Comparative study in treatment of acne scars fractional carbon dioxide laser versus micro needling fractional radio frequency - A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES

Efficacy of fractional carbon dioxide laser and microfractional radiofrequency in treatment of acne scars is well substantiated. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of carbon dioxide laser versus microfractional radiofrequency in treatment of acne scars in skin type 3,4.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirty-two patients of skin types 3-4 with grade 3 and 4 atrophic acne scars, of which 16 were treated with fractional carbon dioxide (CO) laser and 16 were treated with microfractional radiofrequency were retrospectively analyzed. All patients received either treatment 4 sessions at an interval of 4-6 weeks. Objective assessment was done with qualitative and quantitative Goodman and baron acne scar grading system by assessment of photographs at baseline and 3 months after last session.

RESULTS

All the data collected were entered in a Microsoft Excel worksheet and analyzed using R Software R-4.2.1. The study variables acne scar grades were described using frequency with percentage, acne scar scores were described using Mean with Standard deviation, and Median with interquartile range (IQR) (Q1-Q3). Since the data were ordinal, which is non-normal, hence, non-parametric tests are applied. To compare grades between the groups, Mann-Whitney U-test was applied.

CONCLUSION

There was no difference in the last session (after the treatment) between the groups, the Mann- Whitney U-test was 109.5 with -value of 0.484 >0.05. Therefore, there was no statistically significant difference between the microfractional radiofrequency and carbon dioxide laser group. There were 2 (12.5%) cases reported with post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation in the CO laser group and zero cases in the microfractional radiofrequency group.