• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康的个体层面数字决定因素与患者门户网站的技术接受度:横断面评估

Individual-Level Digital Determinants of Health and Technology Acceptance of Patient Portals: Cross-Sectional Assessment.

作者信息

Philpot Lindsey M, Ramar Priya, Roellinger Daniel L, Njeru Jane W, Ebbert Jon O

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.

Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Form Res. 2024 Jun 10;8:e56493. doi: 10.2196/56493.

DOI:10.2196/56493
PMID:38695754
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11196914/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Digital determinants of health (DDoH), including access to technological tools and digital health literacy, function independently as barriers to health. Assessment for DDoH is not routine within most health care systems, although addressing DDoH could help mitigate differential health outcomes and the digital divide.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to assess the role of individual-level DDoH factors on patient enrollment in and use of the patient portal.

METHODS

We developed a multimodal, cross-sectional survey and deployed it to 11,424 individuals based on their preferred mode and language documented within the electronic medical record. Based on the Technology Acceptance Model, enrollment in and intent to use the patient portal were the outcomes of interest. Perceived usefulness and ease of use were assessed to determine construct validity, and exploratory investigations included individual-level DDoH, including internet and device access, availability of technological support, medical complexity, individual relationship with the health care system, and digital health literacy. Counts (n) and proportions (%) were used to describe response categories, and adjusted and unadjusted odds ratios are reported.

RESULTS

This study included 1850 respondents (11,424 invited, 16.2% response rate), who were mostly female (1048/1850, 56.6%) and White (1240/1850, 67%), with an average age of 63 years. In the validation of the Technology Acceptance Model, measures of perceived ease of use (ie, using the patient portal will require a lot of mental effort; the patient portal will be very easy to use) and perceived usefulness (ie, the usefulness of the patient portal to send and receive messages with providers, schedule appointments, and refill medications) were positively associated with both enrollment in and intent to use the patient portal. Within adjusted models, perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness constructs, in addition to constructs of digital health literacy, knowing what health resources are available on the internet (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.5, 95% CI 1.8-6.6), portal ease of use (aOR 2.8, 95% CI 1.6-5), and portal usefulness (aOR 2.4, 95% CI 1.4-4.2) were significantly associated with patient portal enrollment. Other factors associated with patient portal enrollment and intent to use included being comfortable reading and speaking English, reported use of the internet to surf the web or to send or receive emails, home internet access, and access to technology devices (computer, tablet, smartphone, etc).

CONCLUSIONS

Assessing for and addressing individual-level DDoH, including digital health literacy, access to digital tools and technologies, and support of the relational aspects between patients, social support systems, and health care providers, could help mitigate disparities in health. By focusing efforts to assess for and address individual-level DDoH, an opportunity exists to improve digitally driven health care delivery outcomes like access and structural outcomes like bias built within algorithms created with incomplete representation across communities.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a9f/11196914/aa955cf0dbb0/formative_v8i1e56493_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a9f/11196914/a4504d4b7f29/formative_v8i1e56493_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a9f/11196914/41a1f7c7624a/formative_v8i1e56493_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a9f/11196914/aa955cf0dbb0/formative_v8i1e56493_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a9f/11196914/a4504d4b7f29/formative_v8i1e56493_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a9f/11196914/41a1f7c7624a/formative_v8i1e56493_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a9f/11196914/aa955cf0dbb0/formative_v8i1e56493_fig3.jpg
摘要

背景

健康的数字决定因素(DDoH),包括获取技术工具和数字健康素养,本身就是健康的障碍。在大多数医疗保健系统中,对DDoH的评估并非常规操作,尽管解决DDoH有助于减轻健康差异和数字鸿沟。

目的

本研究旨在评估个体层面的DDoH因素对患者注册使用患者门户网站的作用。

方法

我们开发了一项多模式横断面调查,并根据电子病历中记录的患者偏好模式和语言,将其部署给11424名个体。基于技术接受模型,注册使用患者门户网站和使用意愿是感兴趣的结果。评估感知有用性和易用性以确定结构效度,探索性调查包括个体层面的DDoH,包括互联网和设备接入、技术支持的可用性、医疗复杂性、个体与医疗保健系统的关系以及数字健康素养。使用计数(n)和比例(%)来描述回答类别,并报告调整和未调整的优势比。

