Suppr超能文献

类风湿关节炎放射学进展的评估。一项随机对照试验。

Assessment of radiologic progression in rheumatoid arthritis. A randomized, controlled trial.

作者信息

Fries J F, Bloch D A, Sharp J T, McShane D J, Spitz P, Bluhm G B, Forrester D, Genant H, Gofton P, Richman S

出版信息

Arthritis Rheum. 1986 Jan;29(1):1-9. doi: 10.1002/art.1780290101.

Abstract

Radiologic assessment of progressive joint destruction in rheumatoid arthritis is generally considered to be the ultimate standard for evaluation of treatment. We compared alternative radiologic techniques by performing a randomized, controlled trial in which hand films of rheumatoid arthritis patients were read by several skilled observes. The number of joints evaluated (34 versus 18) was found to make relatively little difference, but the number of readers and their experience level was critical. Films should be read in pairs. Joint space narrowing and erosion scores were shown to contribute independent information. Use of recommended techniques can reduce the number of patients required and, thus, can reduce the cost of a clinical trial by more than half and can substantially increase the sensitivity and efficiency of a trial. Therefore, critical selection of the method of assessing study endpoint is of great importance.

摘要

类风湿关节炎中进行性关节破坏的放射学评估通常被认为是治疗评估的最终标准。我们通过开展一项随机对照试验比较了不同的放射学技术,在该试验中,类风湿关节炎患者的手部X光片由几位技术熟练的观察者阅片。发现所评估关节的数量(34个对18个)差异相对较小,但阅片者的数量及其经验水平至关重要。X光片应成对阅片。关节间隙变窄和侵蚀评分显示可提供独立信息。使用推荐技术可减少所需患者数量,从而可将临床试验成本降低一半以上,并可大幅提高试验的敏感性和效率。因此,对评估研究终点方法进行严格选择非常重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验