Suppr超能文献

Meta 分析在脊柱融合术后竖脊肌平面阻滞的疗效。

Meta-analysis of the efficacy of the erector spinae plane block after spinal fusion surgery.

机构信息

Department of Sports Medicine, Nanbu People's Hospital (Spine, Upper Limb Orthopedics, Sports Medicine), Nanchong, China.

Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Nanchong Central Hospital, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Nanchong, China.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2024 Oct 30;12:e18332. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18332. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy of erector spinal plane block (ESPB) after spinal fusion surgery in this study.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, and Web of Science databases were searched with a search deadline of March 30, 2024, and Stata 15.0 was used to analyze the data from the included studies.

RESULT

Nine randomized controlled trials involving 663 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that EPSB could reduce pain scores at 2h (standard mean difference (SMD) = -0.78, 95% CI [-1.38 to -0.19], GRADE: Moderate), 6 h (SMD = -0.81, 95% CI [-1.23 to -0.38], GRADE: Moderate), 12 h (SMD = -0.59, 95% CI [-1.05 to -0.13], GRADE: Moderate), 24 h (SMD = -0.54, 95% CI [-0.86 to -0.21], GRADE: Moderate), 48 h (SMD = -0.40, 95% CI [-0.75 to -0.05], GRADE: Moderate) after spinal fusion surgery, as well as the PCA (analgesia medication use) (SMD = -1.67, 95% CI [-2.67 to -0.67], GRADE: Moderate). However, EPSB had no effect on intraoperative blood loss (SMD = -0.28, 95% CI [-1.03 to 0.47], GRADE: Low) and length of hospital stay (SMD = -0.27, 95% CI [-0.60-0.06], GRADE: Low).

CONCLUSION

Combined with the current findings, EPSB may reduce pain scores in spinal fusion surgery, possibly reducing the use of postoperative analgesics. However, due to the limitations of the study, we need more high-quality, multi-center, large sample randomized controlled trials to merge.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨脊柱融合术后竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)的疗效。

方法

检索 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆和 Web of Science 数据库,检索截止日期为 2024 年 3 月 30 日,采用 Stata 15.0 对纳入研究进行数据分析。

结果

纳入 9 项随机对照试验,共 663 例患者。Meta 分析显示,ESPB 可降低术后 2 h(标准均数差(SMD)=-0.78,95%CI[-1.38 至-0.19],GRADE:中度)、6 h(SMD=-0.81,95%CI[-1.23 至-0.38],GRADE:中度)、12 h(SMD=-0.59,95%CI[-1.05 至-0.13],GRADE:中度)、24 h(SMD=-0.54,95%CI[-0.86 至-0.21],GRADE:中度)、48 h(SMD=-0.40,95%CI[-0.75 至-0.05],GRADE:中度)的疼痛评分,以及 PCA(镇痛药物使用)(SMD=-1.67,95%CI[-2.67 至-0.67],GRADE:中度)。然而,ESPB 对术中失血量(SMD=-0.28,95%CI[-1.03 至 0.47],GRADE:低)和住院时间(SMD=-0.27,95%CI[-0.60-0.06],GRADE:低)无影响。

结论

结合目前的研究结果,ESPB 可能降低脊柱融合术后的疼痛评分,可能减少术后镇痛药物的使用。然而,由于研究的局限性,我们需要更多高质量、多中心、大样本的随机对照试验来合并。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d93/11531255/65ae6232de6a/peerj-12-18332-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验