• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparing the frequency, antifungal susceptibility, and enzymatic profiles of the oral fungal composition in patients with and without Alzheimer's disease admitted to a neurology clinic.比较神经内科就诊的阿尔茨海默病患者和非阿尔茨海默病患者口腔真菌组成的频率、抗真菌药物敏感性和酶谱。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2024 Oct 18;14:1477230. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1477230. eCollection 2024.
2
Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of virulence markers and antifungal susceptibility of oral Candida species from diabetic and non-diabetic hemodialysis patients.从糖尿病和非糖尿病血液透析患者的口腔念珠菌中进行表型和基因型毒力标志物特征分析及抗真菌药敏试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 May 4;23(1):261. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-02970-8.
3
Iranian HIV/AIDS patients with oropharyngeal candidiasis: identification, prevalence and antifungal susceptibility of Candida species.患有口咽念珠菌病的伊朗艾滋病毒/艾滋病患者:念珠菌属的鉴定、患病率及抗真菌药敏性
Lett Appl Microbiol. 2018 Oct;67(4):392-399. doi: 10.1111/lam.13052. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
4
Candida and candidaemia. Susceptibility and epidemiology.念珠菌与念珠菌血症。药敏性与流行病学。
Dan Med J. 2013 Nov;60(11):B4698.
5
In vitro susceptibility of Candida albicans clinical isolates to eight antifungal agents in Ouagadougou (Burkina Faso).在瓦加杜古(布基纳法索)对 8 种抗真菌药物的白色念珠菌临床分离株的体外敏感性。
J Mycol Med. 2017 Dec;27(4):469-475. doi: 10.1016/j.mycmed.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
6
[INVESTIGATION ON ANTIFUNGAL SUSCEPTIBILITY OF CANDIDA YEASTS IN PREGNANT PATIENTS WITH CONFIRMED VULVOVAGINAL CANDIDIASIS AND THEIR NEWBORNS.].[确诊外阴阴道念珠菌病的孕妇及其新生儿念珠菌酵母菌的抗真菌药敏性调查。]
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia). 2016;55(4):20-29.
7
Epidemiology and Antifungal Susceptibility of Species Isolated from 10 Tertiary Care Hospitals in Iran.伊朗 10 家三级护理医院分离的 种的流行病学和抗真菌药敏性。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Dec 21;10(6):e0245322. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02453-22. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
8
antifungal susceptibility of yeasts and molds isolated from sputum of tuberculosis relapse and retreatment patients.从肺结核复发和复治患者的痰中分离出的酵母菌和霉菌的抗真菌药敏性。
Pan Afr Med J. 2021 Mar 1;38:227. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2021.38.227.26485. eCollection 2021.
9
activities of nine antifungal agents against rare pathogenic fungi.九种抗真菌药物对罕见致病性真菌的活性。
J Med Microbiol. 2019 Nov;68(11):1664-1670. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.001083. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
10
Colonization of the oral cavity by yeasts in patients with chronic renal failure undergoing hemodialysis.慢性肾衰竭行血液透析患者口腔酵母菌定植。
J Oral Pathol Med. 2013 Mar;42(3):229-34. doi: 10.1111/jop.12003. Epub 2012 Sep 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Association Between Oral Microbiota Dysbiosis and the Risk of Dementia: A Systematic Review.口腔微生物群失调与痴呆风险之间的关联:一项系统综述。
Dent J (Basel). 2025 May 22;13(6):227. doi: 10.3390/dj13060227.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of species distribution and virulence factors of oral fungal carriage among hospitalized patients with COVID-19: a case-control study.COVID-19住院患者口腔真菌携带的物种分布和毒力因子评估:一项病例对照研究
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024 Apr 4;86(5):2458-2466. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001956. eCollection 2024 May.
2
Stability of human gut microbiome: Comparison of ecological modelling and observational approaches.人类肠道微生物群的稳定性:生态建模与观察方法的比较
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2023 Aug 29;21:4456-4468. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2023.08.030. eCollection 2023.
3
Reviving the interest in the versatile drug nystatin: A multitude of strategies to increase its potential as an effective and safe antifungal agent.重新唤起对多面手药物制霉菌素的兴趣:多种策略提高其作为有效和安全抗真菌药物的潜力。
Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2023 Aug;199:114969. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2023.114969. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
4
Antifungal Drug Resistance: An Emergent Health Threat.抗真菌药物耐药性:一种新出现的健康威胁。
Biomedicines. 2023 Mar 31;11(4):1063. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11041063.
5
Oral microbiome in older adults with mild cognitive impairment.轻度认知障碍老年人的口腔微生物群
J Oral Microbiol. 2023 Feb 1;15(1):2173544. doi: 10.1080/20002297.2023.2173544. eCollection 2023.
6
Immune responses to human fungal pathogens and therapeutic prospects.人类真菌病原体的免疫反应和治疗前景。
Nat Rev Immunol. 2023 Jul;23(7):433-452. doi: 10.1038/s41577-022-00826-w. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
7
Nystatin Effectiveness in Oral Candidiasis Treatment: A Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials.制霉菌素治疗口腔念珠菌病的有效性:一项临床试验的系统评价与荟萃分析
Life (Basel). 2022 Oct 22;12(11):1677. doi: 10.3390/life12111677.
8
Hemolysis, free hemoglobin toxicity, and scavenger protein therapeutics.溶血、游离血红蛋白毒性和清除蛋白治疗学。
Blood. 2022 Oct 27;140(17):1837-1844. doi: 10.1182/blood.2022015596.
9
Prevalence and Antifungal Susceptibility Profile of Oral spp. Isolates from a Hospital in Slovakia.斯洛伐克一家医院口腔 分离株的流行状况和抗真菌药敏谱。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Apr 22;58(5):576. doi: 10.3390/medicina58050576.
10
The Oral Microbiota: Community Composition, Influencing Factors, Pathogenesis, and Interventions.口腔微生物群:群落组成、影响因素、发病机制及干预措施
Front Microbiol. 2022 Apr 29;13:895537. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.895537. eCollection 2022.

