Khoo Aaron K, Huynh Annie, Pelecanos Anita, Eley Victoria A
School of Medicine Western Sydney University Sydney New South Wales Australia.
Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine Nepean Hospital Sydney New South Wales Australia.
Health Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 6;7(11):e70039. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70039. eCollection 2024 Nov.
Preprocedural ultrasound (PPU) reduces the risk of technical failure in non-obese patients and when technical difficulty is predicted. We conducted this review to determine if PPU improves first-pass needle insertion success for neuraxial anesthesia in patients with obesity.
We conducted a systematic review without meta-analysis, due to the small number of included studies. The study protocol was registered (PROSPERO: CRD42022368271). We conducted searches in MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library from January 1, 1980 to October 1, 2022 for peer-reviewed randomized controlled or observational studies comparing PPU versus landmark techniques in patients with body mass index >30 kg/m. The quality of evidence was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.
There were nine randomized controlled studies, comprising 866 patients having lumbo-sacral neuraxial techniques. Three studies utilized a small handheld ultrasound device called Accuro™ and six utilized non-handheld ultrasound devices. Certainty of evidence was low for improving the first-pass success rate. There was evidence (moderate certainty) that PPU decreased number of passes, increased first insertion attempt success, and reduced number of insertion attempts. There was no evidence that PPU affected identifying time, needling time, or overall procedural time. There was no evidence that PPU influenced procedural failure rate (very low certainty evidence) and insufficient evidence to suggest that artificial intelligence-supported handheld devices were superior to conventional ultrasound devices.
In patients with obesity, there is evidence of very-low to moderate certainty that PPU improves markers of insertion success, with no indication of increased adverse effects. PPU should be used to reduce attempts. Further studies adhering to standardized outcome definitions are required for definitive recommendations.
The study protocol was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO: CRD42022368271).
术前超声(PPU)可降低非肥胖患者以及预计存在技术困难时的技术失败风险。我们进行这项综述以确定PPU是否能提高肥胖患者神经轴索麻醉首次穿刺针插入成功率。
由于纳入研究数量较少,我们进行了一项无荟萃分析的系统综述。研究方案已注册(国际系统评价前瞻性注册库:CRD42022368271)。我们在1980年1月1日至2022年10月1日期间在MEDLINE、Embase、PubMed和Cochrane图书馆中检索了经同行评审的随机对照或观察性研究,比较体重指数>30kg/m²的患者中PPU与体表标志技术。使用修订后的Cochrane随机试验偏倚风险工具和推荐分级评估、制定与评价方法评估证据质量。
有9项随机对照研究,共866例患者接受腰骶部神经轴索技术操作。3项研究使用了一种名为Accuro™的小型手持式超声设备,6项研究使用了非手持式超声设备。提高首次穿刺成功率方面证据确定性低。有证据表明(中等确定性)PPU减少了穿刺次数,提高了首次穿刺尝试成功率,并减少了穿刺尝试次数。没有证据表明PPU会影响识别时间、进针时间或总操作时间。没有证据表明PPU会影响操作失败率(极低确定性证据),也没有足够证据表明人工智能支持的手持式设备优于传统超声设备。
在肥胖患者中,有证据表明PPU能提高穿刺成功指标,但确定性极低至中等,且未显示不良反应增加迹象。应使用PPU减少穿刺尝试次数。需要进一步遵循标准化结局定义的研究以给出明确建议。
研究方案已在国际系统评价前瞻性注册库注册(国际系统评价前瞻性注册库:CRD42022368271)。