• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

教授与大学生学习过程中的沟通质量。

Quality of Communication Between Professors and University Students in the Process of Learning.

机构信息

Professor of Department of Stomatologic Sciences, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goiás, GO, Brazil.

Professor of post-graduate course, People Management Course (PECEGE Institute), University of São Paulo-Esalq, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Braz Dent J. 2024 Oct 28;35:e246081. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440202406081. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1590/0103-6440202406081
PMID:39476052
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11520509/
Abstract

Teaching requires the incorporation of communication skills, and these potentials may affect the outcomes of the learning process. This study evaluated the quality of communication between professors and students during the process of learning Dentistry. A questionnaire was developed and applied to evaluate their perceptions about their communications in an undergraduate Dentistry course. The questionnaire had ten items to analyze professors' self-perception and ten for students' perceptions, using a Likert-like scale and a final open question. During its construction, it was sent to five specialists to analyze content validity. The open question gathered suggestions to improve and intensify communications effectively and to identify vulnerabilities. Total scores ranged from 10 to 50, with 10 as the worst perception, and 50, as the best. The scores were calculated by adding all answers and then dividing that sum by the total number of items. Cronbach's alpha was calculated to evaluate the instrument's internal consistency. The level of significance was set at 0.05%. The Student t-test was used to determine differences between groups. Professors' self-perceptions and students' perceptions of the quality of communication of the university teaching staff during the student's learning process had statistically significant differences. Professors classified their ability to communicate when emitting and receiving information as satisfactory. Students, however, did not fully agree with them, particularly on the items about receiving information. The perceptions identified in this study may lead to a new direction in the communicative behavior of professors and students.

摘要

教学需要融入沟通技巧,而这些潜力可能会影响学习过程的结果。本研究评估了教授在学习牙科学过程中与学生之间沟通的质量。开发了一份问卷,用于评估他们在本科牙科学课程中的沟通感知。问卷有十个项目用于分析教授的自我感知,十个项目用于分析学生的感知,使用类似李克特的量表和一个最终的开放式问题。在构建过程中,将其发送给五名专家进行内容有效性分析。开放式问题收集了有关有效改善和加强沟通以及识别弱点的建议。总分为 10 到 50 分,10 分为最差感知,50 分为最佳感知。得分通过将所有答案相加,然后将总和除以总项目数来计算。计算克朗巴赫的 α 值以评估工具的内部一致性。显著性水平设置为 0.05%。使用学生 t 检验确定组间差异。教授对其在学生学习过程中传授和接收信息的沟通能力的自我感知与学生对大学教职员工教学沟通质量的感知存在统计学差异。教授们认为他们的沟通能力是令人满意的,但学生们并不完全认同,尤其是在关于接收信息的项目上。本研究中确定的感知可能会导致教授和学生的沟通行为朝着一个新的方向发展。

