• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成人哮喘流行病学评分的验证:基于人群的 EPI-ASTHMA 研究的二次分析。

Validation of the adult asthma epidemiological score: a secondary analysis of the EPI-ASTHMA population-based study.

机构信息

University of Porto Faculty of Medicine, Porto, Portugal.

CINTESIS@RISE, Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision25 Sciences (MEDCIDS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 2;14(11):e086493. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086493.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086493
PMID:39488415
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11867667/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The A2 score is an eight-question patient-reported outcome measure that has been validated for ruling in (score ≥4) and ruling out (score 0-1) asthma. However, this screening tool has been validated in a cohort similar to the derivation cohort used. This study aims to validate the predictive accuracy of the A2 score in a primary care population against general practitioner (GP) clinical assessment and to determine whether the proposed cut-offs are the most appropriate.

DESIGN

This accuracy study is a secondary analysis of the EPI-ASTHMA population-based study.

SETTING

Primary care centres in Portugal.

PARTICIPANTS

Random adult participants answered the A2 score by phone interview.

OUTCOMES

Those with an A2 score ≥1 (plus 5% with an A2 score of 0) were invited to a diagnostic visit carried out by a GP to confirm or not a diagnosis of asthma. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

RESULTS

A total of 1283 participants (median 54 (p25-p75 43-66) years; 60% women) were analysed. The A2 score showed high discriminatory power in identifying asthma, with an area under the ROC curve of 82.9% (95% CI 80.4% to 85.4%). The proposed cut-off ≥4 was the most appropriate to rule in asthma (specificity 83.1%, positive predictive value 62.4%, accuracy 78%). Similarly, the proposed cut-off<2 was the most suitable for excluding asthma (sensitivity 92.7%, negative predictive value 93.7%, accuracy 60.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

The A2 score is a useful tool to identify patients with asthma in a primary care population.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT0516961.

摘要

目的

A2 评分是一种包含八个问题的患者报告结局测量工具,已在临床上验证用于确诊(评分≥4)和排除(评分 0-1)哮喘。然而,该筛查工具仅在与推导队列相似的队列中得到验证。本研究旨在验证 A2 评分在初级保健人群中用于临床医生(GP)评估的预测准确性,并确定所提出的截断值是否最合适。

设计

这是一项基于 EPI-ASTHMA 人群的研究的准确性研究的二次分析。

地点

葡萄牙的基层医疗中心。

参与者

随机成年参与者通过电话采访回答 A2 评分。

结果

A2 评分≥1(加上 5%的 A2 评分为 0)的患者被邀请参加由 GP 进行的诊断访问,以确认或排除哮喘诊断。使用接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线评估诊断准确性。

结果

共分析了 1283 名参与者(中位数 54(p25-p75 43-66)岁;60%为女性)。A2 评分在识别哮喘方面具有很高的区分能力,ROC 曲线下面积为 82.9%(95%CI 80.4%至 85.4%)。建议的截断值≥4 最适合用于确诊哮喘(特异性 83.1%,阳性预测值 62.4%,准确性 78%)。同样,建议的截断值<2 最适合用于排除哮喘(敏感性 92.7%,阴性预测值 93.7%,准确性 60.5%)。

