• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与左心耳封堵术后器械相关血栓形成相关的血流动力学因素

Flow Dynamic Factors Correlated With Device-Related Thrombosis After Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion.

作者信息

Vogl Brennan J, Vitale Emily, Ahn Sunyoung, Sularz Agata, Chavez Ponce Alejandra, Lo Russo Gerardo V, Collins Jeremy, Bavo Alessandra Maria, El Shaer Ahmed, Kramer Anders, Jia Yuheng, Lulic Davorka, De Beule Matthieu, Nielsen-Kudsk Jens Erik, De Backer Ole, Alkhouli Mohamad, Hatoum Hoda

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, Michigan, USA.

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

JACC Adv. 2024 Oct 15;3(11):101339. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101339. eCollection 2024 Nov.

DOI:10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101339
PMID:39493311
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11530902/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Device-related thrombosis (DRT) occurs in up to 4% of patients undergoing left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) and is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. However, its pathophysiology, predictors, and optimal management remain unclear.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to assess flow dynamic factors correlating to DRT.

METHODS

A multicenter registry of patients who underwent LAAO and had pre- and post-computed tomography imaging was used. Patient-specific 3-dimensional digital models of the left atrium were created, and finite element simulations were performed to implant an LAAO device into each model in a position that matched the clinical deployment. Computational fluid dynamic simulations were performed to quantify the following flow dynamic parameters: time averaged wall shear stress, oscillatory shear index, and endothelial cell activation potential.

RESULTS

A total of 38 patients (19 with DRT and 19 without DRT) were included. Left atrium volumes and mitral valve areas were larger in the DRT cohort compared with controls. Patients with DRT had a significantly lower time averaged wall shear stress (1.76 ± 1.24 Pa vs 2.90 ± 2.70 Pa), a higher oscillatory shear index (0.19 ± 0.11 vs 0.17 ± 0.11), and a higher endothelial cell activation potential (0.23 ± 0.58 Pa vs 0.17 ± 0.30 Pa) than the controls ( < 0.001 for all). Thrombus locations identified from in-vivo images correlated well with the flow dynamic parameters tested.

CONCLUSIONS

Flow dynamic parameters may be able to predict the risk of DRT after LAAO. Further investigation with a larger patient cohort and long-term follow-up is needed to assess the role of computational fluid dynamics in the risk stratification of patients considered for LAAO.

摘要

背景

与装置相关的血栓形成(DRT)在接受左心耳封堵术(LAAO)的患者中发生率高达4%,并与显著的发病率和死亡率相关。然而,其病理生理学、预测因素和最佳管理仍不清楚。

目的

本研究旨在评估与DRT相关的血流动力学因素。

方法

使用一个多中心登记库,纳入接受LAAO并进行了术前和术后计算机断层扫描成像的患者。创建了患者特异性的左心房三维数字模型,并进行有限元模拟,将LAAO装置植入每个模型中与临床部署相匹配的位置。进行计算流体动力学模拟以量化以下血流动力学参数:时间平均壁面剪应力、振荡剪应力指数和内皮细胞激活潜能。

结果

共纳入38例患者(19例发生DRT,19例未发生DRT)。与对照组相比,DRT队列中的左心房容积和二尖瓣面积更大。发生DRT的患者的时间平均壁面剪应力显著更低(1.76±1.24 Pa vs 2.90±2.70 Pa),振荡剪应力指数更高(0.19±0.11 vs 0.17±0.11),内皮细胞激活潜能更高(0.23±0.58 Pa vs 0.17±0.30 Pa),与对照组相比差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.001)。从体内图像确定的血栓位置与所测试的血流动力学参数相关性良好。

