BCom, BHsc, BBiomed (Hons), Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic; Department of General Practice, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic.
BSc (Physio), MPH, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic.
Aust J Gen Pract. 2024 Nov;53(11):794-798. doi: 10.31128/AJGP-04-23-6799.
Little is known about the views of service providers currently working in telehealth early medical abortion (EMA) provision in Victoria, Australia. This study aims to contextualise the enablers and barriers to telehealth EMA provision, providing insight for healthcare policy and practice to improve the accessibility of this service.
This was a qualitative descriptive study involving semi-structured interviews with 14 Victorian stakeholders with expertise and knowledge on telehealth EMA provision. Data were analysed using conventional content analysis.
This study presents perceived enablers and barriers across four different contexts of the Victorian abortion system: (1) perceived patient context; (2) perceived provider context; (3) health organisation-system context; and (4) sociopolitical context. The COVID-19 pandemic's disruption of healthcare services led to greater patient and provider acceptance of telehealth EMA. However, barriers within the patient context included the inability to ensure safety and confidentiality, digital access and literacy issues, language barriers, and the importance of trusting provider-patient relationships. Providers encountered challenges in delivering holistic care via telehealth, including time and workload issues and working with interpreters. Shortcomings within the organisational context encompassed structural barriers for culturally and linguistically diverse population groups, the absence of standard telehealth guidelines and varying interpretations of telehealth. Although temporary Medicare item number changes improved access, they presented financial challenges for mixed and private billing practices.
The application of these findings by relevant health services and policymakers has the potential to improve the quality of, and increase accessibility to, telehealth EMA, better meeting the needs of individuals seeking this service.
目前对于澳大利亚维多利亚州从事远程医疗早期药物流产(EMA)服务的服务提供者的观点知之甚少。本研究旨在了解远程医疗 EMA 服务提供的促进因素和障碍,为改善该服务的可及性提供医疗保健政策和实践方面的见解。
这是一项定性描述性研究,涉及对 14 名在远程医疗 EMA 服务提供方面具有专业知识和经验的维多利亚州利益相关者进行半结构化访谈。使用常规内容分析对数据进行分析。
本研究在维多利亚州堕胎系统的四个不同背景下提出了感知到的促进因素和障碍:(1)感知到的患者背景;(2)感知到的提供者背景;(3)卫生组织系统背景;和(4)社会政治背景。COVID-19 大流行对医疗服务的干扰导致患者和提供者对远程医疗 EMA 的接受度更高。然而,患者背景中存在一些障碍,包括无法确保安全和保密性、数字获取和读写能力问题、语言障碍以及信任医患关系的重要性。提供者在通过远程医疗提供全面护理方面遇到了挑战,包括时间和工作量问题以及与口译员合作的问题。组织背景中的不足之处包括针对文化和语言多样化人群的结构性障碍、缺乏标准的远程医疗指南以及对远程医疗的不同解释。尽管临时医疗保险项目编号的更改改善了可及性,但它们给混合和私人计费实践带来了财务挑战。
相关卫生服务和政策制定者应用这些发现有可能提高远程医疗 EMA 的质量并增加其可及性,更好地满足寻求该服务的个人的需求。