• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伤害登记数据对政策制定、住院和死亡率的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析的方案。

Effects of Injury Registry Data on Policy Making, Hospitalizations, and Mortality: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Department of Preventive Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Oct 30;13:e55029. doi: 10.2196/55029.

DOI:10.2196/55029
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Initiated in 2021, a Brazilian project aims to establish a national injury registry, compiling comprehensive data on events and individuals across the country, irrespective of injury severity. The registry integrates information from prehospital and hospital care, diverse health systems lacking interoperability, and sectors such as firefighters and the police. Its primary goal is to enhance health surveillance by providing timely, high-quality information, guiding prevention strategies, and informing policy making. The project still aims to reduce long-term morbidity and mortality associated with injuries.

OBJECTIVE

A knowledge gap remains regarding the effects of injury registries in relation to policies and injury outcomes. This protocol outlines a systematic review and meta-analysis to answer "What is the effect of implementation and use of injury registry data on policy making, hospitalization, and mortality?"

METHODS

The systematic review follows PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, focusing on studies reporting results related to the implementation and use of injury registries, including trauma registries. Outcomes of interest include policy making, hospitalization rates or duration, and mortality. Registries within well-defined administrative boundaries will be included. Data will be collected from PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Lilacs, and references. Records will be independently screened by 2 reviewers, with any disagreements resolved through arbitration by a third reviewer. Homogeneous studies, with 3 or more evaluating the same outcome, may undergo meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses by registry type, injury groups, and other selected variables of interest will be conducted. Sensitivity analysis, risk of bias assessment, publication bias evaluation, and quality appraisal will also be performed.

RESULTS

This systematic review will run from November 2023 to June 2024. No identical review was found. Search strategies were finalized, the bibliographic search started, duplicates were eliminated, and title and abstract screening began. Of 35 studies retrieved, 85 were excluded due to duplication, leaving 50 for selection.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is timely, aligning with ongoing national efforts to implement an injury registry. By synthesizing available evidence, we will identify the potential of injury registries to guide the decisions of Brazilian policy makers.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42023481528; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=481528.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/55029.

摘要

背景

巴西于 2021 年启动了一个项目,旨在建立一个全国性的伤害登记处,汇集全国范围内各类事件和个体的综合数据,无论伤害严重程度如何。该登记处整合了来自院前和医院护理、缺乏互操作性的不同卫生系统以及消防员和警察等部门的信息。其主要目标是通过提供及时、高质量的信息来加强健康监测,指导预防策略,并为决策提供信息。该项目仍旨在降低与伤害相关的长期发病率和死亡率。

目的

关于伤害登记处与政策和伤害结果之间的影响,仍存在知识空白。本方案概述了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以回答“实施和使用伤害登记处数据对政策制定、住院和死亡率有何影响?”

方法

系统评价遵循 PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指南,重点关注报告与伤害登记处(包括创伤登记处)的实施和使用相关结果的研究。感兴趣的结果包括政策制定、住院率或住院时间以及死亡率。将纳入在明确界定的行政边界内的登记处。将从 PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Web of Science、Lilacs 和参考文献中收集数据。记录将由 2 名审查员独立筛选,任何分歧将通过第三名审查员的仲裁解决。具有 3 项或更多项评估同一结果的同质研究可能会进行荟萃分析。还将进行按登记处类型、伤害组和其他选定感兴趣变量的亚组分析。将进行敏感性分析、偏倚风险评估、发表偏倚评估和质量评估。

结果

本系统评价将于 2023 年 11 月至 2024 年 6 月进行。没有发现相同的审查。已确定搜索策略,开始了文献搜索,消除了重复项,并开始了标题和摘要筛选。从 35 项检索到的研究中,由于重复,有 85 项被排除,只剩下 50 项进行选择。

结论

这项研究是及时的,与巴西正在进行的实施伤害登记处的国家努力保持一致。通过综合现有证据,我们将确定伤害登记处指导巴西政策制定者决策的潜力。

试验注册

PROSPERO CRD42023481528; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=481528。