结果

本研究包括1850名受访者(邀请了11424人,回复率为16.2%),大多数为女性(1048/1850,56.6%)和白人(1240/1850,67%),平均年龄为63岁。在技术接受模型的验证中,感知易用性(即使用患者门户网站需要大量脑力;患者门户网站将非常易于使用)和感知有用性(即患者门户网站对与提供者发送和接收消息、预约和重新开药的有用性)的测量与注册使用患者门户网站和使用意愿均呈正相关。在调整模型中,感知易用性和感知有用性结构,以及数字健康素养结构,知道互联网上有哪些健康资源(调整优势比[aOR]3.5,95%CI 1.8 - 6.6)、门户网站易用性(aOR 2.8,95%CI 1.6 - 5)和门户网站有用性(aOR 2.4,95%CI 1.4 - 4.2)与患者门户网站注册显著相关。与患者门户网站注册和使用意愿相关的其他因素包括能够自如地阅读和说英语、报告使用互联网浏览网页或发送或接收电子邮件、家庭互联网接入以及使用技术设备(计算机、平板电脑、智能手机等)。

结论

评估和解决个体层面的DDoH,包括数字健康素养、数字工具和技术的获取以及患者、社会支持系统和医疗保健提供者之间关系方面的支持,有助于减轻健康差异。通过集中精力评估和解决个体层面的DDoH,存在改善数字驱动的医疗保健服务结果(如可及性)以及结构性结果(如算法中因社区代表性不完整而产生的偏差)的机会。

相似文献

1
Individual-Level Digital Determinants of Health and Technology Acceptance of Patient Portals: Cross-Sectional Assessment.健康的个体层面数字决定因素与患者门户网站的技术接受度:横断面评估
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Jun 10;8:e56493. doi: 10.2196/56493.
2
Determinants of Use of the Care Information Exchange Portal: Cross-sectional Study.使用护理信息交换门户的决定因素:横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Nov 11;23(11):e23481. doi: 10.2196/23481.
3
Differences in Access to and Preferences for Using Patient Portals and Other eHealth Technologies Based on Race, Ethnicity, and Age: A Database and Survey Study of Seniors in a Large Health Plan.基于种族、族裔和年龄的患者门户网站及其他电子健康技术的使用机会和偏好差异:一项针对大型健康计划中老年人的数据库及调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Mar 4;18(3):e50. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5105.
4
Perceptions of Quality of Care Among Users of a Web-Based Patient Portal: Cross-sectional Survey Analysis.基于网络的患者门户用户对医疗质量的认知:横断面调查分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Nov 17;24(11):e39973. doi: 10.2196/39973.
5
Use and the Users of a Patient Portal: Cross-Sectional Study.患者门户网站的使用情况及用户:横断面研究
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Sep 17;20(9):e262. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9418.
6
The Use of Technology for Communicating With Clinicians or Seeking Health Information in a Multilingual Urban Cohort: Cross-Sectional Survey.在多语言城市人群中使用技术与临床医生沟通或获取健康信息:横断面调查
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Apr 6;22(4):e16951. doi: 10.2196/16951.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
Digital Health Literacy During the COVID-19 Pandemic Among Health Care Providers in Resource-Limited Settings: Cross-sectional Study.资源有限环境下医疗保健提供者在新冠疫情期间的数字健康素养:横断面研究
JMIR Nurs. 2022 Nov 14;5(1):e39866. doi: 10.2196/39866.
9
Digitally Disconnected: Qualitative Study of Patient Perspectives on the Digital Divide and Potential Solutions.数字鸿沟:关于患者对数字鸿沟及潜在解决方案看法的定性研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2021 Dec 15;8(4):e33364. doi: 10.2196/33364.
10
Disparities in Patient-Reported Interest in Web-Based Patient Portals: Survey at an Urban Academic Safety-Net Hospital.患者报告的对基于网络的患者门户的兴趣差异:在一家城市学术安全网医院进行的调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Mar 26;21(3):e11421. doi: 10.2196/11421.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient-Derived Design Principles for Technology-Enabled Healing at Home Following Hospital Discharge: Mixed Methods Study.出院后在家中借助技术实现康复的患者衍生设计原则:混合方法研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Aug 20;12:e72913. doi: 10.2196/72913.
2
Assessing the Ability to Use eHealth Resources Among Older Adults: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.评估老年人使用电子健康资源的能力:横断面调查研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Aug 6;9:e70672. doi: 10.2196/70672.
3
Usability testing of EatsUp®: mobile application for monitoring balanced dietary practices and active lifestyle among adolescents-a study in Jakarta, Indonesia.

