• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF)患者30天和1年死亡率的预测

Predicting 30-Day and 1-Year Mortality in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF).

作者信息

Shin Ikgyu, Bhatt Nilay, Alashi Alaa, Kandala Keervani, Murugiah Karthik

机构信息

Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.

Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.

出版信息

medRxiv. 2024 Oct 16:2024.10.15.24315524. doi: 10.1101/2024.10.15.24315524.

DOI:10.1101/2024.10.15.24315524
PMID:39484276
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11527066/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To develop and compare prediction models for 30-day and 1-year mortality in Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) using EHR data, utilizing both traditional and machine learning (ML) techniques.

BACKGROUND

HFpEF represents 1 in 2 heart failure patients. Predictive models in HFpEF, specifically those derived from electronic health record (EHR) data, are less established.

METHODS

Using MIMIC-IV EHR data from 2008-2019, patients aged ≥ 18 years admitted with a primary diagnosis of HFpEF were identified using ICD-9 and 10 codes. Demographics, vital signs, prior diagnoses, and lab data were extracted. Data was partitioned into 80% training, 20% test sets. Prediction models from seven model classes (Support Vector Classifier (SVC), Logistic Regression, Lasso Regression, Elastic Net, Random Forest, Histogram-based Gradient Boosting Classifier (HGBC), and XGBoost) were developed using various imputation and oversampling techniques with 5-fold cross-validation. Model performance was compared using several metrics, and individual feature importance assessed using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis.

RESULTS

Among 3910 hospitalizations for HFpEF, 30-day mortality was 6.3%, and 1-year mortality was 29.2%. Logistic regression performed well for 30-day mortality (Area Under the Receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) 0.83), whereas Random Forest (AUC 0.79) and HGBC (AUC 0.78) for 1-year mortality. Age and NT-proBNP were the strongest predictors in SHAP analyses for both outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Models derived from EHR data can predict mortality after HFpEF hospitalization with comparable performance to models derived from registry or trial data, highlighting the potential for clinical implementation.

摘要

目的

利用电子健康记录(EHR)数据,运用传统和机器学习(ML)技术,开发并比较射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF)患者30天和1年死亡率的预测模型。

背景

HFpEF占心力衰竭患者的二分之一。HFpEF的预测模型,尤其是那些从电子健康记录(EHR)数据得出的模型,尚不完善。

方法

使用2008 - 2019年的MIMIC-IV EHR数据,通过ICD - 9和10编码识别年龄≥18岁且以HFpEF为主要诊断入院的患者。提取人口统计学、生命体征、既往诊断和实验室数据。数据被划分为80%的训练集和20%的测试集。使用各种插补和过采样技术以及5折交叉验证,开发了来自七个模型类别的预测模型(支持向量分类器(SVC)、逻辑回归、套索回归、弹性网络、随机森林、基于直方图的梯度提升分类器(HGBC)和XGBoost)。使用多种指标比较模型性能,并使用夏普利值附加解释(SHAP)分析评估个体特征重要性。

结果

在3910例HFpEF住院病例中,30天死亡率为6.3%,1年死亡率为29.2%。逻辑回归对30天死亡率表现良好(受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)为0.83),而随机森林(AUC为0.79)和HGBC(AUC为0.78)对1年死亡率表现较好。在两种结局的SHAP分析中,年龄和N末端脑钠肽前体(NT-proBNP)是最强的预测因素。