国际注册报告标识符(IRRID):PRR1-10.2196/55029。

相似文献

1
Effects of Injury Registry Data on Policy Making, Hospitalizations, and Mortality: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.伤害登记数据对政策制定、住院和死亡率的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析的方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Oct 30;13:e55029. doi: 10.2196/55029.
2
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
3
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
4
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
5
Remote Digital Health Interventions to Support the Physical, Functional, or Psychological Rehabilitation of Adult Patients With Major Traumatic Injuries: Protocol for a Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.支持重度创伤成年患者身体、功能或心理康复的远程数字健康干预措施:随机对照试验系统评价方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jul 28;14:e67675. doi: 10.2196/67675.
6
Interventions to improve safe and effective medicines use by consumers: an overview of systematic reviews.改善消费者安全有效用药的干预措施:系统评价概述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 29;2014(4):CD007768. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007768.pub3.
7
Strategies for enhancing the implementation of school-based policies or practices targeting risk factors for chronic disease.加强针对慢性病风险因素的校本政策或实践实施的策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 29;11(11):CD011677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011677.pub2.
8
Interventions for preventing and reducing the use of physical restraints for older people in all long-term care settings.预防和减少所有长期护理环境中老年人使用身体约束的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 28;7(7):CD007546. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007546.pub3.
9
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
10
Implementation strategies for WHO guidelines to prevent, detect, and treat postpartum hemorrhage.世界卫生组织预防、诊断和治疗产后出血指南的实施策略
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Feb 26;2(2):CD016223. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD016223.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of Injury Registry Data on Policymaking, Hospitalizations, and Mortality: Systematic Review.伤害登记数据对政策制定、住院率和死亡率的影响:系统评价
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2025 Sep 10;11:e67115. doi: 10.2196/67115.

本文引用的文献

1
Concepts, utilization, and perspectives on the Dutch Nationwide Trauma registry: a position paper.荷兰全国创伤登记处的概念、利用和观点:立场文件。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Aug;49(4):1619-1626. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-02206-4. Epub 2023 Jan 9.
2
Trauma Registry Data as a Policy-Making Tool: A Systematic Review on the Research Dimensions.创伤登记数据作为政策制定工具:关于研究维度的系统评价
Bull Emerg Trauma. 2022 Apr;10(2):49-58. doi: 10.30476/BEAT.2021.91755.1286.
3
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.
PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
4
Factors contributing to successful trauma registry implementation in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review.中低收入国家成功实施创伤登记的影响因素:一项系统综述。
Injury. 2018 Dec;49(12):2100-2110. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.10.007. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
5
Data Integation Process: an information management model for multiple databases on traffic accidents in Brazil.数据整合过程:巴西交通事故多数据库的信息管理模型
Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2018 Jun 28;27(2):e2017160. doi: 10.5123/S1679-49742018000200018.
6
Impact of Trauma System Structure on Injury Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.创伤系统结构对损伤结局的影响:一项系统评价与Meta分析
World J Surg. 2018 May;42(5):1327-1339. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4292-0.
7
Mortality and years of life lost by interpersonal violence and self-harm: in Brazil and Brazilian states: analysis of the estimates of the Global Burden of Disease Study, 1990 and 2015.人际暴力和自残导致的死亡率及寿命损失年数:巴西及巴西各州情况:1990年和2015年全球疾病负担研究估计数分析
Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2017 May;20Suppl 01(Suppl 01):142-156. doi: 10.1590/1980-5497201700050012.
8
Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews.Rayyan——一款用于系统评价的网络和移动应用程序。
Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 5;5(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4.
9
ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions.ROBINS-I:一种评估干预性非随机研究偏倚风险的工具。
BMJ. 2016 Oct 12;355:i4919. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4919.
10
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation.系统评价和荟萃分析议定书的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015:详细说明和解释。
BMJ. 2015 Jan 2;350:g7647. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7647.