Laue Philipp, Strauß Bernhard
Institut für Psychosoziale Medizin, Psychotherapie und Psychoonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Jena.
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2025 Jan;75(1):9-19. doi: 10.1055/a-2422-0496. Epub 2024 Nov 5.
Organiszed abuse (OA) is a form of long-lasting, mostly sexualized violence against children, youth, or women by networked perpetrators for financial and power-related enrichment. Individual reports and historical analyses imply this violence could have taken place in the German Democratic Republic (GDR). This study is the first to shed light on OA in the GDR from the perspective of those affected.
N=10 confidential hearings and written reports of victims of sexualized violence in childhood and adolescence in the GDR, which were made available by the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse in Germany, were analyzed using content-structuring qualitative content analysis.
OA was described with multiple forms of sexualized, physical and psychological violence. Those affected place OA in different contexts, with other categories (perpetrators, duration/frequency of violence, motives) sometimes dependent on these. The consequences for victims are both short- and long-term in nature and occur on both health (especially psychopathological) and psychosocial levels up to the present. There were no indications of further GDR-specific characteristics of OA.
The reports of victims enable the perspective of "experienced knowledge", which has its limit where descriptions presuppose the knowledge of perpetrators (e. g., motives for violence, characteristics of violence structure). Possible political-ideological features of violence could not be discussed due to considering OA as an "ideology-free" phenomenon (in contrast to e. g. ritual abuse). In addition to definitional distinctions between different phenomena of violence, a multiperspective and multiprofessional approach is necessary to guarantee a historically sensitive continuation of research.
有组织虐待(OA)是一种由有组织的犯罪者针对儿童、青少年或妇女实施的长期暴力行为,主要涉及性方面,目的是获取经济利益和权力。个别报告和历史分析表明,这种暴力行为可能在德意志民主共和国(东德)发生过。本研究首次从受害者的角度揭示了东德的有组织虐待情况。
对德国儿童性虐待独立调查提供的10份东德儿童期和青春期性暴力受害者的保密听证会记录和书面报告,采用内容结构化定性内容分析法进行分析。
有组织虐待表现为多种形式的性暴力、身体暴力和心理暴力。受害者将有组织虐待置于不同背景下,其他类别(犯罪者、暴力持续时间/频率、动机)有时取决于这些背景。对受害者的影响既有短期的,也有长期的,在健康(尤其是精神病理学方面)和心理社会层面一直持续到现在。没有迹象表明有组织虐待具有东德特有的其他特征。
受害者的报告提供了“经验性知识”的视角,但在描述预设犯罪者知识(如暴力动机、暴力结构特征)的情况下,这种视角存在局限性。由于将有组织虐待视为一种“无意识形态”的现象(与例如仪式性虐待形成对比),无法讨论暴力可能具有的政治意识形态特征。除了区分不同暴力现象的定义外,还需要采取多视角和多专业的方法,以确保研究在历史敏感性方面得以延续。