结论

从EHR数据得出的模型可以预测HFpEF住院后的死亡率,其性能与从注册登记或试验数据得出的模型相当,突出了临床应用的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4814/11527066/4fe3e2db4fe0/nihpp-2024.10.15.24315524v1-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4814/11527066/ccf04d93534f/nihpp-2024.10.15.24315524v1-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4814/11527066/13ae38d18510/nihpp-2024.10.15.24315524v1-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4814/11527066/4fe3e2db4fe0/nihpp-2024.10.15.24315524v1-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4814/11527066/ccf04d93534f/nihpp-2024.10.15.24315524v1-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4814/11527066/13ae38d18510/nihpp-2024.10.15.24315524v1-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4814/11527066/4fe3e2db4fe0/nihpp-2024.10.15.24315524v1-f0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Predicting 30-Day and 1-Year Mortality in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF).射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF)患者30天和1年死亡率的预测
medRxiv. 2024 Oct 16:2024.10.15.24315524. doi: 10.1101/2024.10.15.24315524.
2
Prediction of 90 day readmission in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction by interpretable machine learning.通过可解释机器学习预测射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者90天再入院情况。
ESC Heart Fail. 2024 Dec;11(6):4267-4276. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.15033. Epub 2024 Aug 21.
3
Noncontrast Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predictors of Heart Failure Hospitalization in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者中,非增强心脏磁共振成像对心力衰竭住院的预测因素
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2022 Jun;55(6):1812-1825. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27932. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
4
Machine Learning Prediction of Mortality and Hospitalization in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.机器学习预测射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者的死亡率和住院率。
JACC Heart Fail. 2020 Jan;8(1):12-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.06.013. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
5
Development of interpretable machine learning models to predict in-hospital prognosis of acute heart failure patients.开发可解释的机器学习模型以预测急性心力衰竭患者的院内预后。
ESC Heart Fail. 2024 Oct;11(5):2798-2812. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14834. Epub 2024 May 15.
6
Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Hospital Readmissions and Worsening Heart Failure Events in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: Modeling Study.射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者再入院及心力衰竭恶化事件预测的机器学习算法比较:建模研究
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Apr 17;7:e41775. doi: 10.2196/41775.
7
Establishment and validation of a heart failure risk prediction model for elderly patients after coronary rotational atherectomy based on machine learning.基于机器学习的老年患者冠状动脉旋磨术后心力衰竭风险预测模型的建立与验证
PeerJ. 2024 Jan 31;12:e16867. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16867. eCollection 2024.
8
Prediction of Acute Kidney Injury Following Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Heart Failure Patients with Preserved Ejection Fraction Using Machine Leaning with a Novel Nomogram.使用机器学习和新型列线图预测射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者单纯冠状动脉旁路移植术后的急性肾损伤
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Jan 29;25(2):43. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2502043. eCollection 2024 Feb.
9
Association of a Novel Diagnostic Biomarker, the Plasma Cardiac Bridging Integrator 1 Score, With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction and Cardiovascular Hospitalization.新型诊断生物标志物——血浆心脏桥连整合素 1 评分与射血分数保留心力衰竭及心血管住院的相关性。
JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Dec 1;3(12):1206-1210. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.3539.
10
Interpretable machine learning model for early prediction of 28-day mortality in ICU patients with sepsis-induced coagulopathy: development and validation.用于脓毒症诱导性凝血病 ICU 患者 28 天死亡率早期预测的可解释机器学习模型:开发与验证。
Eur J Med Res. 2024 Jan 3;29(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01593-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Race- and Ethnicity-Related Differences in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Using Natural Language Processing.使用自然语言处理技术分析射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者中与种族和民族相关的差异
JACC Adv. 2024 Jul 2;3(8):101064. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101064. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
TRIPOD+AI statement: updated guidance for reporting clinical prediction models that use regression or machine learning methods.TRIPOD+AI 声明:报告使用回归或机器学习方法的临床预测模型的更新指南。
BMJ. 2024 Apr 16;385:e078378. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-078378.
3
Prognostic Models for Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.
射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者死亡率和发病率的预后模型
JAMA Cardiol. 2024 May 1;9(5):457-465. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.0284.
4
Prognostic models for patients suffering a heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review.患有射血分数保留型心力衰竭的患者的预后模型:系统评价。
ESC Heart Fail. 2024 Jun;11(3):1341-1351. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14696. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
5
2023 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on Management of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Solution Set Oversight Committee.2023年美国心脏病学会射血分数保留的心力衰竭管理专家共识决策路径:美国心脏病学会解决方案集监督委员会报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023 May 9;81(18):1835-1878. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.03.393. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
6
MIMIC-IV, a freely accessible electronic health record dataset.MIMIC-IV,一个可自由访问的电子健康记录数据集。
Sci Data. 2023 Jan 3;10(1):1. doi: 10.1038/s41597-022-01899-x.
7
Biomarker-driven prognostic models in chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the EMPEROR-Preserved trial.生物标志物驱动的射血分数保留型慢性心力衰竭预后模型: EMPEROR-Preserved 试验。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2022 Oct;24(10):1869-1878. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2607. Epub 2022 Jul 24.
8
A Modified AUC for Training Convolutional Neural Networks: Taking Confidence Into Account.一种用于训练卷积神经网络的改进AUC:考虑置信度
Front Artif Intell. 2021 Nov 30;4:582928. doi: 10.3389/frai.2021.582928. eCollection 2021.
9
Risk prediction model of in-hospital mortality in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and mid-range ejection fraction: a retrospective cohort study.射血分数保留的心力衰竭和中间范围射血分数的住院死亡率风险预测模型:一项回顾性队列研究。
Biomark Med. 2021 Oct;15(14):1223-1232. doi: 10.2217/bmm-2021-0025. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
10
The advantages of the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) over F1 score and accuracy in binary classification evaluation.马修斯相关系数(MCC)在二分类评估中优于 F1 得分和准确率的优势。
BMC Genomics. 2020 Jan 2;21(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-6413-7.