本文引用的文献

1
Disparities in Patient Portal Use Among Adults With Chronic Conditions.慢性病患者患者门户使用的差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Feb 5;7(2):e240680. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.0680.
2
An introduction to digital determinants of health.健康数字决定因素介绍。
PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Jan 4;3(1):e0000346. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000346. eCollection 2024 Jan.
3
Progress and Persistent Disparities in Patient Access to Electronic Health Information.患者获取电子健康信息的进展和持续差距。
EatsUp®的可用性测试:一款用于监测青少年均衡饮食习惯和积极生活方式的移动应用程序——印度尼西亚雅加达的一项研究
Front Digit Health. 2025 Jun 13;7:1506952. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1506952. eCollection 2025.
4
Leveraging Technology to Engage Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Consumers With Children at Farmers Markets: Qualitative Community-Engaged Approach to App Development.利用技术让参与补充营养援助计划的有孩子的消费者在农贸市场参与活动:应用程序开发的定性社区参与方法
JMIR Form Res. 2025 May 16;9:e70104. doi: 10.2196/70104.
5
Study on the relationship between depressive symptoms and Internet use in the older adults under the background of population aging-evidence based on CHARLS 2018 and 2020.人口老龄化背景下老年人抑郁症状与互联网使用的关系研究——基于2018年和2020年中国健康与养老追踪调查(CHARLS)的证据
BMC Public Health. 2025 Mar 19;25(1):1057. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22141-4.
6
Perceptions, Experiences, and Beliefs About Patient Portals Among Women With Limited English Proficiency: Multicultural Qualitative Interview Study.英语水平有限的女性对患者门户网站的认知、体验和信念:多元文化定性访谈研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 26;27:e60699. doi: 10.2196/60699.
7
Digital health literacy and use of patient portals among Spanish-preferred patients in the United States: a cross-sectional assessment.美国西班牙裔偏好患者的数字健康素养与患者门户使用情况:一项横断面评估
Front Public Health. 2024 Dec 10;12:1455395. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1455395. eCollection 2024.
8
Examining Whether Patient Portal and Video Visit Use Differs by Race and Ethnicity Among Older Adults in a US Integrated Health Care Delivery System: Cross-Sectional Electronic Health Record and Survey-Based Study.考察在美国一体化医疗服务提供系统中,老年患者使用患者门户和视频访问的情况是否因种族和民族而异:基于电子健康记录和调查的横断面研究。
JMIR Aging. 2024 Nov 7;7:e63814. doi: 10.2196/63814.
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Nov 3;4(11):e233883. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.3883.
4
When Positive is Negative: Health Literacy Barriers to Patient Access to Clinical Laboratory Test Results.当阳性变阴性:患者获取临床实验室检验结果的健康素养障碍。
J Appl Lab Med. 2023 Nov 2;8(6):1133-1147. doi: 10.1093/jalm/jfad045.
5
eHealth Literacy and Patient Portal Use and Attitudes: Cross-sectional Observational Study.电子健康素养与患者门户网站的使用及态度:横断面观察性研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2023 Jan 27;10:e40105. doi: 10.2196/40105.
6
Patient-Centered Digital Health Records and Their Effects on Health Outcomes: Systematic Review.以患者为中心的数字化健康档案及其对健康结果的影响:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Dec 22;24(12):e43086. doi: 10.2196/43086.
7
Health literacy and digital health information-seeking behavior - a cross-sectional study among highly educated Swedes.健康素养与数字健康信息搜索行为——一项针对高学历瑞典人的横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Dec 5;22(1):2278. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14751-z.
8
Impact of patient portal-based self-scheduling of diagnostic imaging studies on health disparities.基于患者门户的诊断影像学研究自助预约对健康差异的影响。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Nov 14;29(12):2096-2100. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac152.
9
Association Between Patient Portal Use and Perceived Patient-Centered Communication Among Adults With Cancer: Cross-sectional Survey Study.癌症成年患者使用患者门户网站与感知到的以患者为中心的沟通之间的关联:横断面调查研究
JMIR Cancer. 2022 Aug 9;8(3):e34745. doi: 10.2196/34745.
10
A 3-Item Measure of Digital Health Care Literacy: Development and Validation Study.数字医疗保健素养的三项测量指标:开发与验证研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Apr 29;6(4):e36043. doi: 10.2196/36043.