相似文献

1
Quality of Communication Between Professors and University Students in the Process of Learning.教授与大学生学习过程中的沟通质量。
Braz Dent J. 2024 Oct 28;35:e246081. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440202406081. eCollection 2024.
2
Dental students' perceptions of learning communication skills in a forum theatre-style teaching session on breaking bad news.牙科学生对在关于传达坏消息的论坛剧场式教学课程中学习沟通技巧的看法。
Eur J Dent Educ. 2019 May;23(2):95-100. doi: 10.1111/eje.12407. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
3
Measuring the Quality of University Lectures: Development and Validation of the Instructional Skills Questionnaire (ISQ).衡量大学讲座质量:教学技能问卷(ISQ)的开发与验证
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 26;11(2):e0149163. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149163. eCollection 2016.
4
Impact of Faculty Development Workshops in Student-Centered Teaching Methodologies on Faculty Members' Teaching and Their Students' Perceptions.以学生为中心的教学方法师资发展研讨会对教师教学及学生认知的影响
J Dent Educ. 2017 Jun;81(6):675-684. doi: 10.21815/JDE.017.014.
5
What Are University Professors' Motivations? A Realistic Approach to Self-Perception of a Group of Spanish University Professors Belonging to the G-9 Group of Universities.大学教授的动机是什么?对属于 G-9 大学集团的一组西班牙大学教授的自我认知的现实方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 28;18(15):7976. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18157976.
6
The importance of student research projects in dental education.学生科研项目在牙医学教育中的重要性。
Eur J Dent Educ. 2011 May;15(2):90-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2010.00645.x. Epub 2011 Mar 17.
7
The dental school learning milieu: students' perceptions at five academic dental institutions in Pakistan.巴基斯坦五所牙科学院的学习环境:学生的看法。
J Dent Educ. 2012 Apr;76(4):487-94.
8
Effectiveness of and Dental Student Satisfaction with Three Teaching Methods for Behavior Guidance Techniques in Pediatric Dentistry.三种行为引导技术教学方法在儿童牙科教学中的效果和牙科学生满意度。
J Dent Educ. 2019 Aug;83(8):966-972. doi: 10.21815/JDE.019.091. Epub 2019 May 13.
9
Professors' Expectations About Online Education and Its Relationship With Characteristics of University Entrance and Students' Academic Performance During the COVID-19 Pandemic.教授们对在线教育的期望及其在新冠疫情期间与大学入学特征和学生学业成绩的关系
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 8;12:642391. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.642391. eCollection 2021.
10
Dental students' perceptions on the contribution and impact role of a clinical teacher.牙科学生对临床教师的贡献及影响作用的看法。
Eur J Dent Educ. 2018 Feb;22(1):e26-e34. doi: 10.1111/eje.12252. Epub 2016 Dec 20.

引用本文的文献

1
The emotional and motivational costs of poorly delivered academic feedback.学术反馈传达不当所带来的情感和动机方面的代价。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jun 30;16:1585447. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1585447. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of a digital game for teaching behavioral aspects of clinical communication in dentistry.评价一款用于教授牙科临床沟通行为方面的数字游戏。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Feb 1;23(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04040-7.
2
Advancing through communication.通过沟通取得进展。
J Dent Educ. 2020 Jun 18. doi: 10.1002/jdd.12260.
3
Communication in Health Professions: A European consensus on inter- and multi-professional learning objectives in German.卫生专业中的沟通:德语版关于跨专业和多专业学习目标的欧洲共识。
GMS J Med Educ. 2016 Apr 29;33(2):Doc23. doi: 10.3205/zma001022. eCollection 2016.
4
A Latin American, Portuguese and Spanish consensus on a core communication curriculum for undergraduate medical education.拉丁美洲、葡萄牙和西班牙关于本科医学教育核心沟通课程的共识。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Mar 28;16:99. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0610-8.
5
Desire and reality--teaching and assessing communicative competencies in undergraduate medical education in German-speaking Europe--a survey.愿望与现实——德语区欧洲本科医学教育中沟通能力的教学与评估——一项调查
GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2015 Nov 16;32(5):Doc56. doi: 10.3205/zma000998. eCollection 2015.
6
Implementation of a flipped classroom educational model in a predoctoral dental course.在博士前牙科课程中实施翻转课堂教学模式。
J Dent Educ. 2015 May;79(5):563-70.
7
Exploring the relation between online case-based discussions and learning outcomes in dental education.探索牙科教育中基于案例的在线讨论与学习成果之间的关系。
J Dent Educ. 2014 Nov;78(11):1552-7.
8
The new licencing examination for human medicine: from concept to implementation.新的人类医学许可考试:从概念到实施。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2013 Dec 3;143:w13897. doi: 10.4414/smw.2013.13897. eCollection 2013.
9
A European consensus on learning objectives for a core communication curriculum in health care professions.欧洲医疗保健专业核心沟通课程学习目标共识
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Oct;93(1):18-26. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.10.016. Epub 2012 Nov 28.
10
The communication skills course for second year medical students at Hannover Medical School: An evaluation study based on students' self-assessments.汉诺威医学院针对二年级医学生开设的沟通技巧课程:一项基于学生自我评估的评估研究。
GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2011;28(4):Doc54. doi: 10.3205/zma000766. Epub 2011 Nov 15.