Suppr超能文献

通过触诊法识别图菲埃线的准确性:肥胖、怀孕和对照组的横断面比较研究。

Accuracy of Tuffier's Line Identification by Palpation Method: Cross-Sectional Comparative Study Among Obese, Pregnant and Control Groups.

作者信息

Malik Mehreen, Ismail Samina

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.

出版信息

Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2020 Apr;48(2):108-114. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2019.82346. Epub 2019 Oct 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Performance of safe central neuraxial blocks requires identification of accurate vertebral interspace. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of palpation method by confirmation with ultrasound in high-risk groups like obesity and pregnancy.

METHODS

This cross-sectional comparative study was conducted after approval from the hospital ethics committee and written informed consent from participants. Participants were enrolled into four groups: normal weight non-pregnant (N), full-term pregnant (P), obese (O) and obese full-term pregnant (PO). Tuffier's line at L4-L5 interspace was determined by palpation method and marked as P-line. Another examiner blinded to the marking done by palpation method confirmed it by ultrasound. The primary endpoint was to determine the accuracy of the palpation method, defined as true identification of Tuffier's line at the L4-L5 interspace by confirming it with ultrasound among four groups. Proportion and percentage were computed and analysed the true identification of Tuffier's line at L4-L5 by chi-square test at 0.008 adjusted level of significance for multiple comparisons.

RESULTS

Tuffier's line identification by palpation method was confirmed by ultrasound scanning at L4-L5 interspace in 75.3% (226/300) of participants. Proportion difference of true identification of Tuffier's line at L4-L5 by palpation and ultrasound was statistically significant among the groups (p=0.0005). True identification was significantly lower in group PO [36.4%; p=0.0005<0.008] and group O [34%; p=0.0005<0.008] as compared to that in group N.

CONCLUSION

Palpation method was found to be the inaccurate surrogate for the L4-L5 vertebral interspace for obesity with or without pregnancy.

摘要

目的

安全实施中枢神经轴阻滞需要准确识别椎间隙。本研究旨在通过超声确认,评估肥胖和妊娠等高危人群中触诊法的准确性。

方法

本横断面比较研究在获得医院伦理委员会批准并得到参与者书面知情同意后进行。参与者被分为四组:正常体重非妊娠组(N)、足月妊娠组(P)、肥胖组(O)和肥胖足月妊娠组(PO)。通过触诊法确定L4-L5椎间隙的Tuffier线,并标记为P线。另一位对触诊法标记不知情的检查者通过超声进行确认。主要终点是确定触诊法的准确性,定义为在四组中通过超声确认L4-L5椎间隙的Tuffier线的正确识别。计算比例和百分比,并通过卡方检验在0.008的调整显著性水平下分析L4-L5处Tuffier线的正确识别情况,以进行多重比较。

结果

通过超声扫描,在75.3%(226/300)的参与者中,触诊法确定的Tuffier线在L4-L5椎间隙得到确认。触诊法和超声法在L4-L5处Tuffier线正确识别的比例差异在各组间具有统计学意义(p = 0.0005)。与N组相比,PO组[36.4%;p = 0.0005 < 0.008]和O组[34%;p = 0.0005 < 0.008]的正确识别率显著较低。

结论

对于有或没有妊娠的肥胖人群,触诊法被发现是L4-L5椎间隙不准确的替代方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57bb/7101188/efd4181619bc/TARD-48-2-108-g01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验