Pohlig Florian, Becker Roland, Ettinger Max, Calliess Tilman, Hinterwimmer Florian, Tibesku Carsten O, Schnurr Christoph, Graichen Heiko, Savov Peter, Pagano Stefano, Bieger Ralf, Gollwitzer Hans
Klinik für Orthopädie und Sportorthopädie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, München, Deutschland.
Zentrum für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Endoprothesenzentrum West-Brandenburg, Universitätsklinikum Brandenburg an der Havel, Hochstr. 29, 14770, Brandenburg an der Havel, Deutschland.
Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2024 Dec;53(12):935-944. doi: 10.1007/s00132-024-04575-7. Epub 2024 Nov 1.
Digital tools are being increasingly used worldwide in primary knee arthroplasty. This study aimed to analyze the utilization density of digital tools, the preferred alignment strategies, and the obstacles and benefits of implementing these technologies in German-speaking countries.
An online survey with 57 questions about digital tools in primary knee arthroplasty and their usage was conducted among members of the Arthroplasty Working Group (AE). The survey included questions on navigation, robotics, patient-specific instruments, individualized implants, and augmented reality.
The survey revealed that 18% of hospitals use navigation and 17% use robotic systems in primary total knee arthroplasty surgery. The main reasons for not implementing supportive technologies were high acquisition and ongoing costs, as well as longer surgical duration. Patient-specific instruments and individualized implants currently play a minor role. Patient-specific alignment strategies, such as kinematic (navigation: 35%; robotics: 44%) and functional alignment (navigation: 15%; robotics: 35%), are preferred in this context. With conventional instrumentation predominantly mechanical alignment was applied (79%).
The results indicate a relatively high utilization density of digital tools, which are mainly used to perform personalized alignment strategies in primary knee arthroplasty in German-speaking countries. This was particularly evident in high-volume hospitals. Economic aspects were the main reasons for not using these technologies. Future developments should aim to simplify the systems and thus achieve improved cost efficiency.
数字工具在全球范围内越来越多地应用于初次膝关节置换术。本研究旨在分析德语国家数字工具的使用密度、首选的对线策略以及实施这些技术的障碍和益处。
对关节置换工作组(AE)的成员进行了一项在线调查,该调查包含57个关于初次膝关节置换术中数字工具及其使用情况的问题。调查内容包括导航、机器人技术、患者特异性器械、个性化植入物和增强现实等方面的问题。
调查显示,在初次全膝关节置换手术中,18%的医院使用导航,17%的医院使用机器人系统。不采用支持技术的主要原因是购置成本和持续成本高昂,以及手术时间延长。患者特异性器械和个性化植入物目前发挥的作用较小。在这种情况下,患者特异性对线策略,如运动学对线(导航:35%;机器人技术:44%)和功能对线(导航:15%;机器人技术:35%)更受青睐。使用传统器械时,主要采用机械对线(79%)。
结果表明数字工具的使用密度相对较高,在德语国家,这些工具主要用于初次膝关节置换术中执行个性化对线策略。这在大型医院中尤为明显。经济因素是不使用这些技术的主要原因。未来的发展应旨在简化系统,从而提高成本效益。