比较神经内科就诊的阿尔茨海默病患者和非阿尔茨海默病患者口腔真菌组成的频率、抗真菌药物敏感性和酶谱。

Comparing the frequency, antifungal susceptibility, and enzymatic profiles of the oral fungal composition in patients with and without Alzheimer's disease admitted to a neurology clinic.

机构信息

Cellular and Molecular Research Center, School of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.

Department of Medical Parasitology and Mycology, School of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.

出版信息

Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2024 Oct 18;14:1477230. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1477230. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fcimb.2024.1477230
PMID:39492992
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11527782/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Studies have shown that changes in the frequency of oral microorganisms may play a key role in the development of Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, no research has been conducted on the oral fungal composition in AD-patients. The present study aimed to investigate the changes in the frequency of oral fungal composition, the antifungal susceptibility, and the enzymatic profiles of oral fungal composition in patients suffering from AD compared to non-AD individuals.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In the present analytical cross-sectional study during 12 months, 76 hospitalized patients with AD were matched with 76 individuals without AD. A sterile serum physiology-moistened cotton-tipped swab was used to sample the mouth area. All swabs were cultured on Sabouraud Chloramphenicol Agar. Fungal identified were confirmed through the PCR-sequencing techniques. Enzyme activity index (EAI) for important pathogenic factors including proteinase, esterase and hemolysin was measured using relevant protocols. The susceptibility to 8 antifungal agents (nystatin, voriconazole, itraconazole, fluconazole, posaconazole, amphotericin B, 5-fluorocytosine, and caspofungin) against fungal strains obtained from AD-patients was evaluated according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines, document M38-A2 for filamentous fungi, and document M27-A4 for yeasts.

RESULTS

The results showed that compared to the non-AD individuals, the prevalence of oral fungal composition in AD group was 1.6 times higher. was the most common fungal species isolated from oral swab samples of AD group (n=53, 80%) and non-AD group (n=28, 40%), and the diversity of the oral fungal composition in AD-patients were lower than non-AD individuals. Among the 3 investigated virulence factors, a statistically significant difference was shown in terms of hemolysin activity level between the two studied groups (<0.05) and the activity level of esterase and proteinase enzymes did not show a significant difference in the two studied groups (>0.05). The results showed that almost all of the tested isolates were susceptible to nystatin, the most widely prescribed antifungal to treat superficial infections, and only 1.69 % (2/118) of the isolates were resistant to this antifungal drug.

CONCLUSION

Understanding the changes in the frequency of oral fungal composition the antifungal susceptibility, and the enzymatic profiles of oral fungal composition in patients suffering from AD compared to non-AD individuals makes it possible to better understand the etiology of this disease.

摘要

背景

研究表明,口腔微生物频率的变化可能在阿尔茨海默病(AD)的发展中起关键作用。然而,目前还没有研究过 AD 患者的口腔真菌组成。本研究旨在调查 AD 患者与非 AD 个体相比,口腔真菌组成的频率变化、抗真菌药物敏感性以及口腔真菌组成的酶谱。

材料和方法

在本研究中,采用 12 个月的分析性横断面研究,将 76 名住院 AD 患者与 76 名非 AD 个体相匹配。使用无菌血清生理湿润的棉签拭子采集口腔区域样本。所有拭子均在沙保罗氯霉素琼脂上培养。通过 PCR 测序技术确认真菌鉴定。使用相关方案测量包括蛋白酶、酯酶和溶血素在内的重要致病因素的酶活性指数(EAI)。根据临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)指南、丝状真菌的 M38-A2 文件和酵母的 M27-A4 文件,评估从 AD 患者获得的真菌菌株对 8 种抗真菌药物(制霉菌素、伏立康唑、伊曲康唑、氟康唑、泊沙康唑、两性霉素 B、5-氟胞嘧啶和卡泊芬净)的敏感性。

结果

结果表明,与非 AD 个体相比,AD 组的口腔真菌组成患病率高 1.6 倍。是从 AD 组(n=53,80%)和非 AD 组(n=28,40%)口腔拭子样本中分离出的最常见真菌物种,AD 患者的口腔真菌组成多样性低于非 AD 个体。在所研究的 3 种毒力因子中,两组之间溶血素活性水平存在统计学差异(<0.05),而酯酶和蛋白酶酶活性水平在两组之间无显著差异(>0.05)。结果表明,几乎所有测试的分离物对最广泛用于治疗浅表感染的抗真菌药物制霉菌素均敏感,只有 1.69%(2/118)的分离物对该抗真菌药物耐药。

结论

了解 AD 患者与非 AD 个体相比口腔真菌组成的频率变化、抗真菌药物敏感性以及口腔真菌组成的酶谱,可以更好地了解这种疾病的病因。