• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Artificial intelligence generates proficient Spanish obstetrics and gynecology counseling templates.人工智能生成了专业的西班牙语妇产科咨询模板。
AJOG Glob Rep. 2024 Sep 19;4(4):100400. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100400. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Evidence-based potential of generative artificial intelligence large language models in orthodontics: a comparative study of ChatGPT, Google Bard, and Microsoft Bing.生成式人工智能大语言模型在正畸学中的循证潜力:ChatGPT、谷歌巴德和微软必应的比较研究
Eur J Orthod. 2024 Apr 13. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjae017.
3
Evaluation of the Performance of Generative AI Large Language Models ChatGPT, Google Bard, and Microsoft Bing Chat in Supporting Evidence-Based Dentistry: Comparative Mixed Methods Study.评估生成式 AI 大语言模型 ChatGPT、Google Bard 和 Microsoft Bing Chat 在支持循证牙科方面的性能:比较混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Dec 28;25:e51580. doi: 10.2196/51580.
4
Performance of Large Language Models (ChatGPT, Bing Search, and Google Bard) in Solving Case Vignettes in Physiology.大语言模型(ChatGPT、必应搜索和谷歌巴德)在解决生理学病例 vignettes 中的表现。
Cureus. 2023 Aug 4;15(8):e42972. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42972. eCollection 2023 Aug.
5
Harnessing artificial intelligence in bariatric surgery: comparative analysis of ChatGPT-4, Bing, and Bard in generating clinician-level bariatric surgery recommendations.利用人工智能在减重手术中的应用:ChatGPT-4、Bing 和 Bard 在生成临床医生水平的减重手术建议方面的比较分析。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2024 Jul;20(7):603-608. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2024.03.011. Epub 2024 Mar 24.
6
Comparison of artificial intelligence large language model chatbots in answering frequently asked questions in anaesthesia.人工智能大语言模型聊天机器人在回答麻醉常见问题方面的比较。
BJA Open. 2024 May 8;10:100280. doi: 10.1016/j.bjao.2024.100280. eCollection 2024 Jun.
7
Pilot Testing of a Tool to Standardize the Assessment of the Quality of Health Information Generated by Artificial Intelligence-Based Models.用于规范基于人工智能模型生成的健康信息质量评估工具的试点测试。
Cureus. 2023 Nov 24;15(11):e49373. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49373. eCollection 2023 Nov.
8
Accuracy and Readability of Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Responses to Vasectomy-Related Questions: Public Beware.人工智能聊天机器人对输精管切除术相关问题回答的准确性和可读性:公众需谨慎。
Cureus. 2024 Aug 28;16(8):e67996. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67996. eCollection 2024 Aug.
9
Assessing the Accuracy of Information on Medication Abortion: A Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT and Google Bard AI.评估药物流产信息的准确性:ChatGPT与谷歌巴德人工智能的比较分析
Cureus. 2024 Jan 2;16(1):e51544. doi: 10.7759/cureus.51544. eCollection 2024 Jan.
10
Large Language Models in Hematology Case Solving: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT-3.5, Google Bard, and Microsoft Bing.大语言模型在血液学病例解决中的应用:ChatGPT-3.5、谷歌巴德和微软必应的比较研究
Cureus. 2023 Aug 21;15(8):e43861. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43861. eCollection 2023 Aug.

引用本文的文献

1
The PERFORM Study: Artificial Intelligence Versus Human Residents in Cross-Sectional Obstetrics-Gynecology Scenarios Across Languages and Time Constraints.PERFORM研究:跨语言和时间限制的妇产科横断面场景中人工智能与住院医师的比较
Mayo Clin Proc Digit Health. 2025 Mar 8;3(2):100206. doi: 10.1016/j.mcpdig.2025.100206. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Large language models and women's health: a digital companion for informed decision-making.大语言模型与女性健康:助力明智决策的数字伴侣。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 Jun 21. doi: 10.1007/s00404-025-08065-9.
3
Physician awareness of, interest in, and current use of artificial intelligence large language model-based virtual assistants.医生对基于人工智能大语言模型的虚拟助手的认知、兴趣及当前使用情况。
PLoS One. 2025 May 28;20(5):e0320749. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320749. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Harnessing ChatGPT and GPT-4 for evaluating the rheumatology questions of the Spanish access exam to specialized medical training.利用 ChatGPT 和 GPT-4 评估西班牙专科医学培训准入考试的风湿病学问题。
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 13;13(1):22129. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-49483-6.
2
Performance of Large Language Models on a Neurology Board-Style Examination.大语言模型在神经科 board-style 考试中的表现。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Dec 1;6(12):e2346721. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.46721.
3
Evaluating the Efficacy of ChatGPT in Navigating the Spanish Medical Residency Entrance Examination (MIR): Promising Horizons for AI in Clinical Medicine.评估ChatGPT在应对西班牙医学住院医师入学考试(MIR)中的效果:人工智能在临床医学中的广阔前景。
Clin Pract. 2023 Nov 20;13(6):1460-1487. doi: 10.3390/clinpract13060130.
4
The future landscape of large language models in medicine.医学领域大语言模型的未来前景。
Commun Med (Lond). 2023 Oct 10;3(1):141. doi: 10.1038/s43856-023-00370-1.
5
Large Language Model-Based Chatbot vs Surgeon-Generated Informed Consent Documentation for Common Procedures.基于大语言模型的聊天机器人与外科医生生成的常见手术知情同意书文档。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Oct 2;6(10):e2336997. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.36997.
6
Accuracy and Reliability of Chatbot Responses to Physician Questions.聊天机器人对医生提问回答的准确性和可靠性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Oct 2;6(10):e2336483. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.36483.
7
Comparison of Ophthalmologist and Large Language Model Chatbot Responses to Online Patient Eye Care Questions.眼科医生与大型语言模型聊天机器人对在线患者眼部护理问题的回复比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2330320. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.30320.
8
AI in Medicine-JAMA's Focus on Clinical Outcomes, Patient-Centered Care, Quality, and Equity.医学中的人工智能——《美国医学会杂志》对临床结果、以患者为中心的护理、质量和公平性的关注。
JAMA. 2023 Sep 5;330(9):818-820. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.15481.
9
ChatGPT performance in the medical specialty exam: An observational study.ChatGPT 在医学专业考试中的表现:一项观察性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Aug 11;102(32):e34673. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034673.
10
Sailing the Seven Seas: A Multinational Comparison of ChatGPT's Performance on Medical Licensing Examinations.航海七海:ChatGPT 在医学执照考试中的表现的跨国比较。
Ann Biomed Eng. 2024 Jun;52(6):1542-1545. doi: 10.1007/s10439-023-03338-3. Epub 2023 Aug 8.

