Integrating Rapid Evidence Generation and Synthesis in the Researcher's Methods Toolkit.
作者信息
Antonio Carl Abelardo T
机构信息
Department of Health Policy and Administration, College of Public Health, University of the Philippines Manila.
出版信息
Acta Med Philipp. 2023 Nov 24;57(11):3-4. doi: 10.47895/amp.v57i11.9097. eCollection 2023.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Integrating Rapid Evidence Generation and Synthesis in the Researcher's Methods Toolkit.将快速证据生成与综合纳入研究人员的方法工具包。
Acta Med Philipp. 2023 Nov 24;57(11):3-4. doi: 10.47895/amp.v57i11.9097. eCollection 2023.
2
Tools for Synthesis Planning, Automation, and Analytical Data Analysis.合成规划、自动化及分析数据分析工具。
Chimia (Aarau). 2023 Feb 22;77(1-2):17-21. doi: 10.2533/chimia.2023.17.
3
Expanding the brain researcher's toolkit.拓展大脑研究者的工具包。
Science. 2020 Aug 7;369(6504):637. doi: 10.1126/science.abd2660.
4
Researcher's Workbench.研究者工作台
Comput Nurs. 1991 May-Jun;9(3):116-20.
5
Hermeneutic reading of classic texts.经典文本的诠释性阅读。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2013 Sep;27(3):757-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2012.01080.x. Epub 2012 Sep 24.
6
Advances in live imaging early mouse development: exploring the researcher's interdisciplinary toolkit.活体成像技术在早期小鼠胚胎发育中的进展：探索研究人员的跨学科工具包。
Development. 2021 Sep 15;148(18). doi: 10.1242/dev.199433. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
7
Demystifying Qualitative Research for Musculoskeletal Practitioners Part 4: A Qualitative Researcher's Toolkit-Sampling, Data Collection Methods, and Data Analysis.为肌肉骨骼从业者揭开定性研究的神秘面纱 第四部分：定性研究人员的工具包——抽样、数据收集方法和数据分析。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2022 Jan;52(1):8-10. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2022.10486.
8
"Doing death": Reflecting on the researcher's subjectivity and emotions.“面对死亡”：反思研究者的主观性与情感
Death Stud. 2017 Jan;41(1):6-13. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2016.1257877. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
9
Does Exonerating an Accused Researcher Restore the Researcher's Credibility?宣告被指控的研究人员无罪能恢复其信誉吗？
PLoS One. 2015 May 13;10(5):e0126316. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126316. eCollection 2015.
10
Touching the dead: Autoethnographical reflections about the researcher's body in the field of death, dying, and bereavement.触碰死者：关于死亡、濒死和丧亲领域中研究人员身体的自传体反思。
Death Stud. 2018 Nov-Dec;42(10):640-648. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2018.1426656. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
本文引用的文献
1
Editorial: Rapid research in action: lessons from the field.社论：行动中的快速研究：来自实地的经验教训。
Front Sociol. 2023 Jun 20;8:1216834. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2023.1216834. eCollection 2023.
2
Conducting rapid qualitative interview research during the COVID-19 pandemic-Reflections on methodological choices.在新冠疫情期间开展快速定性访谈研究——关于方法选择的思考
Front Sociol. 2022 Aug 11;7:953872. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2022.953872. eCollection 2022.
3
How do researchers approach societal impact?研究人员如何看待社会影响？
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 9;16(7):e0254006. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254006. eCollection 2021.
4
Rapid versus traditional qualitative analysis using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).使用实施研究整合框架（CFIR）进行快速与传统定性分析。
Implement Sci. 2021 Jul 2;16(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01111-5.
5
Rapid ethnographic assessment of the COVID-19 pandemic April 2020 'surge' and its impact on service delivery in an Acute Care Medical Emergency Department and Trauma Center.2020 年 4 月 COVID-19 大流行“激增”及其对急症医疗急救部和创伤中心服务提供的影响的快速民族志评估。
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 20;10(10):e041772. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041772.
6
Rapid Techniques in Qualitative Research: A Critical Review of the Literature.快速定性研究技术：文献综述的批判性评价。
Qual Health Res. 2020 Aug;30(10):1596-1604. doi: 10.1177/1049732320921835.
7
Examining the Social Benefits Principle in Research with Human Participants.审视涉及人类受试者研究中的社会利益原则。
Health Care Anal. 2018 Mar;26(1):66-80. doi: 10.1007/s10728-016-0326-2.
8
A scoping review of rapid review methods.快速综述方法的范围综述
BMC Med. 2015 Sep 16;13:224. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0465-6.
9
How long does biomedical research take? Studying the time taken between biomedical and health research and its translation into products, policy, and practice.生物医学研究需要多长时间？研究生物医学与健康研究之间的时间跨度，以及其转化为产品、政策和实践所需的时间。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2015 Jan 1;13:1. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-13-1.
10
Closing the chasm between research and practice: evidence of and for change.弥合研究与实践之间的差距：变革的证据和证明。
Health Promot J Austr. 2014 Apr;25(1):25-9. doi: 10.1071/HE13101.
Zotero 插件