Suppr超能文献

成人哮喘流行病学评分的验证:基于人群的 EPI-ASTHMA 研究的二次分析。

Validation of the adult asthma epidemiological score: a secondary analysis of the EPI-ASTHMA population-based study.

机构信息

University of Porto Faculty of Medicine, Porto, Portugal.

CINTESIS@RISE, Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision25 Sciences (MEDCIDS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 2;14(11):e086493. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086493.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The A2 score is an eight-question patient-reported outcome measure that has been validated for ruling in (score ≥4) and ruling out (score 0-1) asthma. However, this screening tool has been validated in a cohort similar to the derivation cohort used. This study aims to validate the predictive accuracy of the A2 score in a primary care population against general practitioner (GP) clinical assessment and to determine whether the proposed cut-offs are the most appropriate.

DESIGN

This accuracy study is a secondary analysis of the EPI-ASTHMA population-based study.

SETTING

Primary care centres in Portugal.

PARTICIPANTS

Random adult participants answered the A2 score by phone interview.

OUTCOMES

Those with an A2 score ≥1 (plus 5% with an A2 score of 0) were invited to a diagnostic visit carried out by a GP to confirm or not a diagnosis of asthma. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

RESULTS

A total of 1283 participants (median 54 (p25-p75 43-66) years; 60% women) were analysed. The A2 score showed high discriminatory power in identifying asthma, with an area under the ROC curve of 82.9% (95% CI 80.4% to 85.4%). The proposed cut-off ≥4 was the most appropriate to rule in asthma (specificity 83.1%, positive predictive value 62.4%, accuracy 78%). Similarly, the proposed cut-off<2 was the most suitable for excluding asthma (sensitivity 92.7%, negative predictive value 93.7%, accuracy 60.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

The A2 score is a useful tool to identify patients with asthma in a primary care population.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT0516961.

摘要

目的

A2 评分是一种包含八个问题的患者报告结局测量工具,已在临床上验证用于确诊(评分≥4)和排除(评分 0-1)哮喘。然而,该筛查工具仅在与推导队列相似的队列中得到验证。本研究旨在验证 A2 评分在初级保健人群中用于临床医生(GP)评估的预测准确性,并确定所提出的截断值是否最合适。

设计

这是一项基于 EPI-ASTHMA 人群的研究的准确性研究的二次分析。

地点

葡萄牙的基层医疗中心。

参与者

随机成年参与者通过电话采访回答 A2 评分。

结果

A2 评分≥1(加上 5%的 A2 评分为 0)的患者被邀请参加由 GP 进行的诊断访问,以确认或排除哮喘诊断。使用接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线评估诊断准确性。

结果

共分析了 1283 名参与者(中位数 54(p25-p75 43-66)岁;60%为女性)。A2 评分在识别哮喘方面具有很高的区分能力,ROC 曲线下面积为 82.9%(95%CI 80.4%至 85.4%)。建议的截断值≥4 最适合用于确诊哮喘(特异性 83.1%,阳性预测值 62.4%,准确性 78%)。同样,建议的截断值<2 最适合用于排除哮喘(敏感性 92.7%,阴性预测值 93.7%,准确性 60.5%)。

结论

A2 评分是一种在初级保健人群中识别哮喘患者的有用工具。

临床试验注册号

NCT0516961。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63f4/11867667/f683d6bdc1fa/bmjopen-14-11-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验