• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

化脓性汗腺炎中的人工智能:面向患者信息的专家评估

AI in Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Expert Evaluation of Patient-Facing Information.

作者信息

Ezanno Anne-Cécile, Fougerousse Anne-Claire, Pruvost-Balland Christelle, Maccari François, Fite Charlotte

机构信息

Department of Digestive, Surgery, Begin Military Teaching Hospital, Saint Mandé, France.

Department of Dermatology, Begin Military Teaching Hospital, Saint Mandé, France.

出版信息

Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2024 Nov 2;17:2459-2464. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S478309. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.2147/CCID.S478309
PMID:39507766
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11539865/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study investigates the accuracy of Artificial Intelligence (AI) chatbots, ChatGPT and Bard, in providing information on Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS), aiming to explore their potential in assisting HS patients by offering insights into symptoms, thus possibly reducing the diagnostic and treatment time gap.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Using questions formulated with the help of HS patient associations, both ChatGPT and Bard were assessed. Responses to these questions were evaluated by 18 hS experts.

RESULTS

ChatGPT's responses were considered accurate in 86% of cases, significantly outperforming Bard, which only achieved 14% accuracy. Despite the general efficacy of ChatGPT in providing relevant information across a range of HS-related queries, both AI systems showed limitations in offering adequate advice on treatments. The study identifies a significant difference in the performance of the two AIs, emphasizing the need for improvement in AI-driven medical advice, particularly regarding treatment options.

CONCLUSION

The study highlights the potential of AI chatbots, particularly ChatGPT, in supporting HS patients by improving symptom understanding and potentially reducing the time to diagnosis and treatment. AI chatbots, while promising, cannot yet substitute for professional medical diagnosis and treatment, indicating the importance of enhancing AI capabilities for more accurate and reliable medical information dissemination.

摘要

目的

本研究调查了人工智能(AI)聊天机器人ChatGPT和Bard在提供化脓性汗腺炎(HS)相关信息方面的准确性,旨在探索它们通过提供症状见解来帮助HS患者的潜力,从而可能缩短诊断和治疗的时间间隔。

患者与方法

借助HS患者协会制定的问题,对ChatGPT和Bard进行了评估。18位HS专家对这些问题的回答进行了评估。

结果

ChatGPT的回答在86%的情况下被认为是准确的,显著优于Bard,后者的准确率仅为14%。尽管ChatGPT在提供一系列与HS相关问题的相关信息方面总体有效,但两个AI系统在提供充分的治疗建议方面都存在局限性。该研究确定了两种AI在性能上的显著差异,强调了改进AI驱动的医疗建议的必要性,特别是在治疗选择方面。

结论

该研究强调了AI聊天机器人,特别是ChatGPT,在通过改善症状理解和潜在缩短诊断和治疗时间来支持HS患者方面的潜力。AI聊天机器人虽然前景广阔,但尚不能替代专业的医学诊断和治疗,这表明增强AI能力以更准确可靠地传播医学信息的重要性。

相似文献

1
AI in Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Expert Evaluation of Patient-Facing Information.化脓性汗腺炎中的人工智能:面向患者信息的专家评估
Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2024 Nov 2;17:2459-2464. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S478309. eCollection 2024.
2
Performance of ChatGPT-4 and Bard chatbots in responding to common patient questions on prostate cancer Lu-PSMA-617 therapy.ChatGPT-4和Bard聊天机器人在回答关于前列腺癌Lu-PSMA-617疗法常见患者问题方面的表现
Front Oncol. 2024 Jul 12;14:1386718. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1386718. eCollection 2024.
3
Assessing the Accuracy of Information on Medication Abortion: A Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT and Google Bard AI.评估药物流产信息的准确性:ChatGPT与谷歌巴德人工智能的比较分析
Cureus. 2024 Jan 2;16(1):e51544. doi: 10.7759/cureus.51544. eCollection 2024 Jan.
4
Performance of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots on Glaucoma Questions Adapted From Patient Brochures.人工智能聊天机器人对改编自患者手册的青光眼问题的回答情况。
Cureus. 2024 Mar 23;16(3):e56766. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56766. eCollection 2024 Mar.
5
Evaluating the Efficacy of ChatGPT as a Patient Education Tool in Prostate Cancer: Multimetric Assessment.评估 ChatGPT 在前列腺癌患者教育中的疗效:多指标评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 14;26:e55939. doi: 10.2196/55939.
6
Evaluating ChatGPT to test its robustness as an interactive information database of radiation oncology and to assess its responses to common queries from radiotherapy patients: A single institution investigation.评估ChatGPT以测试其作为放射肿瘤学交互式信息数据库的稳健性,并评估其对放疗患者常见问题的回答:一项单机构调查。
Cancer Radiother. 2024 Jun;28(3):258-264. doi: 10.1016/j.canrad.2023.11.005. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
7
Accuracy and Readability of Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Responses to Vasectomy-Related Questions: Public Beware.人工智能聊天机器人对输精管切除术相关问题回答的准确性和可读性:公众需谨慎。
Cureus. 2024 Aug 28;16(8):e67996. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67996. eCollection 2024 Aug.
8
Assessing the Accuracy of Generative Conversational Artificial Intelligence in Debunking Sleep Health Myths: Mixed Methods Comparative Study With Expert Analysis.评估生成式对话人工智能在破除睡眠健康误区方面的准确性:采用专家分析的混合方法比较研究
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Apr 16;8:e55762. doi: 10.2196/55762.
9
Generative artificial intelligence chatbots may provide appropriate informational responses to common vascular surgery questions by patients.生成式人工智能聊天机器人可能会为患者关于常见血管外科问题提供恰当的信息性回复。
Vascular. 2025 Feb;33(1):229-237. doi: 10.1177/17085381241240550. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
10
The performance of artificial intelligence chatbot large language models to address skeletal biology and bone health queries.人工智能聊天机器人大型语言模型在解决骨骼生物学和骨骼健康问题方面的表现。
J Bone Miner Res. 2024 Mar 22;39(2):106-115. doi: 10.1093/jbmr/zjad007.

