Suppr超能文献

言行一致:外科亚专业中性别与种族多样性的系统评价

Aligning our actions with our words: A systematic review of gender and racial diversity in surgical subspecialties.

作者信息

Lewis Joshua E, Pride Lornee C, Luk Hannah G, Oyejide Kafayat, Wilson Isha M, Tawiah Winston E, Watkins Cale M, Lee Wei-Chen

机构信息

John Sealy School of Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.

Howard University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

J Med Access. 2024 Nov 2;8:27550834241293022. doi: 10.1177/27550834241293022. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Persistent racial and gender disparities are prevalent within the higher education and medical training system, notably seen in the underrepresentation of Hispanic or Latinos, Black Americans, and female surgeons compared to their respective population proportions. This study aims to quantify publications addressing ethnic or gender diversity across various surgical specialties, analyze publication trends, and explore specific topics within medical literature.

DATABASE

The Database includes PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus.

METHODS

Employing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), we conducted a systematic literature review utilizing the PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus databases. A broad inclusion criterion for both ethnic and gender diversity of plastic surgery, neurosurgery, otolaryngology, dermatology, orthopedic surgery, and gender surgery was utilized. The literature was selected between 2014 and 2024. In the content of our study, diversity in articles was defined as any article that focused on addressing gender or racial/ethnicity in the subspecialty.

RESULTS

Of 1529 initially screened articles, 346 were included. Orthopedic surgery had the most diversity publications (n = 86), followed by general surgery (n = 67) and plastic surgery (n = 51). Significant increases in diversity publications were observed across all specialties. Orthopedic surgery showed the highest growth (+0.17 publications/year, p < 0.001), followed by plastic surgery (+0.12, p = 0.002) and general surgery (+0.11, p = 0.003). Race/ethnicity was the primary focus (51.4%), with fewer articles on gender (19.7%) or both (28.9%). Diversity topics included demographics, pipeline/recruitment, application process, training experience, leadership, and workplace treatment.

CONCLUSION

These insights underscore the importance of continued efforts to promote diversity within surgical specialties to enhance patient care and outcomes. Further research and initiatives are needed to ensure equitable representation in surgical fields. Addressing diversity issues in surgical specialties is essential for improving healthcare outcomes and reducing disparities.

摘要

引言

在高等教育和医学培训体系中,持续存在的种族和性别差异普遍存在,特别是与各自的人口比例相比,西班牙裔或拉丁裔、美国黑人以及女外科医生的代表性不足。本研究旨在量化涉及各个外科专业中种族或性别多样性的出版物,分析出版趋势,并探索医学文献中的特定主题。

数据库

该数据库包括PubMed、谷歌学术和Scopus。

方法

我们采用系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA),利用PubMed、谷歌学术和Scopus数据库进行了系统的文献综述。对整形外科、神经外科、耳鼻喉科、皮肤科、骨科和性别手术的种族和性别多样性采用了广泛的纳入标准。文献选取时间为2014年至2024年。在我们的研究内容中,文章中的多样性被定义为任何关注亚专业中性别或种族/民族问题的文章。

结果

在最初筛选的1529篇文章中,有346篇被纳入。骨科的多样性出版物最多(n = 86),其次是普通外科(n = 67)和整形外科(n = 51)。所有专业的多样性出版物都有显著增加。骨科的增长最为显著(+0.17篇/年,p < 0.001),其次是整形外科(+0.12,p = 0.002)和普通外科(+0.11,p = 0.003)。种族/民族是主要关注点(51.4%),关于性别的文章较少(19.7%),两者都涉及的文章占28.9%。多样性主题包括人口统计学、人才培养渠道/招聘、申请流程、培训经历、领导力和工作场所待遇。

结论

这些见解强调了持续努力促进外科专业多样性以提高患者护理和治疗效果的重要性。需要进一步的研究和举措来确保外科领域的公平代表性。解决外科专业中的多样性问题对于改善医疗保健结果和减少差距至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bc7/11531004/78ef81236d5c/10.1177_27550834241293022-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验