Chambert Thierry, Barbraud Christophe, Cam Emmanuelle, Chabrolle Antoine, Sadoul Nicolas, Besnard Aurélien
CEFE, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE-PSL University, IRD, Montpellier, France.
Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé, UMR7372 CNRS-La Rochelle Université, Villiers-en-Bois, France.
Ecology. 2024 Dec;105(12):e4459. doi: 10.1002/ecy.4459. Epub 2024 Nov 4.
Predicting animal population trajectories into the future has become a central exercise in both applied and fundamental ecology. Because demographic models classically assume population closure, they tend to provide inaccurate predictions when applied locally to interconnected subpopulations that are part of a larger metapopulation. Ideally, one should explicitly model dispersal among subpopulations, but in practice this is prevented by the difficulty of estimating dispersal rates in the wild. To forecast the local demography of connected subpopulations, we developed a new demographic model (hereafter, the two-scale model) that disentangles two processes occurring at different spatial scales. First, at the larger scale, a closed population model describes changes in metapopulation size over time. Second, total metapopulation size is redistributed among subpopulations, using time-varying proportionality parameters. This two-step approach ensures that the long-term growth of every subpopulation is constrained by the overall metapopulation growth rate. It implicitly accounts for the interconnectedness among subpopulations and avoids unrealistic trajectories. Using realistic simulations, we compared the performance of this new model with that of a classical closed population model at predicting subpopulations' trajectories over 30 years. While the classical model predicted future subpopulation sizes with an average bias of 30% and produced predictive errors sometimes >500%, the two-scale model showed very little bias (<3%) and never produced predictive errors >20%. We also applied both models to a real dataset on European shags (Gulosus aristotelis) breeding along the Atlantic coast of France. Again, the classical model predicted highly unrealistic growths, as large as a 200-fold increase over 30 years for some subpopulations. The two-scale model predicted very sensible growths, never larger than a threefold increase over the 30-year time horizon, which is more in accordance with this species' life history. This two-scale model provides an effective solution to forecast the local demography of connected subpopulations in the absence of data on dispersal rates. In this context, it is a better alternative than closed population models and a more parsimonious option than full-dispersal models. Because the only data required are simple counts, this model could be useful to many large-scale wildlife monitoring programs.
预测动物种群未来的发展轨迹已成为应用生态学和基础生态学的核心任务。由于传统的种群统计学模型假定种群封闭,因此当将其局部应用于作为更大集合种群一部分的相互连接的亚种群时,往往会给出不准确的预测。理想情况下,应该明确地对亚种群之间的扩散进行建模,但在实际操作中,由于难以估计野生环境中的扩散率,这一点无法实现。为了预测相互连接的亚种群的局部种群统计学特征,我们开发了一种新的种群统计学模型(以下简称双尺度模型),该模型区分了在不同空间尺度上发生的两个过程。首先,在较大尺度上,一个封闭种群模型描述集合种群大小随时间的变化。其次,利用随时间变化的比例参数,将集合种群的总大小重新分配到各个亚种群中。这种两步法确保了每个亚种群的长期增长受到集合种群总体增长率的限制。它隐含地考虑了亚种群之间的相互联系,避免了不切实际的轨迹。通过逼真的模拟,我们将这个新模型与传统的封闭种群模型在预测亚种群30年发展轨迹方面的性能进行了比较。传统模型预测未来亚种群大小的平均偏差为30%,有时产生的预测误差超过500%,而双尺度模型显示出很小的偏差(<3%),且预测误差从未超过20%。我们还将这两个模型应用于一个关于在法国大西洋沿岸繁殖的欧洲鸬鹚(Gulosus aristotelis)的真实数据集。同样,传统模型预测出的增长极不现实,一些亚种群在30年内增长高达200倍。双尺度模型预测的增长较为合理,在30年的时间跨度内从未超过三倍增长,这更符合该物种的生活史。这种双尺度模型为在缺乏扩散率数据的情况下预测相互连接的亚种群的局部种群统计学特征提供了一种有效的解决方案。在这种情况下,它比封闭种群模型更好,比完全扩散模型更简洁。由于所需的唯一数据是简单的计数,该模型可能对许多大规模野生动物监测项目有用。