Zhou Shuai, Chi Guangqing
Department of Global Development, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA. Department of Agricultural Economics, Sociology, and Education, Population Research Institute, and Social Science Research Institute, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
Department of Agricultural Economics, Sociology, and Education, Population Research Institute, and Social Science Research Institute, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
Demogr Res. 2024 Jan-Jun;50:41-100. doi: 10.4054/demres.2024.50.2. Epub 2024 Jan 5.
The amount of literature on environmental migration is increasing. However, existing studies exhibit contradictory results. A systematic synthesis of the environment-migration relationship is much needed.
This study summarizes research findings, calculates the effect sizes of environmental stressors, identifies publication bias, and investigates heterogeneous environmental effects on migration.
We collected 3,380 estimates from 128 studies published between 2000 and 2020 to explore the environment-migration relationship and performed weighted instrumental variable regression to unveil the heterogeneous environmental effects on out- and net migration.
The majority of environmental stressors were not important predictors of out- and net migration. Among the results showing environmental impacts on migration, 58% and 68% reported that environmental stressors increased out- and net migration, respectively, while 58% reported that environmental stressors decreased in-migration. The overall environmental impact on migration was small; however, disaster-related stressors showed a medium effect, and rapid-onset stressors had a stronger impact than slow-onset ones. Multivariate meta-regression analyses demonstrated that environmental stressors were more likely to trigger internal migration than international migration and that developed countries were less likely to experience out-migration. Rapid-onset environmental stressors did not increase out-migration but played an important role in decreasing net migration toward environmentally stressed areas. Meanwhile, we also found a publication bias toward studies showing a positive relationship between environmental stressors and migration in the previous environmental migration literature.
Environmental stressors may affect migration; however, the environmental effect depends on migration measurements, environmental stressors' forces and rapidity, and the context in which migration takes place.
This study contributes to migration studies by synthesizing and validating the environment-migration relationship and enhancing our understanding of how and under what circumstances environmental stressors may affect migration.
关于环境移民的文献数量正在增加。然而,现有研究呈现出相互矛盾的结果。因此,非常需要对环境与移民关系进行系统的综合分析。
本研究总结研究结果,计算环境压力源的效应量,识别发表偏倚,并调查环境对移民的异质性影响。
我们收集了2000年至2020年间发表的128项研究中的3380个估计值,以探讨环境与移民的关系,并进行加权工具变量回归,以揭示环境对迁出和净移民的异质性影响。
大多数环境压力源并非迁出和净移民的重要预测因素。在显示环境对移民有影响的结果中,分别有58%和68%的研究报告称环境压力源增加了迁出和净移民,而58%的研究报告称环境压力源减少了迁入移民。环境对移民的总体影响较小;然而,与灾害相关的压力源显示出中等效应,突发压力源的影响比缓发压力源更强。多变量元回归分析表明,环境压力源比国际移民更有可能引发国内移民,发达国家出现迁出移民的可能性较小。突发环境压力源并未增加迁出移民,但在减少向环境压力地区的净移民方面发挥了重要作用。同时,我们还发现,在以往的环境移民文献中,存在对显示环境压力源与移民呈正相关关系的研究的发表偏倚。
环境压力源可能会影响移民;然而,环境影响取决于移民衡量标准、环境压力源的强度和速度以及移民发生的背景。
本研究通过综合和验证环境与移民的关系,并增强我们对环境压力源如何以及在何种情况下可能影响移民的理解,为移民研究做出了贡献。