• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会情感属性在加强人机协作中的作用。

The role of socio-emotional attributes in enhancing human-AI collaboration.

作者信息

Kolomaznik Michal, Petrik Vladimir, Slama Michal, Jurik Vojtech

机构信息

Czech University of Life Science, Prague, Czechia.

University of Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czechia.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 15;15:1369957. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1369957. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1369957
PMID:39474095
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11518774/
Abstract

This article delves into the dynamics of human interaction with artificial intelligence (AI), emphasizing the optimization of these interactions to enhance human productivity. Employing a Grounded Theory Literature Review (GTLR) methodology, the study systematically identifies and analyzes themes from literature published between 2018 and 2023. Data were collected primarily from the Scopus database, with the Web of Science used to corroborate findings and include additional sources identified through a snowball effect. At the heart of this exploration is the pivotal role of socio-emotional attributes such as trust, empathy, rapport, user engagement, and anthropomorphization-elements crucial for the successful integration of AI into human activities. By conducting a comprehensive review of existing literature and incorporating case studies, this study illuminates how AI systems can be designed and employed to foster deeper trust and empathetic understanding between humans and machines. The analysis reveals that when AI systems are attuned to human emotional and cognitive needs, there is a marked improvement in collaborative efficiency and productivity. Furthermore, the paper discusses the ethical implications and potential societal impacts of fostering such human-AI relationships. It argues for a paradigm shift in AI development-from focusing predominantly on technical proficiency to embracing a more holistic approach that values the socio-emotional aspects of human-AI interaction. This shift could pave the way for more meaningful and productive collaborations between humans and AI, ultimately leading to advancements that are both technologically innovative and human-centric.

摘要

本文深入探讨了人类与人工智能(AI)交互的动态过程,强调优化这些交互以提高人类生产力。该研究采用扎根理论文献综述(GTLR)方法,系统地识别和分析了2018年至2023年间发表的文献中的主题。数据主要从Scopus数据库收集,使用科学网来证实研究结果,并纳入通过滚雪球效应识别出的其他来源。此次探索的核心是社会情感属性的关键作用,如信任、同理心、融洽关系、用户参与度和拟人化——这些元素对于将人工智能成功整合到人类活动中至关重要。通过对现有文献进行全面综述并纳入案例研究,本研究阐明了如何设计和应用人工智能系统,以促进人类与机器之间更深层次的信任和同理心理解。分析表明,当人工智能系统适应人类的情感和认知需求时,协作效率和生产力会有显著提高。此外,本文还讨论了建立这种人机关系的伦理意义和潜在的社会影响。它主张人工智能发展的范式转变——从主要关注技术熟练度转向采用更全面的方法,重视人机交互的社会情感方面。这一转变可能为人类与人工智能之间更有意义和富有成效的合作铺平道路,最终带来技术创新和以人为本的进步。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2ef/11518774/7cc52251e92d/fpsyg-15-1369957-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2ef/11518774/af4aeb38dac9/fpsyg-15-1369957-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2ef/11518774/7cc52251e92d/fpsyg-15-1369957-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2ef/11518774/af4aeb38dac9/fpsyg-15-1369957-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2ef/11518774/7cc52251e92d/fpsyg-15-1369957-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The role of socio-emotional attributes in enhancing human-AI collaboration.社会情感属性在加强人机协作中的作用。
Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 15;15:1369957. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1369957. eCollection 2024.
2
Integrating artificial intelligence to assess emotions in learning environments: a systematic literature review.整合人工智能以评估学习环境中的情绪:一项系统的文献综述。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 19;15:1387089. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1387089. eCollection 2024.
3
Artificial intelligence technologies and compassion in healthcare: A systematic scoping review.医疗保健中的人工智能技术与人文关怀:一项系统综述。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 17;13:971044. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.971044. eCollection 2022.
4
Beyond algorithms: The human touch machine-generated titles for enhancing click-through rates on social media.超越算法:社交媒体上提高点击率的人机生成标题的人性化触摸。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 12;19(7):e0306639. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306639. eCollection 2024.
5
Exploring emotional intelligence in artificial intelligence systems: a comprehensive analysis of emotion recognition and response mechanisms.探索人工智能系统中的情商:对情感识别与反应机制的全面分析。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024 Jun 21;86(8):4657-4663. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002315. eCollection 2024 Aug.
6
The human-centric Industry 5.0 collaboration architecture.以人类为中心的工业5.0协作架构。
MethodsX. 2023 Jun 15;11:102260. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2023.102260. eCollection 2023 Dec.
7
Understanding the factors influencing acceptability of AI in medical imaging domains among healthcare professionals: A scoping review.理解医疗保健专业人员对医学影像领域中 AI 可接受性的影响因素:范围综述。
Artif Intell Med. 2024 Jan;147:102698. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2023.102698. Epub 2023 Nov 9.
8
Existing Barriers Faced by and Future Design Recommendations for Direct-to-Consumer Health Care Artificial Intelligence Apps: Scoping Review.直接面向消费者的医疗保健人工智能应用程序所面临的现有障碍和未来设计建议:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Dec 18;25:e50342. doi: 10.2196/50342.
9
What makes AI 'intelligent' and 'caring'? Exploring affect and relationality across three sites of intelligence and care.人工智能的“智能”和“关怀”体现在何处?跨越智能和关怀的三个领域探索情感和关系。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 May;277:113874. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113874. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
10
Large Language Models and User Trust: Consequence of Self-Referential Learning Loop and the Deskilling of Health Care Professionals.大语言模型与用户信任:自我参照学习循环的后果及医疗保健专业人员的技能退化
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Apr 25;26:e56764. doi: 10.2196/56764.

