• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ELITA 飞秒激光角膜屈光性微透镜取出术中组织界面中断厚度的特征。

Characterization of Disrupted Tissue Interface Thickness for Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction Procedure With ELITA Femtosecond Laser.

机构信息

Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Milpitas, CA, USA.

出版信息

Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2024 Nov 4;13(11):3. doi: 10.1167/tvst.13.11.3.

DOI:10.1167/tvst.13.11.3
PMID:39508778
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11547253/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study identified and compared variables causing changes in corneal tissue structure following the smooth incision lenticular keratomileusis (SILK) procedure using the ELITA Femtosecond Laser System by characterizing the resulting disrupted tissue interface.

METHODS

Seventy-one ex vivo porcine eyes and six human cadaver eyes underwent ELITA SILK with diverse surgical steps, pulse energies, scan overlaps, and surgical methods. Flaps created with the iFS Advanced Femtosecond Laser and ELITA systems were also evaluated. The disrupted interface thickness was determined by imaging corneal layers at different depths through the interface with confocal microscopy and counting layers with elevated backscattered light via computer program-assisted, subject-matter-expert visual judgment with blinding.

RESULTS

The disrupted interface thickness for ELITA SILK was 25 ± 3 µm; for the ELITA flap, it was 25 ± 2 µm; and for the iFS flap, it was 32 ± 3 µm. Factors influencing the total ELITA SILK disrupted interface thickness included laser pulse energy (0.11 µm/nJ; P < 0.01), scan overlap (5 µm; P < 0.01), and mechanical manipulation (7 µm; P < 0.01). Varying surgical techniques for mechanical manipulation resulted in a difference in disrupted interface thickness of 4 µm (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The ELITA SILK disrupted interface thickness was less than that of the iFS flap and similar to that of the ELITA flap. Assessing disrupted interface thickness identified factors influencing the quality of the corneal interface with SILK.

TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE

The disrupted interface thickness, a new method for measuring corneal damage, has been used to quantify the potential effects of various refractive surgery factors on surgical outcomes.

摘要

目的

本研究通过对使用 ELITA 飞秒激光系统行平滑切口透镜角膜磨镶术(SILK)后角膜组织结构变化的变量进行识别和比较,来描述由此产生的组织界面破坏情况。

方法

71 只离体猪眼和 6 只人尸眼接受了具有不同手术步骤、脉冲能量、扫描重叠和手术方法的 ELITA SILK 手术。还评估了使用 iFS 高级飞秒激光和 ELITA 系统制作的角膜瓣。使用共焦显微镜通过界面在不同深度成像角膜层,并通过计算机程序辅助、主题专家视觉判断(盲法)计算具有回散射光升高的层来确定破坏的界面厚度。

结果

ELITA SILK 的破坏界面厚度为 25 ± 3 µm;ELITA 角膜瓣为 25 ± 2 µm;iFS 角膜瓣为 32 ± 3 µm。影响总 ELITA SILK 破坏界面厚度的因素包括激光脉冲能量(0.11 µm/nJ;P < 0.01)、扫描重叠(5 µm;P < 0.01)和机械操作(7 µm;P < 0.01)。不同的机械操作技术导致破坏界面厚度差异为 4 µm(P < 0.01)。

结论

ELITA SILK 的破坏界面厚度小于 iFS 角膜瓣,与 ELITA 角膜瓣相似。评估破坏界面厚度确定了影响 SILK 角膜界面质量的因素。

翻译

钟佳惠

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7ea/11547253/80e90096d131/tvst-13-11-3-f007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7ea/11547253/e5e2d83eceff/tvst-13-11-3-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7ea/11547253/e89fe5bdf171/tvst-13-11-3-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7ea/11547253/47216559242c/tvst-13-11-3-f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7ea/11547253/3c3917111e65/tvst-13-11-3-f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7ea/11547253/52a4bfd6e3d4/tvst-13-11-3-f005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7ea/11547253/023c03afd8ab/tvst-13-11-3-f006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7ea/11547253/80e90096d131/tvst-13-11-3-f007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7ea/11547253/e5e2d83eceff/tvst-13-11-3-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7ea/11547253/e89fe5bdf171/tvst-13-11-3-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7ea/11547253/47216559242c/tvst-13-11-3-f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7ea/11547253/3c3917111e65/tvst-13-11-3-f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7ea/11547253/52a4bfd6e3d4/tvst-13-11-3-f005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7ea/11547253/023c03afd8ab/tvst-13-11-3-f006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7ea/11547253/80e90096d131/tvst-13-11-3-f007.jpg

