Suppr超能文献

院外心脏骤停中骨内和静脉内肾上腺素给药途径:生存和神经结局。

Intraosseous and Intravenous Epinephrine Administration Routes in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Survival and Neurologic Outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou and College of Medicine, Chang Gung University Taoyuan Taiwan.

Department of Emergency Medicine Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Taipei Branch Taipei Taiwan.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Nov 5;13(21):e036739. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.036739. Epub 2024 Nov 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The rate of survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest varies depending on the timeliness and effectiveness of prehospital interventions. This study was conducted to compare out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes between intravenous and intraosseous routes and between upper and lower extremity routes for drug administration.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We retrospectively analyzed data (collected using the Utstein template) from 1220 patients who had experienced out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Taiwan's Taoyuan City between January 2021 and August 2023. The patients were stratified into intravenous and intraosseous groups by treatment approach and upper and lower extremity access groups by access site. The study outcomes were survival to discharge, favorable neurologic outcomes (Cerebral Performance Category score 1 or 2), and survival for >2 hours. The study groups were statistically compared before and after propensity score matching. Significant pre-propensity score matching differences were observed between intravenous and intraosseous groups, and the aforementioned study outcomes were better in the intravenous group than in the intraosseous group. However, the between-group differences became nonsignificant after propensity score matching. Furthermore, lower extremity access and delayed epinephrine administration were associated with worse outcomes. Survival rates fell below 12.6% when time to treatment exceeded 15 minutes, particularly in the cases of intraosseous access and lower extremity access.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the benefits of early intervention and upper extremity access for drug administration in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Intraosseous access may serve as a viable alternative to intravenous access. Timely administration of essential drugs during resuscitation can improve clinical outcomes and thus has implications for emergency medical service training.

摘要

背景

院外心脏骤停后的存活率取决于院前干预的及时性和有效性。本研究旨在比较静脉和骨内途径以及给药时上肢和下肢途径的院外心脏骤停结局。

方法和结果

我们回顾性分析了 2021 年 1 月至 2023 年 8 月期间在台湾桃园市经历院外心脏骤停的 1220 名患者的数据(使用 Utstein 模板收集)。根据治疗方法将患者分为静脉和骨内组,根据进入部位将患者分为上肢和下肢进入组。研究结果为出院存活率、良好的神经功能结局(Cerebral Performance Category 评分 1 或 2)和>2 小时的存活率。在进行倾向评分匹配前后对研究组进行了统计学比较。静脉和骨内组之间存在显著的倾向性评分匹配前差异,且静脉组的上述研究结局优于骨内组。然而,匹配后组间差异不再具有统计学意义。此外,下肢进入和延迟肾上腺素给药与较差的结局相关。当治疗时间超过 15 分钟时,存活率低于 12.6%,尤其是骨内进入和下肢进入的情况。

结论

本研究强调了在院外心脏骤停患者中早期干预和上肢给药途径用于药物治疗的益处。骨内进入可能是静脉进入的可行替代方法。在复苏过程中及时给予基本药物可以改善临床结局,因此对急诊医疗服务培训具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5925/11935680/91b377720812/JAH3-13-e036739-g003.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验