中国对太阳能电池板中硅流的类比环境成本评估。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 25;14(1):9538. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-60270-9.
2
Statistical analysis of the severity of occupational accidents in the mining sector.矿业职业事故严重程度的统计分析。
J Safety Res. 2023 Sep;86:364-375. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2023.07.015. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
3
Global environmental cost of using rare earth elements in green energy technologies.绿色能源技术中使用稀土元素的全球环境成本。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Aug 1;832:155022. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155022. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
4
Life Cycle Assessment studies of rare earths production - Findings from a systematic review.稀土生产的生命周期评估研究——系统评价的结果。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Oct 15;791:148257. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148257. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
5
A critical review on environmental impacts of renewable energy systems and mitigation strategies: Wind, hydro, biomass and geothermal.可再生能源系统环境影响及缓解策略的批判性回顾:风能、水能、生物质能和地热能。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Apr 20;766:144505. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144505. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
6
The social and environmental complexities of extracting energy transition metals.提取能源转型金属的社会和环境复杂性。
Nat Commun. 2020 Sep 24;11(1):4823. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18661-9.