• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

青年专业人士参与卫生政策制定的机制:文化领域方法。

Mechanisms of young professional engagement in health policy development: a cultural domain approach.

机构信息

Department of Health Services Research, Management, and Policy, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2024 Oct 23;12:1389649. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1389649. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1389649
PMID:39507656
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11537898/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Engagement in public health policy development is critical to forward-thinking public health policy. There is a robust empirical case to support the prospect of the engagement of young adults in civic and research efforts. However, the literature is limited in conceptualizing the mechanisms of engagement in health policy development from the perspective of young adults. This study applied the concepts and methods of cognitive anthropology to identify the mechanisms of engagement in health policy development from the perspective of young people.

METHODS

Online elicitation and cognitive domain analysis were applied to collect and analyze the data. Students enrolled in a public health leadership class at a large United States southeastern university were invited to participate in an online discussion. Saturation was achieved after the eighth submission. Data were analyzed qualitatively for repetition and recurrence and quantitatively to assess their cultural saliency.

RESULTS

Thirty-two students submitted 147 individual engagement ideas. The analysis resulted in 24 unique mechanisms organized into 10 clusters. The most prominent engagement mechanisms included education, peer activities, advocacy, direct involvement, and activism.

DISCUSSION

In the dynamic landscape of public health, active involvement in health policy development presents a crucial pathway for leadership among young professionals. The application of cognitive anthropology methods contributes to the emerging science of engagement and allows to identify and measure consensus around the pathways for engagement in health policy development among young professionals.

摘要

简介

参与公共卫生政策制定对于前瞻性的公共卫生政策至关重要。有大量的经验证据支持年轻人参与公民和研究工作的前景。然而,从年轻人的角度来概念化参与健康政策制定的机制的文献有限。本研究应用认知人类学的概念和方法,从年轻人的角度确定参与健康政策制定的机制。

方法

在线启发和认知领域分析被应用于收集和分析数据。邀请在美国东南部一所大型大学修读公共卫生领导力课程的学生参加在线讨论。在第八次提交后达到了饱和。对重复和重现的数据进行了定性分析,并对其文化显著性进行了定量评估。

结果

32 名学生提交了 147 条个人参与想法。分析结果得出了 24 个独特的机制,分为 10 个集群。最突出的参与机制包括教育、同伴活动、宣传、直接参与和激进主义。

