Prokhorov General Physics Institute, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Moscow Engineering Physics Institute, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Lasers Med Sci. 2024 Oct 31;39(1):266. doi: 10.1007/s10103-024-04219-4.
Different types of photosensitizers (PSs) have different dynamics and intensities of accumulation, depending on the type of tumor or different areas within the same tumor. This determines the effectiveness of fluorescence diagnostics and photodynamic therapy (PDT). This paper studies the processes of 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA)-induced protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) and chlorin e6 (Ce6) accumulation in the central and border zones of a tumor after combined administration of two PSs into the patient's body. Fluorescence diagnostic methods have shown that sublingual administration of 5-ALA leads to the more intense accumulation of PpIX in a tumor compared to oral administration. Differences have been identified in the dynamics of 5-ALA-induced PpIX and Ce6 accumulation in the central and border zones of the tumor, as well as normal tissues. Ce6 accumulates mainly in the central zone of the tumor while PpIX accumulates in the border zone of the tumor. All patients with combined PDT experienced complete therapeutic pathomorphosis and relapse-free observation.
不同类型的光敏剂(PS)在肿瘤或同一肿瘤的不同区域的积累具有不同的动力学和强度。这决定了荧光诊断和光动力疗法(PDT)的有效性。本文研究了两种 PS 联合给药后,肿瘤中心区和边缘区 5-氨基酮戊酸(5-ALA)诱导原卟啉 IX(PpIX)和氯乙酮 6(Ce6)积累的过程。荧光诊断方法表明,与口服给药相比,舌下给予 5-ALA 可使肿瘤中 PpIX 的积累更强烈。在肿瘤的中心区和边缘区以及正常组织中,已确定 5-ALA 诱导的 PpIX 和 Ce6 积累的动力学存在差异。Ce6 主要在肿瘤的中心区积累,而 PpIX 在肿瘤的边缘区积累。所有接受联合 PDT 治疗的患者均经历了完全的治疗病理形态改变和无复发观察。