人工智能生成了专业的西班牙语妇产科咨询模板。

Artificial intelligence generates proficient Spanish obstetrics and gynecology counseling templates.

作者信息

Solmonovich Rachel L, Kouba Insaf, Quezada Oscar, Rodriguez-Ayala Gianni, Rojas Veronica, Bonilla Kevin, Espino Kevin, Bracero Luis A

机构信息

Northwell, New Hyde Park, NY (Solmonovich, Kouba, Quezada, Rodriguez-Ayala, Rojas, Bonilla, Espino, and Bracero).

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, South Shore University Hospital, Bay Shore, NY (Solmonovich, Kouba, Rojas, Bonilla, Espino, and Bracero).

出版信息

AJOG Glob Rep. 2024 Sep 19;4(4):100400. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100400. eCollection 2024 Nov.

DOI:10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100400
PMID:39507462
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11539139/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Effective patient counseling in Obstetrics and gynecology is vital. Existing language barriers between Spanish-speaking patients and English-speaking providers may negatively impact patient understanding and adherence to medical recommendations, as language discordance between provider and patient has been associated with medication noncompliance, adverse drug events, and underuse of preventative care. Artificial intelligence large language models may be a helpful adjunct to patient care by generating counseling templates in Spanish.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective was to determine if large language models can generate proficient counseling templates in Spanish on obstetric and gynecology topics. Secondary objectives were to (1) compare the content, quality, and comprehensiveness of generated templates between different large language models, (2) compare the proficiency ratings among the large language model generated templates, and (3) assess which generated templates had potential for integration into clinical practice.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study using free open-access large language models to generate counseling templates in Spanish on select obstetrics and gynecology topics. Native Spanish-speaking practicing obstetricians and gynecologists, who were blinded to the source large language model for each template, reviewed and subjectively scored each template on its content, quality, and comprehensiveness and considered it for integration into clinical practice. Proficiency ratings were calculated as a composite score of content, quality, and comprehensiveness. A score of >4 was considered proficient. Basic inferential statistics were performed.

RESULTS

All artificial intelligence large language models generated proficient obstetrics and gynecology counseling templates in Spanish, with Google Bard generating the most proficient template (p<0.0001) and outperforming the others in comprehensiveness (=.03), quality (=.04), and content (=.01). Microsoft Bing received the lowest scores in these domains. Physicians were likely to be willing to incorporate the templates into clinical practice, with no significant discrepancy in the likelihood of integration based on the source large language model (=.45).

CONCLUSIONS

Large language models have potential to generate proficient obstetrics and gynecology counseling templates in Spanish, which physicians would integrate into their clinical practice. Google Bard scored the highest across all attributes. There is an opportunity to use large language models to try to mitigate the language barriers in health care. Future studies should assess patient satisfaction, understanding, and adherence to clinical plans following receipt of these counseling templates.

摘要

背景

妇产科有效的患者咨询至关重要。说西班牙语的患者与说英语的医护人员之间存在的语言障碍可能会对患者对医疗建议的理解和依从性产生负面影响,因为医护人员与患者之间的语言不一致与用药不依从、药物不良事件以及预防保健利用不足有关。人工智能大语言模型通过生成西班牙语的咨询模板可能会成为患者护理的有益辅助工具。

目的

主要目的是确定大语言模型是否能够生成关于妇产科主题的熟练的西班牙语咨询模板。次要目的是:(1)比较不同大语言模型生成的模板在内容、质量和全面性方面的差异;(2)比较大语言模型生成的模板之间的熟练程度评分;(3)评估哪些生成的模板具有整合到临床实践中的潜力。

研究设计

横断面研究,使用免费的开放获取大语言模型生成关于选定妇产科主题的西班牙语咨询模板。以西班牙语为母语的执业妇产科医生对每个模板的源大语言模型不知情,对每个模板的内容、质量和全面性进行审查并主观评分,并考虑将其整合到临床实践中。熟练程度评分计算为内容、质量和全面性的综合得分。得分>4被认为是熟练的。进行了基本的推断统计。

结果

所有人工智能大语言模型都生成了熟练的西班牙语妇产科咨询模板。谷歌巴德生成的模板最熟练(p<0.0001),在全面性(=0.03)、质量(=0.04)和内容(=0.01)方面优于其他模型。微软必应在这些领域得分最低。医生可能愿意将这些模板整合到临床实践中,基于源大语言模型的整合可能性没有显著差异(=0.45)。

结论

大语言模型有潜力生成熟练的西班牙语妇产科咨询模板,医生会将其整合到临床实践中。谷歌巴德在所有属性上得分最高。有机会利用大语言模型来试图减轻医疗保健中的语言障碍。未来的研究应评估患者在收到这些咨询模板后对临床计划的满意度、理解度和依从性。