Taylor Micheal P, Ricciardelli Rosemary, Shively Randy
Ocean and Public Safety Laboratory, Memorial University of Newfoundland's Fisheries and Marine Institute, 155 Ridge Road, St John's, NL, A1C 5R3, Canada.
Alvis, 2100 Stella Court, Columbus, OH, 43215, USA.
Heliyon. 2024 Oct 19;10(20):e39617. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39617. eCollection 2024 Oct 30.
In this article, we draw on qualitative interview data (n = 150) from parole officers (POs) employed in Canada's federal correctional service. Our analysis interprets job satisfaction, accountability, and relational aspects of POs' work, taking a semi-grounded constructivist approach. We discovered correctional workers, such as probation and parole officers, engage in transformational relationships within their workplace environments. However, given economic, social, and political constraints, we question how these change agents actually 'make a difference' in practice. Fidelity to core correctional practices suggests therapeutic alliances are fundamental to intervention. Emergent in our discoveries is how the workplace environment, organizational climate and culture, and penal atmosphere mediate reflexive experiences that inspire motivation, morale, and change. However, our interpretation and situational awareness of parole adds to a lacuna in knowledge about therapeutic relationships in correctional work generally and the responsivity principle specifically for sensemaking about how interventions may sometimes become iatrogenic. We found that POs negotiate their relationships with those under supervision as much as with fellow correctional workers. pertains to consolidation and conceptual clarity concerning how corrections, in its public safety mandate, induces in/efficacy. Through discussion, we theorize how securitized settings affect well-being and provide practical insights to converge on the rehabilitative ideal and criminal desistance.
在本文中,我们借鉴了加拿大联邦惩教服务部门雇佣的假释官(PO)的定性访谈数据(n = 150)。我们的分析采用半扎根建构主义方法,解读了假释官工作中的工作满意度、问责制和人际关系方面。我们发现,诸如缓刑和假释官等惩教工作者在其工作场所环境中建立变革性的关系。然而,鉴于经济、社会和政治限制,我们质疑这些变革推动者在实践中究竟如何“产生影响”。对核心惩教实践的忠诚表明治疗联盟是干预的基础。我们的发现中凸显出工作场所环境、组织氛围和文化以及刑罚氛围如何调节激发动机、士气和变革的反思性体验。然而,我们对假释的解读和情境意识填补了惩教工作中治疗关系知识的空白,特别是对于理解干预有时如何可能产生医源性影响的反应性原则。我们发现,假释官与受监管者以及其他惩教工作者一样,都在协商他们之间的关系。这涉及到在公共安全任务中惩教如何产生内在效力方面的巩固和概念清晰度。通过讨论,我们从理论上探讨了安全化环境如何影响幸福感,并提供了实际见解,以趋向于改造理想和犯罪停止。