Eyüboğlu Tan Fırat, Armağan Efe, Temel Ayşe Nur, Özcan Mutlu
Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul Medipol University, Atatürk Bulvari, No: 27, 34083, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Clinic of Masticatory Disorders and Dental Biomaterials, Center for Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Plattenstrasse 11, CH-8032, Zurich, Switzerland.
Odontology. 2025 Apr;113(2):734-741. doi: 10.1007/s10266-024-01017-w. Epub 2024 Oct 30.
The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of different irrigation regimens on the dentin wettability of root canal sealers. The occlusal surfaces of human molar teeth (N = 90) were removed, polished, and divided into three groups (n = 30) based on the irrigation regimen: control group (SAL), standard irrigation group (NES), and test group (ODC). Each group was randomly divided into three subgroups according to the root canal sealer: AH Plus (AHP), Total Fill BC Sealer HiFlow (TOT), and OdneFill (ODF). The contact angle was determined using the sessile drop technique. The pendant droplet method assessed the work of adhesion. Surface roughness was measured using atomic force microscopy. Data were analyzed using non-parametric tests (p < .05). ODC-ODF showed significantly lower contact angle (34.80°) than ODC-AHP (66.53°, p < .001) and ODC-TOT (85.72°, p < .001). In NES, no significant difference was found between ODF and AHP (p > .05) while both groups presented significantly lower results than TOT (p < .001, p < .001, respectively). In SAL, the difference between TOT (92.84°) and AHP (83.24°) was insignificant (p > .05), whereas ODF presented significantly lower results compared to both (p < .001, p < .001, respectively). Surface roughness was lowest in ODC (31.54 nm), followed by SAL (62.30 nm) and NES (72.02 nms) which was significantly (p = 0.006) higher than ODC, whereas the difference between SAL and NES was insignificant (p > .05). This study highlights the wettability of a new root canal sealer and the effect of a new irrigation activation system on the wettability of different root canal sealers. OdneFill showed superior wettability compared to other sealers while exhibiting a synergistic effect with OdneClean.
本研究的目的是比较不同冲洗方案对根管封闭剂牙本质润湿性的影响。去除人类磨牙(N = 90)的咬合面,进行抛光,并根据冲洗方案分为三组(n = 30):对照组(SAL)、标准冲洗组(NES)和试验组(ODC)。每组根据根管封闭剂随机分为三个亚组:AH Plus(AHP)、Total Fill BC Sealer HiFlow(TOT)和OdneFill(ODF)。使用静滴法测定接触角。悬滴法评估粘附功。使用原子力显微镜测量表面粗糙度。数据采用非参数检验进行分析(p < 0.05)。ODC-ODF的接触角(34.80°)显著低于ODC-AHP(66.53°,p < 0.001)和ODC-TOT(85.72°,p < 0.001)。在NES组中,ODF和AHP之间未发现显著差异(p > 0.05),而两组的结果均显著低于TOT(分别为p < 0.001,p < 0.001)。在SAL组中,TOT(92.84°)和AHP(83.24°)之间的差异不显著(p > 0.05),而ODF与两者相比结果均显著更低(分别为p < 0.001,p < 0.001)。表面粗糙度在ODC组最低(31.54 nm),其次是SAL组(62.30 nm)和NES组(72.02 nm),NES组显著高于ODC组(p = 0.006),而SAL组和NES组之间的差异不显著(p > 0.05)。本研究强调了一种新型根管封闭剂的润湿性以及一种新型冲洗激活系统对不同根管封闭剂润湿性的影响。与其他封闭剂相比,OdneFill表现出卓越的润湿性,同时与OdneClean具有协同效应。