结论

血流动力学参数可能能够预测LAAO术后DRT的风险。需要对更大的患者队列进行进一步研究并进行长期随访,以评估计算流体动力学在考虑接受LAAO的患者风险分层中的作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4979/11530902/efa97e4f6d81/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4979/11530902/efa97e4f6d81/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4979/11530902/e8306c05452b/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4979/11530902/6104ebcdec67/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4979/11530902/efa97e4f6d81/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4979/11530902/efa97e4f6d81/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4979/11530902/e8306c05452b/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4979/11530902/6104ebcdec67/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4979/11530902/efa97e4f6d81/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Flow Dynamic Factors Correlated With Device-Related Thrombosis After Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion.与左心耳封堵术后器械相关血栓形成相关的血流动力学因素
JACC Adv. 2024 Oct 15;3(11):101339. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101339. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Predictors of Device-Related Thrombus Following Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion.经皮左心耳封堵术后器械相关血栓的预测因素。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Jul 27;78(4):297-313. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.04.098.
3
Impact of left atrial appendage occlusion device position on potential determinants of device-related thrombus: a patient-specific in silico study.经皮左心耳封堵装置位置对装置相关血栓潜在决定因素的影响:一项基于患者个体的计算机模拟研究。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2024 Oct;113(10):1405-1418. doi: 10.1007/s00392-023-02228-x. Epub 2023 Jun 9.
4
Impact of Device Implant Depth After Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion.左心耳封堵术后装置植入深度的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Sep 11;16(17):2139-2149. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.05.045. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
5
Risk of device-related thrombosis following short-term oral anticoagulation with low-dose dabigatran versus warfarin after Watchman left atrial appendage occlusion.服用低剂量达比加群酯与华法林进行短期抗凝治疗后行 Watchman 左心耳封堵术的患者发生器械相关血栓的风险。
Sci Prog. 2022 Jul-Sep;105(3):368504221113194. doi: 10.1177/00368504221113194.
6
Late-onset left atrial appendage occlusion device-related thrombus attributed to mitral bioprosthetic stenosis: a case report.迟发性左心耳封堵装置相关血栓归因于二尖瓣生物瓣狭窄:一例报告
Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2024 Aug 23;8(9):ytae438. doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytae438. eCollection 2024 Sep.
7
Optimal Antithrombotic Regimen in Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: The Gordian Knot?左心耳封堵术中的最佳抗栓方案:难解之结?
Pharmacology. 2023;108(2):199-203. doi: 10.1159/000527603. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
8
Incidence and Clinical Impact of Device-Related Thrombus Following Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: A Meta-Analysis.经皮左心耳封堵术后器械相关血栓形成的发生率及临床影响:一项荟萃分析。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018 Dec;4(12):1629-1637. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2018.09.007. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
9
Impact of occluder device configurations in in-silico left atrial hemodynamics for the analysis of device-related thrombus.用于分析器械相关血栓的左心房血流动力学的封堵器装置结构的影响。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 Sep 26;20(9):e1011546. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011546. eCollection 2024 Sep.
10
Incidence, Characterization, and Clinical Impact of Device-Related Thrombus Following Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in the Prospective Global AMPLATZER Amulet Observational Study.在前瞻性全球 AMPLATZER Amulet 观察研究中左心耳封堵术后器械相关血栓的发生率、特征及临床影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jun 10;12(11):1003-1014. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.02.003. Epub 2019 May 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Design and Validation of a High-Fidelity Left Atrial Cardiac Simulator for the Study and Advancement of Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion.用于左心耳封堵研究与进展的高保真左心房心脏模拟器的设计与验证
Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2025 Jun;16(3):279-295. doi: 10.1007/s13239-025-00773-2. Epub 2025 Jan 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding the role of the left atrial appendage on the flow in the atrium.理解左心耳在心房内血流中的作用。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Nov;104(6):1290-1298. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31153. Epub 2024 Jul 20.
2
Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: Current Advances and Remaining Challenges.左心耳封堵术:当前进展与尚存挑战
JACC Adv. 2022 Nov 16;1(5):100136. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2022.100136. eCollection 2022 Dec.
3
Persistent and Recurrent Device-Related Thrombus After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Incidence, Predictors, and Outcomes.
左心耳封堵术后持续性和复发性器械相关血栓:发生率、预测因素和结局。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Nov 27;16(22):2722-2732. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.09.017.
4
Device-Related Thrombus After Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: Clinical Impact, Predictors, Classification, and Management.左心耳封堵术后器械相关血栓:临床影响、预测因素、分类和管理。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Nov 27;16(22):2695-2707. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.10.046.
5
Impact of Device Implant Depth After Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion.左心耳封堵术后装置植入深度的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Sep 11;16(17):2139-2149. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.05.045. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
6
Impact of left atrial appendage occlusion device position on potential determinants of device-related thrombus: a patient-specific in silico study.经皮左心耳封堵装置位置对装置相关血栓潜在决定因素的影响:一项基于患者个体的计算机模拟研究。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2024 Oct;113(10):1405-1418. doi: 10.1007/s00392-023-02228-x. Epub 2023 Jun 9.
7
Computational Modeling to Guide Structural Heart Interventions: Measure Twice (or Thrice) But Cut Once.指导结构性心脏病介入治疗的计算模型:三思而后行。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Mar 27;16(6):667-669. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.01.006. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
8
Preliminary findings on left atrial appendage occlusion simulations applying different endocardial devices.应用不同心内膜装置进行左心耳封堵模拟的初步研究结果。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Feb 20;10:1067964. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1067964. eCollection 2023.
9
Left atrial appendage occlusion.左心耳封堵术。
EuroIntervention. 2023 Feb 6;18(13):e1038-e1065. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00627.
10
Cardiac computed tomography following Watchman FLX implantation: device-related thrombus or device healing?经 Watchman FLX 植入后的心脏计算机断层扫描:与器械相关的血栓还是器械愈合?
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023 Jan 23;24(2):250-259. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeac222.