• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伤害登记数据对政策制定、住院率和死亡率的影响:系统评价

Effects of Injury Registry Data on Policymaking, Hospitalizations, and Mortality: Systematic Review.

作者信息

Medeiros-de-Souza Ana Cláudia, Sinhori Lopes Luana Emanuelly, Felicissimo Gomes de Souza Bandeira Tayna, Reis Correia Lucas, Bandeira de Sá Naiza Nayla, Zocca de Oliveira Bruno

机构信息

Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, 755 Comendador Elias Jafet Street, L1 Floor, Room 134, São Paulo, 05653-000, Brazil.

Department of Preventive Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2025 Sep 10;11:e67115. doi: 10.2196/67115.

DOI:10.2196/67115
PMID:40929579
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12422531/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Brazilian project, launched in 2021, aims to establish a nationwide injury registry that systematically collects detailed information on incidents and individuals across the country, regardless of injury severity. The registry integrates information from prehospital and hospital care, various health systems lacking interoperability, and data from sectors such as firefighters and police. Its primary aim is to enhance health surveillance by providing timely, high-quality information that guides prevention strategies and informs policymaking. In addition, the project seeks to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with injuries.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the effects of injury registry data on policymaking, hospitalization rates or duration, and mortality.

METHODS

The systematic review followed PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, with a protocol registered in PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, CRD42023481528). A total of 5 databases were searched in November 2023, with an update conducted in March 2024, incorporating reference lists from the studies included. Two reviewers independently screened records, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, resolving disagreements with a third reviewer. Studies were eligible if they reported results related to the implementation and use of injury or trauma registry data for at least one outcome of interest, while those based on other sources were excluded. Synthesis of findings was presented in tables, and the observed results were reported as number or percentage differences.

RESULTS

Out of 9100 studies retrieved, 3951 were excluded due to duplication, leaving 5149 for selection, with 15 full texts reviewed. Only 5 studies met the inclusion criteria, highlighting a notable scarcity of research on the effects or results of registry data on injury outcomes. It is important to note that the studies included reflect correlations rather than causalities, and there are currently no publications on impact. The findings suggest that injury and trauma registries have the potential to inform policymaking, which can lead to enhanced health outcomes. One study noted a 3-day reduction in intensive care unit stay (from 16 to 13 days; P<.05) and a 4% reduction in expected hospital mortality (from 17.5% to 21.5%) for patients with an Injury Severity Score ≥16, while another showed a 42% annual decrease in traffic injury hospital admissions (from 45 to 16). Significant methodological heterogeneity and the small number of studies limited the feasibility of a meta-analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Establishing an injury registry in Brazil presents a significant opportunity to enhance health outcomes through informed policymaking. While it is crucial to set appropriate expectations regarding its effects on morbidity and mortality, particularly concerning the causality and transportability of the findings to the Brazilian context, its role in facilitating preventive measures and improving surveillance capabilities remains valuable.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1ec/12422531/e3e657ada82c/publichealth-v11-e67115-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1ec/12422531/e3e657ada82c/publichealth-v11-e67115-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1ec/12422531/e3e657ada82c/publichealth-v11-e67115-g001.jpg
摘要

背景

巴西于2021年启动的项目旨在建立一个全国性伤害登记系统,该系统能系统地收集全国范围内有关事故及个人的详细信息,无论伤害严重程度如何。该登记系统整合了院前和医院护理的信息、缺乏互操作性的各种卫生系统以及消防员和警察等部门的数据。其主要目标是通过提供及时、高质量的信息来加强健康监测,这些信息可指导预防策略并为政策制定提供依据。此外,该项目旨在降低与伤害相关的发病率和死亡率。

目的

本研究旨在调查伤害登记数据对政策制定、住院率或住院时长以及死亡率的影响。

方法

本系统评价遵循PRISMA(系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目)指南,研究方案已在PROSPERO(国际系统评价前瞻性注册库,CRD42023481528)中注册。2023年11月共检索了5个数据库,并于2024年3月进行了更新,纳入了所纳入研究的参考文献列表。两名评审员独立筛选记录、提取数据,并使用纽卡斯尔 - 渥太华量表评估方法学质量,如有分歧则与第三名评审员协商解决。若研究报告了与伤害或创伤登记数据的实施和使用相关的至少一项感兴趣结果,则该研究符合纳入标准,而基于其他来源的研究则被排除。研究结果以表格形式呈现,观察结果以数值或百分比差异报告。

