• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evaluating Short-Term Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Following Total Hip and Knee Replacement: A Comprehensive Review.全髋关节和膝关节置换术后短期患者报告结局指标的评估:一项综述
Cureus. 2024 Sep 29;16(9):e70468. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70468. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Physiotherapy rehabilitation after total knee or hip replacement: an evidence-based analysis.全膝关节或髋关节置换术后的物理治疗康复:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2005;5(8):1-91. Epub 2005 Jun 1.
3
Comparison of 5-Year Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROMs) of Total Ankle Replacement (TAR) to Total Knee Replacement (TKR) and Total Hip Replacement (THR).全踝关节置换术(TAR)与全膝关节置换术(TKR)和全髋关节置换术(THR)的 5 年患者报告结局(PROMs)比较。
Foot Ankle Int. 2020 Jul;41(7):767-774. doi: 10.1177/1071100720918880. Epub 2020 May 5.
4
The Arthroplasty Candidacy Help Engine tool to select candidates for hip and knee replacement surgery: development and economic modelling.人工关节置换候选帮助引擎工具选择髋关节和膝关节置换手术的候选者:开发和经济建模。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Jun;23(32):1-216. doi: 10.3310/hta23320.
5
Comparison of clinical outcomes between total hip replacement and total knee replacement.全髋关节置换术与全膝关节置换术临床结果的比较。
World J Orthop. 2023 Dec 18;14(12):853-867. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v14.i12.853.
6
How do Patient-reported Outcome Scores in International Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Registries Compare?国际髋关节和膝关节置换登记处的患者报告结局评分如何比较?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Oct 1;480(10):1884-1896. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002306. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
7
Associations between preoperative Oxford hip and knee scores and costs and quality of life of patients undergoing primary total joint replacement in the NHS England: an observational study.英国国民医疗服务体系(NHS)中初次全关节置换患者术前牛津髋关节与膝关节评分与费用及生活质量的关联:一项观察性研究
BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 10;8(4):e019477. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019477.
8
Total Joint Replacement of Ankle, Knee, and Hip: How Do Patients Perceive Their Operative Outcomes at 10 Years?踝关节、膝关节和髋关节全关节置换术:患者如何看待他们10年的手术效果?
Foot Ankle Orthop. 2021 Jul 6;6(3):24730114211022735. doi: 10.1177/24730114211022735. eCollection 2021 Jul.
9
Patient acceptable symptom states after totalhip or knee replacement at mid-term follow-up: Thresholds of the Oxford hip and knee scores.中期随访全髋关节或膝关节置换术后患者可接受的症状状态:牛津髋关节和膝关节评分的阈值。
Bone Joint Res. 2014 Jan 13;3(1):7-13. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.31.2000141. Print 2014.
10
Are Oxford Hip Score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Useful Predictors of Clinical Meaningful Improvement and Satisfaction After Total Hip Arthroplasty?牛津髋关节评分和西部安大略省和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数是否可作为全髋关节置换术后临床有意义改善和满意度的有用预测指标?
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Sep;35(9):2458-2464. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.04.034. Epub 2020 Apr 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Temporal Patterns and Treatment Associations in Complications Following Hip Arthroplasty.髋关节置换术后并发症的时间模式及治疗关联
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Mar 23;15(7):815. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15070815.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient-Generated Health Data (PGHD): Understanding, Requirements, Challenges, and Existing Techniques for Data Security and Privacy.患者生成的健康数据(PGHD):数据安全与隐私方面的理解、要求、挑战及现有技术
J Pers Med. 2024 Mar 3;14(3):282. doi: 10.3390/jpm14030282.
2
Hip-specific and generic patient-reported outcome measure scores after primary hip replacement are associated with early revision surgery: a national registry study.初次髋关节置换术后髋关节特异性和通用型患者报告结局测量评分与早期翻修手术相关:一项全国登记研究。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Mar 21;8(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00713-z.
3
Postoperative pain trajectories in total hip arthroplasty.全髋关节置换术后的疼痛轨迹
Bone Jt Open. 2024 Mar 6;5(3):174-183. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.53.BJO-2023-0181.R1.
4
Comparison of clinical outcomes between total hip replacement and total knee replacement.全髋关节置换术与全膝关节置换术临床结果的比较。
World J Orthop. 2023 Dec 18;14(12):853-867. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v14.i12.853.
5
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: Exploring the Advances and Strategies.术后加速康复:探索进展与策略
Cureus. 2023 Oct 17;15(10):e47237. doi: 10.7759/cureus.47237. eCollection 2023 Oct.
6
Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Monitoring to Improve Quality of Life After Joint Replacement: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.电子患者报告结局监测对改善关节置换术后生活质量的作用:一项随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Sep 5;6(9):e2331301. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.31301.
7
Not all questions are created equal: the weight of the Oxford Knee Scores questions in a multicentric validation study.并非所有问题都具有同等重要性:在一项多中心验证研究中,牛津膝关节评分问题的权重。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2023 Aug 17;24(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s10195-023-00722-6.
8
Overcoming Challenges and Innovations in Orthopedic Prosthesis Design: An Interdisciplinary Perspective.骨科假体设计中的挑战与创新:跨学科视角
Biomed Mater Devices. 2023 May 12:1-12. doi: 10.1007/s44174-023-00087-8.
9
Defining a successful total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of metrics of clinically important changes.定义成功的全膝关节置换术:对具有临床重要意义的变化指标的系统评价
Arthroplasty. 2023 May 18;5(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s42836-023-00178-3.
10
Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Rehabilitation Protocol in the Perioperative Period of Orthopedics: A Systematic Review.骨科围手术期手术康复增强方案:一项系统评价
J Pers Med. 2023 Feb 26;13(3):421. doi: 10.3390/jpm13030421.

