• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对新西兰新冠病毒蓝牙暴露通知框架的人群接受度和接触者追踪器使用情况的评估。

An evaluation of the population uptake and contact tracer utilisation of the Covid-19 Bluetooth Exposure Notification Framework in New Zealand.

作者信息

Chambers Tim, Anglemyer Andrew, Chen Andrew, Atkinson June, Elers Phoebe, Baker Michael G

机构信息

Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.

Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

出版信息

Aust N Z J Public Health. 2024 Dec;48(6):100197. doi: 10.1016/j.anzjph.2024.100197. Epub 2024 Nov 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.anzjph.2024.100197
PMID:39500072
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Our primary research objective was to assess the population uptake and contact tracer utilisation of the Bluetooth function of the New Zealand Covid Tracer App (NZCTA) throughout the pandemic.

METHODS

We adopted a retrospective cohort study design using all diagnosed COVID-19 community cases from December 12, 2020 to February 16, 2022.

RESULTS

At its height, more than 60% of the eligible population had the Bluetooth function of NZCTA activated. However, only an estimated 2.2% of the population was able to fully participate. Cases managed by the national case investigation service were 17 times (aRR 17.54, 95%CI: 13.02-23.90) and 9 times (aRR 9.27, 95%CI: 6.91, 12.76) more likely to generate a Bluetooth token than cases managed by local public health units during the Delta and Omicron periods, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The Bluetooth functionality of the NZCTA likely had a low impact on the pandemic response in NZ despite its exceptionally high levels of public uptake. The primary reason for the lack of impact was the low utilisation by contact tracers.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH

The results highlight the need for greater consultation and collaboration with the public health sector during the development and implementation of digital contact tracing tools.

摘要

目的

我们的主要研究目标是评估在整个疫情期间,新西兰新冠追踪应用程序(NZCTA)蓝牙功能在人群中的使用情况以及接触者追踪人员对该功能的利用情况。

方法

我们采用回顾性队列研究设计,研究对象为2020年12月12日至2022年2月16日期间所有确诊的新冠社区病例。

结果

在其使用高峰期,超过60%的符合条件人群激活了NZCTA的蓝牙功能。然而,估计只有2.2%的人群能够充分参与。在德尔塔和奥密克戎时期,由国家病例调查服务机构管理的病例分别比由地方公共卫生单位管理的病例生成蓝牙令牌的可能性高17倍(调整后风险比17.54,95%置信区间:13.02 - 23.90)和9倍(调整后风险比9.27,95%置信区间:6.91,12.76)。

结论

尽管NZCTA的蓝牙功能在公众中的使用率极高,但它对新西兰疫情应对的影响可能较低。缺乏影响的主要原因是接触者追踪人员的利用率较低。

对公共卫生的启示

研究结果凸显了在数字接触者追踪工具的开发和实施过程中,需要与公共卫生部门进行更多协商与合作。

相似文献

1
An evaluation of the population uptake and contact tracer utilisation of the Covid-19 Bluetooth Exposure Notification Framework in New Zealand.对新西兰新冠病毒蓝牙暴露通知框架的人群接受度和接触者追踪器使用情况的评估。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2024 Dec;48(6):100197. doi: 10.1016/j.anzjph.2024.100197. Epub 2024 Nov 5.
2
Population and contact tracer uptake of New Zealand's QR-code-based digital contact tracing app for COVID-19.新西兰基于 QR 码的 COVID-19 数字接触者追踪应用程序的人口和接触者追踪参与情况。
Epidemiol Infect. 2024 Apr 17;152:e66. doi: 10.1017/S0950268824000608.
3
An evaluation of the COVID-19 self-service digital contact tracing system in New Zealand.新西兰对 COVID-19 自助式数字接触者追踪系统的评估。
Health Policy. 2024 Jun;144:105073. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105073. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
4
'Barely keeping the wheels on the trolley': A qualitative study of the New Zealand COVID Tracer App.“勉强维持追踪器的运转”:新西兰 COVID Tracer App 的定性研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2024 Sep;356:117147. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117147. Epub 2024 Jul 20.
5
Performance of the Swiss Digital Contact-Tracing App Over Various SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic Waves: Repeated Cross-sectional Analyses.瑞士数字化接触者追踪应用在不同 SARS-CoV-2 大流行波次中的表现:重复横断面分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 Nov 11;8(11):e41004. doi: 10.2196/41004.
6
The Influence of Normative Perceptions on the Uptake of the COVID-19 TraceTogether Digital Contact Tracing System: Cross-sectional Study.规范性认知对 COVID-19 TraceTogether 数字接触者追踪系统采用的影响:横断面研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Nov 12;7(11):e30462. doi: 10.2196/30462.
7
The more the merrier! Barriers and facilitators to the general public's use of a COVID-19 contact tracing app in New Zealand.越多越好!新西兰公众使用 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序的障碍和促进因素。
Inform Health Soc Care. 2022 Apr 3;47(2):132-143. doi: 10.1080/17538157.2021.1951274. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
8
The Roles of General Health and COVID-19 Proximity in Contact Tracing App Usage: Cross-sectional Survey Study.一般健康状况和与 COVID-19 的接近程度在接触者追踪应用程序使用中的作用:横断面调查研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Aug 18;7(8):e27892. doi: 10.2196/27892.
9
Adaptation and Utilization of a Postmarket Evaluation Model for Digital Contact Tracing Mobile Health Tools in the United States: Observational Cross-sectional Study.美国数字接触者追踪移动健康工具的上市后评估模型的调整和利用:观察性横断面研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Mar 22;9:e38633. doi: 10.2196/38633.
10
Factors Associated With Using the COVID-19 Mobile Contact-Tracing App Among Individuals Diagnosed With SARS-CoV-2 in Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Observational Study.与在荷兰阿姆斯特丹被诊断患有 SARS-CoV-2 的个体使用 COVID-19 移动接触者追踪应用程序相关的因素:观察性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Aug 24;10(8):e31099. doi: 10.2196/31099.

引用本文的文献

1
Preparing for the next pandemic: insights from Aotearoa New Zealand's Covid-19 response.为下一次大流行做准备:来自新西兰应对新冠疫情的见解。
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2025 Mar 18;56:101525. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2025.101525. eCollection 2025 Mar.