结果

在检索到的9100项研究中,3951项因重复而被排除,剩余5149项供筛选,其中15篇全文被评审。只有5项研究符合纳入标准,这凸显了关于登记数据对伤害结果的影响或结果的研究明显匮乏。需要注意的是,所纳入的研究反映的是相关性而非因果关系,目前尚无关于影响的出版物。研究结果表明,伤害和创伤登记系统有潜力为政策制定提供信息,进而改善健康结果。一项研究指出,对于损伤严重程度评分≥16的患者,重症监护病房住院时间缩短了3天(从16天降至13天;P<0.05),预期医院死亡率降低了4%(从17.5%降至21.5%),而另一项研究显示交通伤住院人数每年下降42%(从45例降至16例)。显著的方法学异质性和研究数量较少限制了Meta分析的可行性。

结论

在巴西建立伤害登记系统为通过明智的政策制定改善健康结果提供了重大机遇。虽然对于其对发病率和死亡率的影响设定适当预期至关重要,特别是关于研究结果在巴西背景下的因果关系和可转移性,但它在促进预防措施和提高监测能力方面的作用仍然很有价值。

相似文献

1
Effects of Injury Registry Data on Policymaking, Hospitalizations, and Mortality: Systematic Review.伤害登记数据对政策制定、住院率和死亡率的影响:系统评价
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2025 Sep 10;11:e67115. doi: 10.2196/67115.
2
Effects of Injury Registry Data on Policy Making, Hospitalizations, and Mortality: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.伤害登记数据对政策制定、住院和死亡率的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析的方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Oct 30;13:e55029. doi: 10.2196/55029.
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
5
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
6
Reducing unplanned hospital admissions from care homes: a systematic review.减少养老院的非计划性住院:系统评价。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Oct;11(18):1-130. doi: 10.3310/KLPW6338.
7
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
8
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
9
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
10
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of Injury Registry Data on Policy Making, Hospitalizations, and Mortality: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.伤害登记数据对政策制定、住院和死亡率的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析的方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Oct 30;13:e55029. doi: 10.2196/55029.
2
Concepts, utilization, and perspectives on the Dutch Nationwide Trauma registry: a position paper.荷兰全国创伤登记处的概念、利用和观点:立场文件。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Aug;49(4):1619-1626. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-02206-4. Epub 2023 Jan 9.
3
Trauma Registry Data as a Policy-Making Tool: A Systematic Review on the Research Dimensions.
创伤登记数据作为政策制定工具:关于研究维度的系统评价
Bull Emerg Trauma. 2022 Apr;10(2):49-58. doi: 10.30476/BEAT.2021.91755.1286.
4
Predictors of pre-hospital vs. hospital mortality due to road traffic injuries in an Iranian population: results from Tabriz integrated road traffic injury registry.伊朗人群因道路交通伤害导致的院前与院内死亡的预测因素:来自大不里士综合道路交通伤害登记处的结果。
BMC Emerg Med. 2022 Mar 8;22(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12873-022-00593-w.
5
An evaluation of the representativeness of a national spinal cord injury registry: a population-based cohort study.一项国家脊髓损伤登记处代表性的评估:基于人群的队列研究。
Spinal Cord. 2021 Oct;59(10):1072-1078. doi: 10.1038/s41393-021-00622-8. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
6
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
7
PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 解释和说明:系统评价报告的更新指南和范例。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n160. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n160.
8
The impact of trauma systems on patient outcomes.创伤系统对患者预后的影响。
Curr Probl Surg. 2021 Jan;58(1):100849. doi: 10.1016/j.cpsurg.2020.100849. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
9
Factors contributing to successful trauma registry implementation in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review.中低收入国家成功实施创伤登记的影响因素:一项系统综述。
Injury. 2018 Dec;49(12):2100-2110. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.10.007. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
10
Target Validity and the Hierarchy of Study Designs.目标有效性与研究设计的层次结构。
Am J Epidemiol. 2019 Feb 1;188(2):438-443. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwy228.