Alexis Andrew F, Coley Marcelyn K, Nijhawan Rajiv I, Luke Janiene D, Shah Sejal K, Argobi Yahya A, Nodzenski Michael, Veledar Emir, Alam Murad
*Skin of Color Center, Department of Dermatology, Mount Sinai St. Luke's, New York, New York; †Summit Medical Group, Berkeley Heights, New Jersey; ‡Department of Dermatology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; §Department of Dermatology, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California; ‖Department of Dermatology, Tufts School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; ¶Department of Dermatology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois; #Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Dermatol Surg. 2016 Mar;42(3):392-402. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000640.
There is a paucity of studies investigating laser resurfacing in Fitzpatrick skin phototypes (SPT) IV to VI.
To assess the efficacy and safety of fractional nonablative laser resurfacing in the treatment of acne scarring in patients with SPT IV to VI.
The authors conducted a randomized, investigator-blinded and rater-blinded, split-face comparative study of adults with SPT IV to VI and facial acne scars treated with 2 different density settings and the same fluence.
Quantitative global scarring grading system (QGSGS) scores were significantly improved from baseline at 16 and 24 weeks (p = .0277). Improvements in QGSGS scores after higher and lower density treatments were statistically similar (p = .96). The live-blinded dermatologist, the blinded dermatologist photoraters, and the patients rated scars as being significantly more improved by visual analog scale at weeks 16 and 24 compared with baseline (p < .001) for both treatment densities. Five of 7 and 3 of 7 patients in the higher and lower density group, respectively, experienced mild or moderate hyperpigmentation as an investigator observed site reaction.
The nonablative 1550-nm fractional laser is safe and efficacious in treating acne scaring in Fitzpatrick skin types IV to VI. Self-limited postinflammatory hyperpigmentation was a common occurrence, especially with higher treatment densities.
针对 Fitzpatrick 皮肤光类型(SPT)IV 至 VI 型进行激光换肤的研究较少。
评估非剥脱性分次激光换肤治疗 SPT IV 至 VI 型患者痤疮瘢痕的疗效和安全性。
作者对患有 SPT IV 至 VI 型且有面部痤疮瘢痕的成年人进行了一项随机、研究者盲法和评估者盲法的半脸对照研究,采用两种不同密度设置和相同能量密度进行治疗。
定量整体瘢痕分级系统(QGSGS)评分在 16 周和 24 周时较基线有显著改善(p = 0.0277)。高密度和低密度治疗后 QGSGS 评分的改善在统计学上相似(p = 0.96)。在 16 周和 24 周时,与基线相比,无论治疗密度如何,活体盲法皮肤科医生、盲法皮肤科摄影评估者和患者通过视觉模拟量表评定瘢痕均有显著改善(p < 0.001)。在高密度组的 7 名患者中有 5 名,低密度组的 7 名患者中有 3 名出现了轻度或中度色素沉着,这是研究者观察到的局部反应。
非剥脱性 1550 纳米分次激光治疗 Fitzpatrick IV 至 VI 型皮肤的痤疮瘢痕安全有效。炎症后色素沉着自限是常见现象,尤其是在较高治疗密度时。