• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿科研究中健康公平性学术研究编码的一个框架。

A schema for coding health equity scholarship within pediatric research.

作者信息

Abdi Najma, Tso Sabrina W, Roduin Cheyenne, Nylander Elisabeth, Jones Amanda L, Groshong Susan L, Paulsen Julia, Saelens Brian E

机构信息

Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.

University of Washington Department of Pediatrics, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Oct 2;8(1):e141. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.594. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1017/cts.2024.594
PMID:39478776
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11523018/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Seattle Children's Research Institute is identifying the amount and type of health equity scholarship being conducted institution wide. However, methods for categorizing how scholarship is equity-focused are lacking. We developed and evaluated the reliability of a health equity scholarship coding schema applied to Seattle Children's affiliated scholarship.

METHODS

A 2021-2022 Ovid MEDLINE affiliation search yielded 3551 affiliated scholarship records, with 1079 records identified via an existing filter as scholarship addressing social determinants of health. Through reliability testing and examining concordance and discordance across three independent coders of these records, we developed a coding schema to classify health equity scholarship (yes/no). When health equity scholarship proved positive/Yes, the coders assigned a one through five maturity rating of the scholarship towards addressing inequities. Subsequent reliability testing including a new coder was conducted for 992 subsequent affiliated scholarship records (Oct 2022-June 2023), with additional testing of the sensitivity and specificity of the existing filter relative to the new coding schema.

RESULTS

Reliability for identifying health equity scholarship was consistently high (Fleiss kappas ≥ .78) and categorization of health equity scholarship into maturity levels was moderate (Fleiss kappas ≥ .47). The coding schema identified additional health equity scholarship not captured in an existing filter for social determinants of health scholarship. Based on the new schema, 23.3% of Seattle Childrens' affiliated scholarship published October 2002-June 2023 was health equity focused.

CONCLUSIONS

This new coding schema can be used to identify and categorize health equity scholarship to help quantitate the health equity focus of portfolios of human-focused research.

摘要

引言

西雅图儿童研究所正在确定全机构范围内开展的健康公平奖学金的数量和类型。然而,缺乏对以公平为重点的奖学金进行分类的方法。我们开发并评估了一种应用于西雅图儿童附属奖学金的健康公平奖学金编码方案的可靠性。

方法

2021 - 2022年对Ovid MEDLINE附属机构的搜索产生了3551条附属奖学金记录,通过现有筛选器确定其中1079条记录为涉及健康社会决定因素的奖学金。通过可靠性测试以及检查这三位独立编码员对这些记录的一致性和不一致性,我们开发了一种编码方案来对健康公平奖学金进行分类(是/否)。当健康公平奖学金被证明为肯定/是时,编码员对该奖学金解决不平等问题的成熟度给予一到五级评分。随后对992条后续附属奖学金记录(2022年10月 - 2023年6月)进行了包括新编码员在内的可靠性测试,并对现有筛选器相对于新编码方案的敏感性和特异性进行了额外测试。

结果

识别健康公平奖学金的可靠性一直很高(Fleiss卡帕系数≥0.78),将健康公平奖学金分类为成熟度水平的可靠性为中等(Fleiss卡帕系数≥0.47)。该编码方案识别出了现有健康社会决定因素奖学金筛选器未涵盖的其他健康公平奖学金。根据新方案,2002年10月至2023年6月发表的西雅图儿童附属奖学金中有23.3%是以健康公平为重点的。

