Kim Bokun, Osuka Yosuke, Okubo Yoshiro, Zhao Xiaoguang, Kim Gwon-Min, Oh Sechang
Future Convergence Research Institute, Changwon National University, Changwon, Republic of Korea; Human Community Renovation Research Center, R Professional University of Rehabilitation, Tsuchiura, Ibaraki, Japan.
Department of Frailty Research, Center for Gerontology and Social Science, Research Institute, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Aichi, Japan.
Am J Prev Med. 2025 Feb;68(2):348-356. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2024.10.015. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
Physical activity is widely accepted as a therapeutic approach to age-related muscle mass loss. However, it is unclear whether all physical activity domains benefit muscle mass maintenance. This study investigated the association between low muscle mass and domain-specific physical activity, including leisure-time and occupational moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA).
This study included 27,357 middle-aged and older individuals (≥40 years) whose data were collected from 2014 to 2022 and analyzed in 2024. Low muscle mass was defined as a muscle mass index 2 SDs below the sex-specific average of 9,426 young individuals (aged 20-39 years). Leisure-time and occupational MVPA were assessed using the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire and categorized as 0 min/wk, 1-149 min/wk, and ≥150 min/wk. Logistic regression analysis focused on all participants, and additional analyses stratified by sex, age, sedentary time, and transfer time were performed.
For leisure-time MVPA, participants with 1-149 min/wk and ≥150 min/wk had significantly lower odds of low muscle mass compared to those with no MVPA, with ORs of 0.795 (95% CI=0.691, 0.914) and 0.740 (95% CI=0.649, 0.843), respectively (p<0.01 for both). No significant association was found between occupational MVPA and low muscle mass. These findings were consistent across different strata of sex, age, sedentary time, and transfer time.
Leisure-time MVPA is inversely associated with low muscle mass, whereas occupational MVPA shows no association, highlighting the importance of dynamic movements of sufficient intensity and recuperation time in maintaining muscle mass.
体育活动被广泛认为是一种应对与年龄相关的肌肉量流失的治疗方法。然而,目前尚不清楚是否所有体育活动领域都对维持肌肉量有益。本研究调查了低肌肉量与特定领域体育活动之间的关联,包括休闲时间和职业中度至剧烈体育活动(MVPA)。
本研究纳入了27357名中年及老年个体(≥40岁),其数据于2014年至2022年收集,并于2024年进行分析。低肌肉量定义为肌肉量指数比9426名年轻个体(20 - 39岁)的性别特异性平均值低2个标准差。休闲时间和职业MVPA使用全球体育活动问卷进行评估,并分为0分钟/周、1 - 149分钟/周和≥150分钟/周。逻辑回归分析针对所有参与者进行,并按性别、年龄、久坐时间和通勤时间进行了额外分层分析。
对于休闲时间MVPA,每周进行1 - 149分钟和≥150分钟的参与者与不进行MVPA的参与者相比,低肌肉量的几率显著降低,OR分别为0.795(95%CI = 0.691, 0.914)和0.740(95%CI = 0.649, 0.843)(两者p均<0.01)。未发现职业MVPA与低肌肉量之间存在显著关联。这些发现在不同性别、年龄、久坐时间和通勤时间分层中是一致的。
休闲时间MVPA与低肌肉量呈负相关,而职业MVPA则无关联,这突出了足够强度的动态运动和恢复时间在维持肌肉量方面的重要性。