引用本文的文献

1
Towards a Paradigm Shift in Delivering Hidradenitis Suppurativa Care: a Narrative Review.朝着化脓性汗腺炎护理的范式转变:一项叙述性综述
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2025 Jun 29. doi: 10.1007/s13555-025-01462-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Security Implications of AI Chatbots in Health Care.人工智能聊天机器人在医疗保健中的安全隐患。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Nov 28;25:e47551. doi: 10.2196/47551.
2
Evaluation of the Performance of Generative AI Large Language Models ChatGPT, Google Bard, and Microsoft Bing Chat in Supporting Evidence-Based Dentistry: Comparative Mixed Methods Study.评估生成式 AI 大语言模型 ChatGPT、Google Bard 和 Microsoft Bing Chat 在支持循证牙科方面的性能:比较混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Dec 28;25:e51580. doi: 10.2196/51580.
3
The Potential of ChatGPT as a Self-Diagnostic Tool in Common Orthopedic Diseases: Exploratory Study.
ChatGPT 在常见骨科疾病自我诊断中的潜力:探索性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Sep 15;25:e47621. doi: 10.2196/47621.
4
ChatGPT and Generating a Differential Diagnosis Early in an Emergency Department Presentation.ChatGPT与急诊科就诊早期的鉴别诊断生成
Ann Emerg Med. 2024 Jan;83(1):83-86. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2023.08.003. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
5
How AI Responds to Common Lung Cancer Questions: ChatGPT vs Google Bard.人工智能如何回答常见肺癌问题:ChatGPT 与 Google Bard 对比。
Radiology. 2023 Jun;307(5):e230922. doi: 10.1148/radiol.230922.
6
ChatGPT Utility in Healthcare Education, Research, and Practice: Systematic Review on the Promising Perspectives and Valid Concerns.ChatGPT在医学教育、研究与实践中的应用:对其前景与合理担忧的系统评价
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Mar 19;11(6):887. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11060887.
7
Diagnostic Accuracy of Differential-Diagnosis Lists Generated by Generative Pretrained Transformer 3 Chatbot for Clinical Vignettes with Common Chief Complaints: A Pilot Study.基于生成式预训练 Transformer 3 聊天机器人为常见主诉临床病例生成鉴别诊断列表的诊断准确性:一项初步研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 15;20(4):3378. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043378.
8
Responses to addiction help-seeking from Alexa, Siri, Google Assistant, Cortana, and Bixby intelligent virtual assistants.对来自Alexa、Siri、谷歌助手、Cortana和Bixby智能虚拟助手的成瘾求助响应。
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Jan 29;3:11. doi: 10.1038/s41746-019-0215-9. eCollection 2020.
9
[Misdiagnosis of hidradenitis suppurativa continues to be a major issue. The R-ENS Verneuil study].[化脓性汗腺炎的误诊仍是一个主要问题。R-ENS韦尔纳伊研究]
Ann Dermatol Venereol. 2018 May;145(5):331-338. doi: 10.1016/j.annder.2018.01.043. Epub 2018 Apr 26.