讨论

在公共卫生的动态环境中,积极参与健康政策制定为年轻专业人员的领导力提供了一个关键途径。认知人类学方法的应用有助于参与科学的发展,并能够确定和衡量年轻人参与健康政策制定的途径的共识。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/368a/11537898/cf0cf443f2c0/fpubh-12-1389649-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/368a/11537898/cf0cf443f2c0/fpubh-12-1389649-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/368a/11537898/cf0cf443f2c0/fpubh-12-1389649-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Mechanisms of young professional engagement in health policy development: a cultural domain approach.青年专业人士参与卫生政策制定的机制:文化领域方法。
Front Public Health. 2024 Oct 23;12:1389649. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1389649. eCollection 2024.
2
Interfaith Leadership as a Civic Priority: Higher Education's Role in Developing Bridge-Builders.跨信仰领导力作为公民优先事项:高等教育在培养桥梁建设者方面的作用。
New Dir Stud Leadersh. 2020 Jun;2020(166):83-96. doi: 10.1002/yd.20384.
3
Creating academic structures to promote nursing's role in global health policy.创建学术架构以促进护理在全球卫生政策中的作用。
Int Nurs Rev. 2017 Mar;64(1):117-125. doi: 10.1111/inr.12338. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
4
Public Engagement in Health Policy-Making for Older Adults: A Systematic Search and Scoping Review.公众参与老年人健康政策制定:系统检索和范围综述。
Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e70008. doi: 10.1111/hex.70008.
5
[The health policy of the Paul Verlaine University-Metz].[梅斯保罗·魏尔伦大学的卫生政策]
Sante Publique. 2010 Mar-Apr;22(2):239-48.
6
How can the University of Hawai'i meet needs for public health education? Results of a students' needs assessment.夏威夷大学如何满足公共卫生教育需求?一项学生需求评估的结果。
Pac Health Dialog. 2007 Mar;14(1):191-8.
7
A contemporary view of civic leadership: Understanding college student perspectives and addressing barriers of service and engagement.当代公民领导力视角:理解大学生的观点并解决服务和参与的障碍。
New Dir Stud Leadersh. 2024 Jun;2024(182):81-91. doi: 10.1002/yd.20604. Epub 2024 May 14.
8
Using Deliberative Pedagogy as a Tool for Critical Thinking and Career Preparation Among Undergraduate Public Health Students.将协商式教学法作为本科公共卫生专业学生批判性思维和职业准备的工具
Front Public Health. 2019 Mar 4;7:37. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00037. eCollection 2019.
9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10
Promotion of Civic Engagement with the Family Leadership Training Institute.家庭领导力培训学院促进公民参与。
Am J Community Psychol. 2017 Dec;60(3-4):568-583. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12205. Epub 2017 Nov 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing evaluation metrics to measure the US national institute of health plans to enhance diverse perspectives: a protocol for a consensus-based study.制定评估指标以衡量美国国立卫生研究院增强多元观点的计划:一项基于共识的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 26;15(2):e087739. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087739.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating the effect of a 12-month youth advisory group on adolescent's leadership skills and perceptions related to chronic disease prevention research: a mixed-methods study.评估为期 12 个月的青年顾问小组对青少年领导力技能和对慢性病预防研究相关认知的影响:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Nov 27;23(1):2344. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17283-2.
2
Engaging Early-Career Scientists in Global Policy-Making.让早期职业科学家参与全球决策。
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2023 Aug 21;62(34):e202217841. doi: 10.1002/anie.202217841. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
3
Youth engagement in research and policy: The CO-CREATE framework to optimize power balance and mitigate risks of conflicts of interest.
青年参与研究与政策制定:优化权力平衡及降低利益冲突风险的共同创造框架
Obes Rev. 2023 Feb;24 Suppl 1:e13549. doi: 10.1111/obr.13549. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
4
How are groups of early career pharmacists and pharmaceutical scientists contributing to global health and policy development: A cross-sectional survey.早期职业药剂师和药物科学家群体如何为全球健康和政策制定做出贡献:一项横断面调查。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2023 Apr;19(4):615-621. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2022.11.012. Epub 2022 Dec 6.
5
Policy Engagement Framework for Public Health: A Tool to Enhance Maternal and Child Health Workforce Capacity.公共卫生政策参与框架:增强母婴保健劳动力能力的工具。
Matern Child Health J. 2023 Jan;27(1):1-6. doi: 10.1007/s10995-022-03562-8. Epub 2022 Nov 22.
6
Ethics framework for citizen science and public and patient participation in research.公民科学和公众及患者参与研究的伦理框架。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Mar 13;23(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00761-4.
7
Adolescent Participation in Research, Policies and Guidelines for Chronic Disease Prevention: A Scoping Review Protocol.青少年参与慢性病预防研究的政策和指南:范围综述方案。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 9;17(21):8257. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17218257.
8
Stakeholders' experiences of the public health research process: time to change the system?利益相关者对公共卫生研究过程的体验:是时候改变系统了?
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Jul 18;18(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00599-5.
9
Research co-design in health: a rapid overview of reviews.健康领域的研究共同设计:综述快速概览。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Feb 11;18(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-0528-9.
10
Using paired cultural modelling and cultural consensus analysis to maximize programme suitability in local contexts.运用配对文化建模和文化共识分析,使方案在当地环境下具有最大适用性。
Health Policy Plan. 2020 Feb 1;35(1):115-121. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czz096.