Suppr超能文献

不同的机器人辅助个性化全膝关节置换术概述,如何选择?

Overview of the different personalized total knee arthroplasty with robotic assistance, how choosing?

作者信息

Morcos Mina Wahba, Uhuebor David, Vendittoli Pascal-André

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Clinique Orthopédique Duval, Laval, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Front Surg. 2023 Mar 3;10:1120908. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1120908. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Current limitations in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) function and patient satisfaction stimulated us to question our practice. Our understanding of knee anatomy and biomechanics has evolved over recent years as we now consider that a more personalized joint reconstruction may be a better-targeted goal for TKA. Implant design and surgical techniques must be advanced to better reproduce the anatomy and kinematics of native knees and ultimately provide a forgotten joint. The availability of precision tools as robotic assistance surgery can help us recreate patient anatomy and ensure components are not implanted in a position that may compromise long-term outcomes. Robotic-assisted surgery is gaining in popularity and may be the future of orthopedic surgery. However, moving away from the concept of neutrally aligning every TKA dogma opens the door to new techniques emergence based on opinion and experience and leads to a certain amount of uncertainty among knee surgeons. Hence, it is important to clearly describe each technique and analyze their potential impacts and benefits. Personalized TKA techniques may be classified into 2 main families: unrestricted or restricted component orientation. In the restricted group, some will aim to reproduce native ligament laxity versus aiming for ligament isometry. When outside of their boundaries, all restricted techniques will induce anatomical changes. Similarly, most native knee having asymmetric ligaments laxity between compartments and within the same compartment during the arc of flexion; aiming for ligament isometry induces bony anatomy changes. In the current paper, we will summarize and discuss the impacts of the different robotic personalized alignment techniques, including kinematic alignment (KA), restricted kinematic alignment (rKA), inverse kinematic alignment (iKA), and functional alignment (FA). With every surgical technique, there are limitations and shortcomings. As our implants are still far from the native knee, it is primordial to understand the impacts and benefits of each technique. Mid to long data will help us in defining the new standards.

摘要

全膝关节置换术(TKA)目前在功能和患者满意度方面存在的局限性促使我们反思自身的做法。近年来,我们对膝关节解剖学和生物力学的理解不断发展,现在认为更个性化的关节重建可能是TKA更具针对性的目标。必须改进植入物设计和手术技术,以更好地重现天然膝关节的解剖结构和运动学,最终打造出一个被遗忘的关节。像机器人辅助手术这样的精密工具的出现,可以帮助我们重现患者的解剖结构,并确保植入部件的位置不会影响长期效果。机器人辅助手术越来越受欢迎,可能是骨科手术的未来发展方向。然而,摒弃将每个TKA都进行中立对线的理念,为基于观点和经验的新技术的出现打开了大门,也在膝关节外科医生中引发了一定程度的不确定性。因此,清楚地描述每种技术并分析其潜在影响和益处非常重要。个性化TKA技术可主要分为两大类:无限制或有限制的部件定向。在有限制的类别中,一些技术旨在重现天然韧带松弛度,而另一些则旨在实现韧带等长。当超出其界限时,所有有限制的技术都会引起解剖学变化。同样,大多数天然膝关节在屈伸过程中,不同间室之间以及同一间室内的韧带松弛度是不对称的;追求韧带等长会导致骨骼解剖结构的改变。在本文中,我们将总结并讨论不同的机器人个性化对线技术的影响,包括运动学对线(KA)、受限运动学对线(rKA)、逆运动学对线(iKA)和功能对线(FA)。每种手术技术都有其局限性和缺点。由于我们的植入物仍与天然膝关节相差甚远,了解每种技术的影响和益处至关重要。中长期数据将有助于我们确定新的标准。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1880/10020354/e68ec8954772/fsurg-10-1120908-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验