Suppr超能文献

两种基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱法检测肠杆菌科碳青霉烯酶的比较。

A comparison of two MALDI-TOF MS based assays for the detection of carbapenemases in Enterobacterales.

机构信息

Diagnostic and Research Institute of Hygiene, Microbiology and Environmental Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 7;14(1):27086. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-77952-z.

Abstract

Carbapenem resistant (CRE) and carbapenemase producing Enterobacterales (CPE) in particular, represent a major threat for healthcare systems worldwide. Rapid, reliable, and easy to perform assays are required to enable targeted and effective therapy. MALDI-TOF MS based carbapenemase diagnostics has potential advantages over molecular and phenotypic sensitivity tests, especially in terms of time to result. So far, only one mass spectrometry (MS)-based carbapenemase test system is commercially available for routine use. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of the established system to a novel MS-based test to identify CPE isolates. Forty consecutive CRE isolates (70% CPEs) were pre-screened for carbapenemase activity by routine laboratory methods. Isolates then were tested using the to date only IVD CE certified MALDI-TOF MS carbapenemase detection assay (MBT STAR-Carba IVD Kit; Bruker Daltonics) and a novel test designed for the recently launched EXS2600 MALDI-TOF MS system (Carbapenemase Activity Kit; Zybio). Valid results were obtained for 93% and 85% isolates by the Bruker and the Zybio assay, respectively. Sensitivities, specificities, positive and negative predictive values were 92%, 91%, 96%, and 83% for the Bruker assay and 96%, 64%, 85%, and 88% for the Zybio assay. There are notable differences concerning the handling of the assays. In summary, both systems featured high sensitivities for the detection of carbapenemases, but the Bruker assay yielded less false-positive results. There are advantages and disadvantages concerning the handling for each system, but both proved to be suitable for the use in a routine laboratory.

摘要

碳青霉烯耐药(CRE)和产碳青霉烯酶肠杆菌科(CPE)尤其对全球医疗保健系统构成重大威胁。需要快速、可靠且易于执行的检测方法,以实现靶向和有效的治疗。MALDI-TOF MS 基于碳青霉烯酶诊断与分子和表型敏感性测试相比具有潜在优势,尤其是在结果时间方面。到目前为止,只有一种基于质谱(MS)的碳青霉烯酶测试系统可用于常规用途。本研究的目的是比较该已建立系统与一种新型 MS 基于测试的性能,以鉴定 CPE 分离株。连续 40 株 CRE 分离株(70%为 CPE)通过常规实验室方法进行了碳青霉烯酶活性的预筛选。然后使用迄今为止唯一的 IVD CE 认证的 MALDI-TOF MS 碳青霉烯酶检测试剂盒(MBT STAR-Carba IVD 试剂盒;布鲁克·道尔顿公司)和一种专为最近推出的 EXS2600 MALDI-TOF MS 系统设计的新型试剂盒(Carbapenemase Activity Kit;Zybio)对分离株进行了测试。布鲁克和 Zybio 测定法分别获得了 93%和 85%分离株的有效结果。布鲁克测定法的灵敏度、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值分别为 92%、91%、96%和 83%,而 Zybio 测定法的灵敏度、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值分别为 96%、64%、85%和 88%。这两种方法在操作方面存在显著差异。总之,这两种系统在检测碳青霉烯酶方面均具有较高的灵敏度,但布鲁克测定法产生的假阳性结果较少。每种系统在操作方面都有优缺点,但都被证明适用于常规实验室使用。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验