结论

A2 评分是一种在初级保健人群中识别哮喘患者的有用工具。

临床试验注册号

NCT0516961。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63f4/11867667/0659a9ba79f9/bmjopen-14-11-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63f4/11867667/f683d6bdc1fa/bmjopen-14-11-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63f4/11867667/0659a9ba79f9/bmjopen-14-11-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63f4/11867667/f683d6bdc1fa/bmjopen-14-11-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63f4/11867667/0659a9ba79f9/bmjopen-14-11-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of the adult asthma epidemiological score: a secondary analysis of the EPI-ASTHMA population-based study.成人哮喘流行病学评分的验证:基于人群的 EPI-ASTHMA 研究的二次分析。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 2;14(11):e086493. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086493.
2
Adult Asthma Scores-Development and Validation of Multivariable Scores to Identify Asthma in Surveys.成人哮喘评分——多变量评分在调查中识别哮喘的开发和验证。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019 Jan;7(1):183-190.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2018.06.024. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
3
Prevalence of asthma in Portuguese adults - the EPI-ASTHMA study, a nationwide population-based survey.葡萄牙成年人哮喘患病率——EPI-ASTHMA研究,一项基于全国人口的调查。
Pulmonology. 2025 Dec 31;31(1):2466920. doi: 10.1080/25310429.2025.2466920. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
4
Development and validation of a set of patient reported outcome measures to assess effectiveness of asthma prophylaxis.开发和验证一套患者报告结局测量工具,以评估哮喘预防的效果。
BMC Pulm Med. 2021 Sep 17;21(1):295. doi: 10.1186/s12890-021-01665-6.
5
Transient elastography for diagnosis of stages of hepatic fibrosis and cirrhosis in people with alcoholic liver disease.瞬时弹性成像技术用于诊断酒精性肝病患者的肝纤维化和肝硬化分期。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 22;1(1):CD010542. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010542.pub2.
6
Ruling out coronary artery disease in primary care: development and validation of a simple prediction rule.基层医疗中心排除冠状动脉疾病:简单预测规则的制定与验证。
CMAJ. 2010 Sep 7;182(12):1295-300. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.100212. Epub 2010 Jul 5.
7
Measurement of asthma control according to Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines: a comparison with the Asthma Control Questionnaire.根据全球哮喘倡议指南测量哮喘控制情况:与哮喘控制问卷的比较。
Respir Res. 2012 Jun 22;13(1):50. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-13-50.
8
Diagnostic Accuracy and Acceptability of the Primary Care Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Screen for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fifth Edition) Among US Veterans.美国退伍军人中用于《精神障碍诊断与统计手册(第五版)》的初级保健创伤后应激障碍筛查的诊断准确性和可接受性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2036733. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.36733.
9
Development, validation, and prognostic evaluation of LiverPRO for the prediction of significant liver fibrosis in primary care: a prospective cohort study.用于基层医疗中预测显著肝纤维化的LiverPRO的开发、验证及预后评估:一项前瞻性队列研究
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Jan;10(1):55-67. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00274-7.
10
Development of a Symptom-Based Tool for Screening of Children at High Risk of Preschool Asthma.基于症状的学龄前哮喘高危儿童筛查工具的研制。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Oct 3;5(10):e2234714. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.34714.

本文引用的文献

1
Global Burden of Asthma, and Its Impact on Specific Subgroups: Nasal Polyps, Allergic Rhinitis, Severe Asthma, Eosinophilic Asthma.哮喘的全球负担及其对特定亚组的影响:鼻息肉、过敏性鼻炎、重度哮喘、嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘。
J Asthma Allergy. 2023 Oct 6;16:1097-1113. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S418145. eCollection 2023.
2
Global, regional, and national burden of asthma and its attributable risk factors from 1990 to 2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.全球、区域和国家哮喘负担及其归因风险因素:2019 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Respir Res. 2023 Jun 23;24(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s12931-023-02475-6.
3
EPI-ASTHMA study protocol: a population-based multicentre stepwise study on the prevalence and characterisation of patients with asthma according to disease severity in Portugal.
EPI-ASTHMA 研究方案:一项基于人群的、多中心的、逐步研究,旨在根据疾病严重程度调查葡萄牙哮喘患者的患病率和特征。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 19;12(9):e064538. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064538.
4
Trends in worldwide asthma prevalence.全球哮喘患病率的趋势。
Eur Respir J. 2020 Dec 24;56(6). doi: 10.1183/13993003.02094-2020. Print 2020 Dec.
5
Adult Asthma Scores-Development and Validation of Multivariable Scores to Identify Asthma in Surveys.成人哮喘评分——多变量评分在调查中识别哮喘的开发和验证。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019 Jan;7(1):183-190.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2018.06.024. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
6
COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures.COSMIN 患者报告结局测量系统评价指南。
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1147-1157. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
7
STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration.《STARD 2015诊断准确性研究报告指南:解释与详述》
BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 14;6(11):e012799. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012799.
8
On determining the most appropriate test cut-off value: the case of tests with continuous results.关于确定最合适的检测临界值:连续结果检测的情况
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2016 Oct 15;26(3):297-307. doi: 10.11613/BM.2016.034.
9
A New Approach for Identifying Patients with Undiagnosed Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.一种识别未确诊慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的新方法。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Mar 15;195(6):748-756. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201603-0622OC.
10
Diagnostic accuracy of screening tests for COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis.慢性阻塞性肺疾病筛查试验的诊断准确性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2015 Oct 8;5(10):e008133. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008133.