Skahill Greta, Shankar Mridula
The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC.
Nossal Institute for Global Health, the University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC.
Med J Aust. 2025 Jul 21;223(2):101-110. doi: 10.5694/mja2.52707. Epub 2025 Jun 18.
To synthesise primary research findings about factors that affect medical abortion provision by general practitioners, nurses, midwives, and pharmacists in Australia.
Mixed methods systematic review of peer-reviewed primary publications of qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods studies of the provision of medical abortion in Australian primary care, 1 January 2013 - 18 January 2025.
MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature).
Twenty-three publications satisfied our inclusion criteria. We undertook a thematic synthesis of the qualitative study findings to identify barriers and facilitators of medical abortion provision, and assessed the confidence of each review finding using the GRADE-CERQual approach; we also compared the qualitative synthesis with quantitative study findings. We developed ten review findings grouped under three themes: moral, legal, and regulatory influences on abortion care (three review findings; very low to moderate confidence); the absence of a systems-based approach to abortion provision (six review findings; moderate to high confidence); and early medical abortion belongs in primary care (one review finding; high confidence). Barriers to providing medical abortion include the absence of a supportive service delivery strategy, insufficient Medicare remuneration, geographic isolation, limited access to training, and colleagues who conscientiously object to abortion. Facilitators of its provision include clinician support networks and personal motivation to improve access to reproductive health care.
A range of individual, service level, and system factors exacerbate the effects of geographic location and financial considerations on the provision of medical abortion in Australian primary care. Our findings indicate that financial and structural support is needed for the geographic decentralisation of medical abortion training and services, the establishment of nurse-led models of care, and the integration of abortion care into primary care.
综合关于影响澳大利亚全科医生、护士、助产士和药剂师提供药物流产因素的主要研究结果。
对2013年1月1日至2025年1月18日期间澳大利亚初级保健中提供药物流产的定性、定量和混合方法研究的同行评审主要出版物进行混合方法系统评价。
MEDLINE、Scopus、科学网、CINAHL(护理及相关健康文献累积索引)。
23篇出版物符合我们的纳入标准。我们对定性研究结果进行了主题综合,以确定提供药物流产的障碍和促进因素,并使用GRADE-CERQual方法评估每个综述结果的可信度;我们还将定性综合结果与定量研究结果进行了比较。我们得出了十个综述结果,分为三个主题:堕胎护理的道德、法律和监管影响(三个综述结果;可信度极低到中等);缺乏基于系统的堕胎提供方法(六个综述结果;可信度中等至高);早期药物流产属于初级保健范畴(一个综述结果;可信度高)。提供药物流产的障碍包括缺乏支持性的服务提供策略、医疗保险报销不足、地理位置偏远、培训机会有限以及有出于良心拒绝对堕胎的同事。其提供的促进因素包括临床医生支持网络和改善生殖健康护理可及性的个人动机。
一系列个人、服务层面和系统因素加剧了地理位置和经济因素对澳大利亚初级保健中药物流产提供的影响。我们的研究结果表明,药物流产培训和服务的地理分散化、建立以护士为主导的护理模式以及将堕胎护理纳入初级保健需要财政和结构支持。