Suppr超能文献

哪种自我评估最适合你的教育活动?对前后测、现在与过去对比以及仅后测设计的综述。

What Type of Self-Assessment Is Best for Your Educational Activity? A Review of Pre-Post, Now-Then, and Post-Only Designs.

作者信息

Wykowski James H, Starks Helene

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.

Department of Bioethics and Humanities, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Apr;40(5):1010-1015. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-09176-w. Epub 2024 Nov 4.

Abstract

In medical education, learner self-assessments are standard methods used to evaluate the impact of curricula and workshops. Due to the subjective nature of self-assessment, these measures are prone to known biases including framing, recall, social desirability, and response-shift bias. These biases can contribute to floor and ceiling effects of measurement, which can lead to false conclusions about whether the intended learning objectives were achieved. Ideal assessments of skills-based educational activities would include standardized tests and structured observations of learners demonstrating skill use before and after the educational intervention. However, educators often lack the necessary resources, time, and expertise to routinely conduct these appraisals and rely on self-assessment as a pragmatic approach to obtaining curriculum feedback and evaluation data. In this review, we describe three common designs for self-assessments: the pre-post, now-then, and post-only designs. We then give recommendations for choosing between each design to minimize bias. The choice of the best design is based on alignments with four considerations: (1) the educational objectives (e.g., demonstrate skill competency and/or change in skill level); (2) participants' prior experience and shared understanding of levels of skill performance; (3) the nature of the educational activity; and (4) available resources. For each design, we review strengths, weaknesses, and known biases and discuss examples to highlight trade-offs between options. We also discuss the use of control groups and follow-up surveys to measure retention over time as additional methods to address bias and related confounding. The guidance presented here is intended to raise educators' awareness of common pitfalls in self-assessment; minimize the impact of known biases when possible; provide evidence, examples, and rationales for optimal design choices; and increase the rigor of self-assessment evaluations.

摘要

在医学教育中,学习者自我评估是用于评估课程和工作坊效果的标准方法。由于自我评估的主观性,这些措施容易出现包括框架效应、回忆偏差、社会期望偏差和反应转移偏差等已知偏差。这些偏差可能导致测量的地板效应和天花板效应,从而可能得出关于预期学习目标是否达成的错误结论。基于技能的教育活动的理想评估应包括标准化测试以及对学习者在教育干预前后技能运用情况的结构化观察。然而,教育工作者通常缺乏必要的资源、时间和专业知识来常规地进行这些评估,因此依赖自我评估作为获取课程反馈和评估数据的务实方法。在本综述中,我们描述了自我评估的三种常见设计:前后设计、现在与之前对比设计以及仅事后设计。然后,我们给出了在每种设计之间进行选择以尽量减少偏差的建议。最佳设计的选择基于与以下四个因素的契合度:(1)教育目标(例如,展示技能能力和/或技能水平的变化);(2)参与者先前的经验以及对技能表现水平的共同理解;(3)教育活动的性质;(4)可用资源。对于每种设计,我们回顾其优点、缺点和已知偏差,并讨论实例以突出不同选项之间的权衡。我们还讨论了使用对照组和后续调查来测量随时间的保持情况,作为解决偏差和相关混杂因素的额外方法。此处给出的指导旨在提高教育工作者对自我评估中常见陷阱的认识;尽可能减少已知偏差的影响;为最佳设计选择提供证据、示例和理由;并提高自我评估的严谨性。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

4
Changing estimates of leadership ability before a programme: retrospective self-assessments and response-shift bias.
BMJ Lead. 2023 Mar;7(1):64-67. doi: 10.1136/leader-2021-000586. Epub 2022 May 16.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验