Wippold Guillermo M, Wong Dylan, Garcia Kaylyn A, Crichlow Zion, Frary Sarah Grace, Mote Thrisha, Griffith Derek M
Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, 29208, USA.
School of Nursing and Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, USA.
Transl Behav Med. 2025 Jan 16;15(1). doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibae060.
Barbershop-based efforts to promote health among Black men have been uniquely successful. Despite the success of these efforts, the emphasis on outcomes as opposed to how these outcomes can be achieved has created a gap in the literature. The present study addresses this gap by describing implementation-related program priorities that Black men identify for barbershop-based interventions. Twenty-three Black men participated in implementation premortem activities. Participants were: (i) given details about a barbershop-based health promotion effort, (ii) told that the effort had failed, and (iii) were asked to identify potential sources of program failure and strategies to overcome those challenges. The frequency of program priorities was calculated based on the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment (EPIS) Framework, and focus group data were analyzed using an inductive thematic qualitative data analytic approach. Data analyses occurred in three phases: (i) excerpts were grouped by Phase, Domain, and Construct of the EPIS Framework; (ii) themes within each excerpt were then identified using an inductive approach; and (iii) themes were organized into conceptually similar and parsimonious categories. Participants suggested that the biggest source of program failure was that more attention needed to be paid to Program Fit during the Implementation Phase. Participants reported concerns with the accessibility and convenience of the effort. Additional participant concerns included economic issues, community ownership, climate, staffing processes, cultural sensitivity, engagement, and trust. The implementation of health promotion programs for Black men should pay particular attention to how the intervention fits the needs, lives, and contexts of potential participants.
基于理发店开展的促进黑人男性健康的工作取得了独特的成功。尽管这些努力取得了成功,但对结果的强调而非如何实现这些结果,在文献中造成了一个空白。本研究通过描述黑人男性为基于理发店的干预措施确定的与实施相关的项目优先事项,来填补这一空白。23名黑人男性参与了实施前评估活动。参与者被给予:(i)关于一项基于理发店的健康促进工作的详细信息,(ii)被告知该工作失败了,以及(iii)被要求确定项目失败的潜在原因和克服这些挑战的策略。根据探索、准备、实施和维持(EPIS)框架计算项目优先事项的频率,并使用归纳主题定性数据分析方法分析焦点小组数据。数据分析分三个阶段进行:(i)摘录按EPIS框架的阶段、领域和构建进行分组;(ii)然后使用归纳方法确定每个摘录中的主题;(iii)将主题组织成概念上相似且简洁的类别。参与者认为项目失败的最大原因是在实施阶段需要更多地关注项目适配性。参与者报告了对该工作的可及性和便利性的担忧。参与者的其他担忧包括经济问题、社区所有权、气候、人员配备流程、文化敏感性、参与度和信任。为黑人男性实施健康促进项目应特别关注干预措施如何符合潜在参与者的需求、生活和背景。