全髋关节和膝关节置换术后短期患者报告结局指标的评估:一项综述

Evaluating Short-Term Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Following Total Hip and Knee Replacement: A Comprehensive Review.

作者信息

Patel Vatsal, Deshpande Sanjay V, Jadawala Vivek H, Bhalsod Disheeta, Sawant Sharad

机构信息

Orthopedics, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education & Research, Wardha, IND.

Anesthesiology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education & Research, Wardha, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Sep 29;16(9):e70468. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70468. eCollection 2024 Sep.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.70468
PMID:39479148
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11522172/
Abstract

Total hip replacement (THR) and total knee replacement (TKR) are widely performed surgical procedures to alleviate pain and improve function in patients with joint-related diseases. Short-term patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have become a key metric in assessing the success of these surgeries from the patient's perspective, focusing on early recovery, pain management, mobility, and quality of life. This comprehensive review evaluates the significance of short-term PROMs following THR and TKR, highlighting commonly used tools such as the Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and short-form health survey (SF-36). The analysis explores the impact of various factors, such as age, preoperative health status, and surgical technique, on short-term outcomes. Findings from recent studies indicate that while patients generally report improvements in physical function and pain relief within the first six months post-surgery, individual outcomes can vary significantly. Factors like early rehabilitation, mental health, and the presence of postoperative complications can influence the trajectory of recovery and satisfaction levels. Moreover, the review addresses the limitations of current PROMs, including variability in reporting and sensitivity to different patient populations. This review emphasizes the need for more personalized and standardized approaches to PROM assessment to better capture patient experiences and optimize postoperative care. Future research should focus on integrating PROMs with long-term follow-up data and digital health tools to track real-time patient progress, thus enhancing the overall quality of care for THR and TKR patients. Short-term PROMs play a vital role in understanding patient outcomes and guiding clinical practice for joint replacement surgeries.

摘要

全髋关节置换术(THR)和全膝关节置换术(TKR)是广泛开展的外科手术,用于缓解关节相关疾病患者的疼痛并改善其功能。短期患者报告结局指标(PROMs)已成为从患者角度评估这些手术成功与否的关键指标,重点关注早期恢复、疼痛管理、活动能力和生活质量。本综述全面评估了THR和TKR术后短期PROMs的重要性,强调了常用工具,如牛津髋关节评分(OHS)、牛津膝关节评分(OKS)、西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)以及简短健康调查问卷(SF - 36)。该分析探讨了年龄、术前健康状况和手术技术等各种因素对短期结局的影响。近期研究结果表明,虽然患者通常在术后头六个月内报告身体功能有所改善且疼痛减轻,但个体结局可能差异显著。早期康复、心理健康和术后并发症的存在等因素会影响恢复轨迹和满意度水平。此外,本综述还讨论了当前PROMs的局限性,包括报告的变异性以及对不同患者群体的敏感性。本综述强调需要采用更个性化和标准化的PROM评估方法,以更好地了解患者体验并优化术后护理。未来的研究应专注于将PROMs与长期随访数据和数字健康工具相结合,以跟踪患者的实时进展,从而提高THR和TKR患者的整体护理质量。短期PROMs在了解患者结局和指导关节置换手术的临床实践中起着至关重要的作用。