结论

这种新的编码方案可用于识别和分类健康公平奖学金,以帮助量化以人为中心的研究项目组合中的健康公平重点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d164/11523018/7f807ef27a75/S2059866124005946_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d164/11523018/d931904bb3b9/S2059866124005946_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d164/11523018/7f807ef27a75/S2059866124005946_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d164/11523018/d931904bb3b9/S2059866124005946_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d164/11523018/7f807ef27a75/S2059866124005946_fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
A schema for coding health equity scholarship within pediatric research.儿科研究中健康公平性学术研究编码的一个框架。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Oct 2;8(1):e141. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.594. eCollection 2024.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
We are part of the problem: the role of children's hospitals in addressing health inequity.我们也是问题的一部分:儿童医院在解决健康不平等问题中的作用。
Hosp Pract (1995). 2021 Oct;49(sup1):445-455. doi: 10.1080/21548331.2022.2032072. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
4
Development and validation of a search filter to identify equity-focused studies: reducing the number needed to screen.开发和验证一种用于识别以公平为重点的研究的搜索筛选器:减少需要筛选的数量。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Oct 12;18(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0567-x.
5
Education Scholarship Assessment Reconsidered: Expansion of Glassick's Criteria to Incorporate Health Equity.教育奖学金评估的再思考:扩展格拉斯克的标准以纳入健康公平。
Acad Med. 2024 May 1;99(5):487-492. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005654. Epub 2024 Feb 2.
6
Equity First: Conceptualizing a Normative Framework to Assess the Role of Preemption in Public Health.公平优先:概念化一个规范性框架,以评估预先防范在公共卫生中的作用。
Milbank Q. 2020 Mar;98(1):131-149. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12444. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
7
Learning Through Diversity: Creating a Virtuous Cycle of Health Equity in Health Care Organizations.多元共融学习:在医疗保健组织中打造健康公平的良性循环。
Adv Health Care Manag. 2022 Dec 12;21. doi: 10.1108/S1474-823120220000021009.
8
Impact of Public Smoking Bans on Social Inequalities in Children's Exposure to Tobacco Smoke at Home: An Equity-Focused Systematic Review.公共场所禁烟令对儿童在家中接触烟草烟雾的社会不平等影响:一项关注公平的系统性综述。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2019 Oct 26;21(11):1462-1472. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nty139.
9
A scoping review of equity-focused implementation theories, models and frameworks in healthcare and their application in addressing ethnicity-related health inequities.卫生保健中以公平为重点的实施理论、模型和框架的范围综述及其在解决与族裔有关的健康不平等问题中的应用。
Implement Sci. 2023 Oct 16;18(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s13012-023-01304-0.
10
What tools are available to assess climate and environmental health impacts on perinatal families with an equity lens? A rapid review of the Canadian context.有哪些工具可用于从公平视角评估气候和环境健康对围产期家庭的影响?对加拿大情况的快速审查。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Oct 18;24(1):680. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06761-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Mapping the distribution of health equity research and practice across a university: a network analysis.绘制一所大学内健康公平研究与实践的分布情况:一项网络分析。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 May 22;7(1):e142. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.555. eCollection 2023.
2
Committed to equity: New collection aims to understand disparities in sleep research.致力于公平:新的文集旨在了解睡眠研究中的差异。
J Clin Sleep Med. 2022 Jun 1;18(6):1483-1484. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.10036.
3
Engaging citizens living in vulnerable circumstances in research: a narrative review using a systematic search.
让生活在弱势环境中的公民参与研究:一项采用系统检索的叙述性综述
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Sep 3;7(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00306-w.
4
Directing Research Toward Health Equity: a Health Equity Research Impact Assessment.引导研究促进健康公平:健康公平研究影响评估。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Sep;36(9):2803-2808. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06789-3. Epub 2021 May 4.
5
Ethics of research at the intersection of COVID-19 and black lives matter: a call to action.新冠疫情与“黑人的命也是命”运动交叉领域的研究伦理:行动呼吁
J Med Ethics. 2021 Feb 5. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-107054.
6
Development and validation of a search filter to identify equity-focused studies: reducing the number needed to screen.开发和验证一种用于识别以公平为重点的研究的搜索筛选器:减少需要筛选的数量。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Oct 12;18(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0567-x.
7
STRUCTURAL RACISM AND HEALTH INEQUITIES: Old Issues, New Directions.结构性种族主义与健康不平等:老问题,新方向。
Du Bois Rev. 2011 Apr;8(1):115-132. doi: 10.1017/S1742058X11000130.
8
What are health disparities and health equity? We need to be clear.健康差异和健康公平是什么?我们需要明确这一点。
Public Health Rep. 2014 Jan-Feb;129 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):5-8. doi: 10.1177/00333549141291S203.
9
A systematic review of barriers and facilitators to minority research participation among African Americans, Latinos, Asian Americans, and Pacific Islanders.一项关于非裔美国人、拉丁裔、亚裔美国人和太平洋岛民参与少数族裔研究的障碍和促进因素的系统评价。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Feb;104(2):e16-31. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301706. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
10
Health disparities and health equity: the issue is justice.健康差异和健康公平:问题在于公正。
Am J Public Health. 2011 Dec;101 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S149-55. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2010.300062. Epub 2011 May 6.