• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A Brief Report Comparing Younger and Older Cohabitors.比较年轻和年长同居者的简要报告。
J Marriage Fam. 2025 Jun 12. doi: 10.1111/jomf.13128.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
4
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
5
A national portrait of the well-being of remarried and previously married cohabiting older adults.一份关于再婚及曾有过同居经历的老年人幸福状况的全国性描述。
Aging Ment Health. 2025 Apr;29(4):714-725. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2024.2438834. Epub 2024 Dec 11.
6
Investigation and analysis of mental health status of the older adult in western rural areas.西部农村地区老年人心理健康状况的调查与分析
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 16;13:1612600. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1612600. eCollection 2025.
7
Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor.择期引产的母婴结局
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2009 Mar(176):1-257.
8
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of carmustine implants and temozolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.卡莫司汀植入剂与替莫唑胺治疗新诊断的高级别胶质瘤的有效性和成本效益:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(45):iii-iv, ix-221. doi: 10.3310/hta11450.
9
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
10
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.

本文引用的文献

1
Measurement opportunities for studying sexual and gender diverse partnerships in population-based surveys.在基于人群的调查中研究性取向和性别多样化伴侣关系的测量机会。
J Marriage Fam. 2024 Oct;86(5):1410-1431. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12957. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
2
Divorce, Repartnering, and Stepfamilies: A Decade in Review.离婚、再婚与继亲家庭:十年回顾
J Marriage Fam. 2020 Feb;82(1):81-99. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12651. Epub 2020 Jan 5.
3
Relationship Quality in Midlife: A Comparison of Dating, Living Apart Together, Cohabitation, and Marriage.中年时期的关系质量:约会、分开同居、同居和婚姻的比较
J Marriage Fam. 2022 Jun;84(3):860-878. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12813. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
4
Does Cohabitation Compensate for Marriage Decline?同居能否弥补婚姻衰退?
Contexts (Berkeley Calif). 2021 May;20(2):68-69. doi: 10.1177/15365042211012076. Epub 2021 May 26.
5
Young Adulthood Relationships in an Era of Uncertainty: A Case for Cohabitation.不确定时代的青年期人际关系:同居的理由。
Demography. 2020 Jun;57(3):799-819. doi: 10.1007/s13524-020-00881-9.
6
A cohort comparison of trends in first cohabitation duration in the United States.美国首次同居持续时间趋势的队列比较。
Demogr Res. 2018;38(66):2073-2086. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2018.38.66. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
7
Serial Cohabitation in Young Adulthood: Baby Boomers to Millennials.青年期的连续同居:婴儿潮一代到千禧一代。
J Marriage Fam. 2018 Aug;80(4):826-840. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12495. Epub 2018 May 18.
8
Relationship Quality Among Older Cohabitors: A Comparison to Remarrieds.老年同居者的关系质量:与再婚者的比较。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2020 Sep 14;75(8):1808-1817. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbz069.
9
Change in the Stability of First Premarital Cohabitation Among Women in the United States, 1983-2013.美国女性婚前同居稳定性的变化,1983-2013 年。
Demography. 2019 Apr;56(2):427-450. doi: 10.1007/s13524-019-00765-7.
10
Marriage, Cohabitation, and Divorce in Later Life.晚年的婚姻、同居与离婚
Innov Aging. 2017 Sep 13;1(2):igx015. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igx015. eCollection 2017 Sep.

比较年轻和年长同居者的简要报告。

A Brief Report Comparing Younger and Older Cohabitors.

作者信息

Wright Matthew R, Brown Susan L, Manning Wendy D, Flowers Madelyn, Ward Jenna M

机构信息

Department of Sociology, 204D Chapell Wilson Hall, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC 28608.

Department of Sociology, 239 Williams Hall, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH 43403.

出版信息

J Marriage Fam. 2025 Jun 12. doi: 10.1111/jomf.13128.

DOI:10.1111/jomf.13128
PMID:40857534
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12362635/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study examined age variation in relationship quality and stability, plans to marry, and reasons to cohabit among cohabiting adults in the U.S.

BACKGROUND

The landscape of cohabitation has changed in the past few decades as cohabitation has surged among older adults even as it has plateaued among younger people. Early research revealed key age-related variations in the meaning and relationship dynamics of cohabiting unions, but whether these patterns persist nowadays remains an empirical question.

METHOD

Data were drawn from the nationally representative 2013 Families and Relationships Survey. The analytic sample was composed of cohabiting adults aged 18-65. Multivariable models investigated age group differences in relationship quality and stability, plans to marry, and reasons to cohabit net of relationship, demographic, and economic factors.

RESULTS

As expected, relationship quality and stability tended to be higher among older than younger cohabitors. Older cohabitors were the least likely to have plans to marry and to view testing marital compatibility as an important reason for cohabiting.

CONCLUSION

Cohabitation appears to operate differently across the adult life course, functioning primarily as a prelude to marriage or alternative to singlehood earlier in the life course versus an alternative to marriage in later life.

摘要

目的

本研究考察了美国同居成年人在关系质量与稳定性、结婚计划以及同居原因方面的年龄差异。

背景

在过去几十年里,同居的情况发生了变化,同居现象在老年人中激增,而在年轻人中则趋于平稳。早期研究揭示了同居关系在意义和关系动态方面与年龄相关的关键差异,但这些模式如今是否仍然存在仍是一个实证问题。

方法

数据取自具有全国代表性的2013年家庭与关系调查。分析样本由18至65岁的同居成年人组成。多变量模型研究了在考虑关系、人口统计学和经济因素的情况下,不同年龄组在关系质量与稳定性、结婚计划以及同居原因方面的差异。

结果

正如预期的那样,年龄较大的同居者的关系质量和稳定性往往高于年龄较小的同居者。年龄较大的同居者结婚的计划最少,并且最不可能将测试婚姻兼容性视为同居的重要原因。

结论

同居在成年人的生命历程中似乎有着不同的作用,在生命历程早期主要作为结婚的前奏或单身的替代选择,而在晚年则作为婚姻的替代选择。