引用本文的文献

1
Cyber-Creativity: A Decalogue of Research Challenges.网络创造力:研究挑战十诫
J Intell. 2025 Aug 13;13(8):103. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence13080103.
2
AI Personalization and Its Influence on Online Gamblers' Behavior.人工智能个性化及其对在线赌博者行为的影响。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jun 4;15(6):779. doi: 10.3390/bs15060779.
3
Evidence-Based Analysis of AI Chatbots in Oncology Patient Education: Implications for Trust, Perceived Realness, and Misinformation Management.肿瘤患者教育中人工智能聊天机器人的循证分析:对信任、感知真实性和错误信息管理的影响

本文引用的文献

1
Situated language learning via interactive narratives.通过交互式叙事进行情境语言学习。
Patterns (N Y). 2021 Sep 10;2(9):100316. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2021.100316.
2
User Experiences of Social Support From Companion Chatbots in Everyday Contexts: Thematic Analysis.日常情境中陪伴聊天机器人提供社会支持的用户体验:主题分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Mar 6;22(3):e16235. doi: 10.2196/16235.
3
AI4People-An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations.《人工智能造福人类——良好人工智能社会的伦理框架:机遇、风险、原则与建议》
J Cancer Educ. 2025 Feb 18. doi: 10.1007/s13187-025-02592-4.
Minds Mach (Dordr). 2018;28(4):689-707. doi: 10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
4
Should Machines Express Sympathy and Empathy? Experiments with a Health Advice Chatbot.机器应该表达同情和同理心吗?健康咨询聊天机器人的实验。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2018 Oct;21(10):625-636. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2018.0110.
5
Delivering Cognitive Behavior Therapy to Young Adults With Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety Using a Fully Automated Conversational Agent (Woebot): A Randomized Controlled Trial.使用全自动对话代理(Woebot)为有抑郁和焦虑症状的年轻人提供认知行为疗法:一项随机对照试验。
JMIR Ment Health. 2017 Jun 6;4(2):e19. doi: 10.2196/mental.7785.
6
Venturing into the uncanny valley of mind-The influence of mind attribution on the acceptance of human-like characters in a virtual reality setting.探索心理的恐怖谷——心理归因对虚拟现实环境中类人角色接受度的影响。
Cognition. 2017 Mar;160:43-50. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.12.010. Epub 2016 Dec 30.
7
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.《不确定性下的判断:启发式与偏差》
Science. 1974 Sep 27;185(4157):1124-31. doi: 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124.
8
A measure of emotional empathy.一种情感共鸣的度量。
J Pers. 1972 Dec;40(4):525-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1972.tb00078.x.