Dewitte Margo M J, Warreyn Petra, Prinzie Peter, De Pauw Sarah S W
Department of Special Needs Education, Ghent University, Henri Dunantlaan 2, Ghent, B-9000, Belgium.
Department of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
J Autism Dev Disord. 2024 Nov 2. doi: 10.1007/s10803-024-06625-7.
This study adopts a person-centered approach to evaluate personality diversity as a source of interpersonal variability in autistic children and adolescents, and how personality subgroup membership relates to variability in autistic characteristics, social-emotional presentations, and parenting outcomes. Latent Profile Analysis was used to analyze 569 parent reports on a child-based Five-Factor-Model personality measure (aged 6-18 years; M = 11.8 years, SD = 3.1; 70% boys). Four distinct personality profile groups were identified, showing varying levels in the low to average range of all five personality domains. All groups scored lowest on Extraversion and Emotional Stability. They differed the most in Imagination and the least in Emotional Stability. Group 1 (n = 72) exhibited the lowest mean-level scores on all five domains, whereas Group 4 (n = 90) had the highest domain scores. Group 2 (n = 307) and Group 3 (n = 100) showed more diverse patterns. Group membership was meaningfully associated with variation in characteristics of social interaction and communication, internalizing, externalizing, and attentional problems, psychosocial strengths, and positive parenting strategies. Only modest group differences were found in parenting stress. All groups had similar scores on repetitive and restrictive behaviors. These findings help to better understand and support natural subgroups within the autism phenotype by exploring shared personality attributes.
本研究采用以人为本的方法,评估人格多样性作为自闭症儿童和青少年人际差异的一个来源,以及人格亚组成员身份如何与自闭症特征、社会情感表现和养育结果的差异相关。潜在剖面分析用于分析569份基于儿童的五因素模型人格量表的家长报告(年龄6 - 18岁;M = 11.8岁,SD = 3.1;70%为男孩)。确定了四个不同的人格剖面组,在所有五个人格领域的低到平均范围内呈现出不同水平。所有组在外向性和情绪稳定性方面得分最低。它们在想象力方面差异最大,在情绪稳定性方面差异最小。第1组(n = 72)在所有五个领域的平均水平得分最低,而第4组(n = 90)的领域得分最高。第2组(n = 307)和第3组(n = 100)表现出更多样化的模式。组成员身份与社交互动和沟通特征、内化、外化和注意力问题、心理社会优势以及积极养育策略的差异有显著关联。在养育压力方面仅发现适度的组间差异。所有组在重复和限制性行为方面得分相似。这些发现有助于通过探索共享的人格属性来更好地理解和支持自闭症表型中的自然亚组。