相似文献

1
Characterization of Disrupted Tissue Interface Thickness for Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction Procedure With ELITA Femtosecond Laser.ELITA 飞秒激光角膜屈光性微透镜取出术中组织界面中断厚度的特征。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2024 Nov 4;13(11):3. doi: 10.1167/tvst.13.11.3.
2
Comparison of corneal flap thickness predictability and architecture between femtosecond laser and sub-Bowman keratomileusis microkeratome in laser in situ keratomileusis.飞秒激光与准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术中亚氏膜间角膜磨镶术微型角膜刀制作角膜瓣的厚度预测性和形态学比较。
Int Ophthalmol. 2023 May;43(5):1553-1558. doi: 10.1007/s10792-022-02551-8. Epub 2022 Oct 29.
3
Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) versus laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for correcting myopia.准分子激光上皮下角膜磨镶术(LASEK)与准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)治疗近视的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 15;2(2):CD011080. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011080.pub2.
4
Comparison of Corneal Biomechanics Treated With Femtosecond Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis and Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction by New Corneal Biomechanical Parameters of Corvis ST II.应用 Corvis ST II 新型角膜生物力学参数比较飞秒激光辅助原位角膜磨镶术和小切口微透镜取出术治疗的角膜生物力学
Cornea. 2023 Nov 1;42(11):1384-1390. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000003191. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
5
How Effective is Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction Surgery (KLEx) in Reducing Dry Eye Outcomes Compared to LASIK?: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.与准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)相比,角膜屈光透镜切除术(KLEx)在减少干眼结局方面的效果如何?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Refract Surg. 2025 Aug;41(8):e839-e854. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20250506-07. Epub 2025 Aug 1.
6
Enhancement using CIRCLE software post cornea lenticule extraction for advanced refractive correction.使用CIRCLE软件在角膜透镜取出术后进行强化以实现高级屈光矫正。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2025 Jul 1;73(7):1012-1015. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_2186_24. Epub 2025 Apr 17.
7
IntraLase femtosecond laser vs mechanical microkeratomes in LASIK for myopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.飞秒激光角膜层间光动力治疗与机械角膜板层刀制瓣在 LASIK 治疗近视中的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Refract Surg. 2012 Jan;28(1):15-24. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20111228-02.
8
Excimer laser refractive surgery versus phakic intraocular lenses for the correction of moderate to high myopia.准分子激光屈光手术与有晶状体眼人工晶状体矫正中高度近视的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 17;2014(6):CD007679. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007679.pub4.
9
[Comparison of visual outcomes between corneal topography-guided FS-LASIK and SMILE for myopia and myopic astigmatism: a network meta-analysis].角膜地形图引导的飞秒激光原位角膜磨镶术与小切口基质透镜切除术治疗近视及近视散光的视觉效果比较:一项网状Meta分析
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Dec 11;60(12):1004-1012. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20240108-00014.
10
Excimer laser refractive surgery versus phakic intraocular lenses for the correction of moderate to high myopia.准分子激光屈光手术与有晶状体眼人工晶状体矫正中高度近视的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jan 18;1:CD007679. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007679.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
Safety and Effectiveness of Smooth Incision Lenticular Keratomileusis (SILK) Using the ELITA Femtosecond Laser System for Correction of Myopic and Astigmatic Refractive Errors.使用ELITA飞秒激光系统进行平滑切口晶状体角膜磨镶术(SILK)矫正近视和散光屈光不正的安全性和有效性。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2023 Dec 8;17:3761-3773. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S432459. eCollection 2023.
2
Atomic force microscopy for the evaluation of corneal surface roughness after femtosecond laser flap creation and excimer ablation.飞秒激光制瓣与准分子激光消融术后角膜表面粗糙度的原子力显微镜评估
Int Ophthalmol. 2023 Nov;43(11):4131-4136. doi: 10.1007/s10792-023-02821-z. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
3
Comparative study of functional optical zone: small incision lenticule extraction versus femtosecond laser assisted excimer laser keratomileusis.
功能性光学区的比较研究:小切口飞秒透镜切除术与飞秒激光辅助准分子原位角膜磨镶术
Int J Ophthalmol. 2023 Feb 18;16(2):238-244. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2023.02.10. eCollection 2023.
4
Laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with a mechanical microkeratome compared to LASIK with a femtosecond laser for LASIK in adults with myopia or myopic astigmatism.与使用飞秒激光进行准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)相比,使用机械微型角膜刀进行的成人近视或近视散光准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 7;4(4):CD012946. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012946.pub2.
5
Histological and immunohistochemical characterization of the porcine ocular surface.猪眼表面的组织学和免疫组织化学特征。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 13;15(1):e0227732. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227732. eCollection 2020.
6
Comparison of Visual, Refractive and Ocular Surface Outcomes Between Small Incision Lenticule Extraction and Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis for Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism.小切口透镜切除术与准分子原位角膜磨镶术治疗近视及近视散光的视觉、屈光和眼表结局比较
Ophthalmol Ther. 2019 Sep;8(3):373-386. doi: 10.1007/s40123-019-0202-x. Epub 2019 Jul 19.
7
Visual and optical quality outcomes of SMILE and FS-LASIK for myopia in the very early phase after surgery.飞秒激光小切口基质透镜切除术(SMILE)和飞秒激光原位角膜磨镶术(FS-LASIK)治疗近视术后早期的视觉和光学质量结果
BMC Ophthalmol. 2019 Apr 8;19(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12886-019-1096-z.
8
Interface healing and its correlation with visual recovery and quality of vision following small incision lenticule extraction.小切口透镜切除术的界面愈合及其与视觉恢复和视觉质量的相关性。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2018 Feb;66(2):212-218. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_775_17.
9
Lower Laser Energy Levels Lead to Better Visual Recovery After Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction: Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial.低激光能量水平导致小切口透镜切除术术后视力恢复更佳:前瞻性随机临床试验
Am J Ophthalmol. 2017 Jul;179:159-170. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2017.05.005. Epub 2017 May 10.
10
Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) versus Femtosecond Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) for Myopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.小切口透镜切除术(SMILE)与飞秒激光原位角膜磨镶术(FS-LASIK)治疗近视的系统评价和荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 1;11(7):e0158176. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158176. eCollection 2016.