Backus Elaine A, Shugart Holly J
USDA Agricultural Research Service, San Joaquin Valley Agricultural Sciences Center, Parlier, California, USA.
Department of Entomology, Citrus Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Lake Alfred, Florida, USA.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2024 Nov 20;90(11):e0110224. doi: 10.1128/aem.01102-24. Epub 2024 Nov 4.
() bacteria form biofilm on the cuticular surfaces of the functional foregut (precibarium and cibarium) of its vectors, xylem fluid-ingesting sharpshooter leafhoppers and spittlebugs. While much is known about biofilm development and maturation , little is known about these processes in vectors. Real-time (RT)-PCR was used to quantify genomes daily in the functional foreguts of blue-green sharpshooters, over 7 days of exposure to infected grapevines. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to examine biofilm formation at 4 and 7 days of that time course. PCR showed populations building and reducing over a 4-day cycle. SEM revealed that foreguts at 4 days showed variability in quantity and location of bacterial attachment. Only early-stage biofilm formation occurred in low-turbulence areas of the cibarium, while high-turbulence areas of the cibarium and precibarium had rare but older, more developed macro-colonies. Biofilm was almost absent at 7 days but left behind adhesive material and remnants of prior colonization. Evidence supports the hypothesis that bacterial colonization was repeatedly interrupted and constrained by the vector. Behaviors such as egestion and enzymatic salivation likely can loosen and eject biofilm, perhaps when profuse biofilm interferes with ingestion. Thus, vector acquisition of is a dynamic and stochastic process of interactions between bacteria and insects. We further hypothesize for future testing that the insect can regulate this interaction. A deep understanding of acquisition will aid the ongoing development of grapevine resistance to vector transmission of xylellae diseases.IMPORTANCE () is one of the most destructive invasive plant pathogens in the world, able to hijack new vectors when it invades a region; yet the temporal interplay of bacterial colonization and insect behavior is unknown. This paper describes important findings about the process of biofilm formation and maturation in a vector, contrasting similarities and differences with such formation . Results support the hypothesis that the behavior of the vector constrains and may regulate biofilm formation, in dynamic competition with the bacterium. The data from this paper partly explain why is so successful at invasion. Because the bacterium can be acquired and inoculated very quickly, it can move readily from old to new vectors and host plants in all-new environments. Our findings are relevant to biosecurity decisions because they demonstrate the importance of identifying potential vector species in the invasion front.
(某细菌)在其传播媒介——吸食木质部汁液的叶蝉和沫蝉——功能性前肠(前食窦和食窦)的角质表面形成生物膜。虽然人们对生物膜的形成和成熟了解很多,但对传播媒介中的这些过程却知之甚少。利用实时(RT)-PCR对蓝绿叶蝉功能性前肠中的基因组进行了为期7天的每日定量分析,这些叶蝉暴露于受感染的葡萄藤中。在该时间进程的第4天和第7天,使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)检查生物膜的形成情况。PCR显示菌群数量在4天的周期内先增加后减少。SEM显示,第4天的前肠中细菌附着的数量和位置存在差异。在食窦的低湍流区域仅发生早期生物膜形成,而食窦和前食窦的高湍流区域有罕见但更老、更发达的大菌落。第7天时生物膜几乎消失,但留下了粘性物质和先前定殖的残余物。有证据支持这样的假设,即细菌定殖受到传播媒介的反复干扰和限制。诸如排粪和酶促唾液分泌等行为可能会使生物膜松动并排出,也许是在大量生物膜干扰摄食时。因此,传播媒介获取(该细菌)是细菌与昆虫之间动态且随机的相互作用过程。我们进一步提出假设以供未来测试,即昆虫可以调节这种相互作用。深入了解(传播媒介获取该细菌的过程)将有助于当前培育葡萄对木质部菌病害传播媒介传播的抗性。重要性:(某细菌)是世界上最具破坏性的入侵植物病原体之一,当它侵入一个地区时能够劫持新的传播媒介;然而细菌定殖与昆虫行为的时间相互作用尚不清楚。本文描述了关于传播媒介中生物膜形成和成熟过程的重要发现,对比了与(其他生物膜)形成的异同。结果支持这样的假设,即传播媒介的行为在与细菌的动态竞争中限制并可能调节生物膜的形成。本文的数据部分解释了(该细菌)为何在入侵方面如此成功。因为这种细菌能够非常迅速地被获取和接种,它可以在全新的环境中轻易地从旧的传播媒介转移到新的传播媒介以及寄主植物上。我们的发现与生物安全决策相关,因为它们证明了在(该细菌)入侵前沿识别潜在传播媒介物种的重要性。