Suppr超能文献

成功减肥维持者的步行经济性和运动效率。

Walking economy and exercise efficiency in successful weight loss maintainers.

机构信息

Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism, and Diabetes, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA; Anschutz Health & Wellness Center at the University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.

Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism, and Diabetes, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.

出版信息

Physiol Behav. 2025 Jan 1;288:114730. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2024.114730. Epub 2024 Nov 4.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Following short-term weight loss, the energetic cost of transport decreases and exercise efficiency increases. Whether changes persist during long-term weight maintenance is unknown.

METHODS

We compared walking economy and exercise efficiency in weight loss maintainers (WLM, maintaining ≥13.6 kg weight loss for ≥1 year), controls without obesity (NC, BMI similar to current BMI of WLM), and controls with overweight/obesity (OC, BMI similar to pre-weight loss BMI of WLM). Energy expenditure (EE) and respiratory quotient were measured using indirect calorimetry at rest, while standing, and during treadmill walking. Gross and net energetic cost of transport (J/kg/m) was measured during level treadmill walking at 0.75, 1.12, and 1.52 m/s. Gross, net, and delta efficiency (%) were measured during inclined treadmill walking (2 %, 4 %, and 6 % grade) and a constant speed (1.12 m/s).

RESULTS

WLM (n = 32, BMI: 23.8 ± 2.3 kg/m) and NC (n = 28, BMI: 22.7 ± 1.6 kg/m) had significantly lower EE (kJ/min) compared to OC (n = 26, BMI: 33.0 ± 4.5 kg/m) during rest, standing, and walking (p < 0.01). Net energetic cost of transport was significantly lower in WLM compared to OC at 1.12 and 1.52 m/s (p < 0.05). Net efficiency was significantly greater in WLM compared to OC while walking (p ≤ 0.05). There were no significant differences between WLM and NC for any measures of economy or efficiency.

CONCLUSION

WLM had lower walking economy and greater walking efficiency compared to OC, but there were no differences between WLM and NC. Thus, individuals maintaining significant weight loss may be successful with long-term weight loss, in part, due to resistance against adaptive reductions in walking energetics.

摘要

目的

短期体重减轻后,运动的能量消耗减少,运动效率提高。在长期保持体重期间,这些变化是否持续尚不清楚。

方法

我们比较了体重维持者(WLM,维持体重减轻≥13.6kg 超过 1 年)、无肥胖对照组(NC,BMI 与 WLM 当前 BMI 相似)和超重/肥胖对照组(OC,BMI 与 WLM 减肥前 BMI 相似)在减肥后保持者的步行经济性和运动效率。使用间接测热法在休息、站立和跑步机步行时测量能量消耗(EE)和呼吸商。在水平跑步机上以 0.75、1.12 和 1.52m/s 的速度测量总能量和净能量运输成本(J/kg/m)。在倾斜跑步机上(2%、4%和 6%坡度)和恒定速度(1.12m/s)下测量总效率、净效率和效率变化(%)。

结果

WLM(n=32,BMI:23.8±2.3kg/m)和 NC(n=28,BMI:22.7±1.6kg/m)的 EE(kJ/min)在休息、站立和步行时明显低于 OC(n=26,BMI:33.0±4.5kg/m)(p<0.01)。在 1.12 和 1.52m/s 时,WLM 的净能量运输成本明显低于 OC(p<0.05)。与 OC 相比,WLM 在步行时的净效率显著更高(p≤0.05)。WLM 与 NC 在任何经济性或效率指标方面均无差异。

结论

与 OC 相比,WLM 的步行经济性较低,步行效率较高,但与 NC 无差异。因此,长期保持体重减轻的个体可能成功地长期保持体重减轻,部分原因是抵抗步行能量学的适应性降低。

相似文献

1
Walking economy and exercise efficiency in successful weight loss maintainers.成功减肥维持者的步行经济性和运动效率。
Physiol Behav. 2025 Jan 1;288:114730. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2024.114730. Epub 2024 Nov 4.
3
Interventions for preventing weight gain after smoking cessation.戒烟后预防体重增加的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jan 18;1:CD006219. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006219.pub3.
7
Energy Expenditure and Cost During Walking After Stroke: A Systematic Review.中风后步行时的能量消耗与成本:一项系统综述。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Apr;97(4):619-632.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.11.007. Epub 2015 Dec 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Temporal patterns of physical activity in successful weight loss maintainers.成功减肥维持者的体力活动时间模式。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2021 Sep;45(9):2074-2082. doi: 10.1038/s41366-021-00877-4. Epub 2021 Jun 14.
8

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验