• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“隐性”工作与错失的机遇:提交至REF2021的护理研究及影响案例分析

'Hidden' work and lost opportunities: nursing research and impact case studies submitted to REF2021.

作者信息

Kent Bridie, Ali Parveen, Farquharson Barbara, Harris Ruth, Johnston Bridget, Kelly Daniel, Mckenna Hugh, McMahon Ann, Taylor Rachel M, Traynor Michael

机构信息

Professor, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.

Professor, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

J Res Nurs. 2024 Sep;29(6):469-480. doi: 10.1177/17449871241261971. Epub 2024 Oct 6.

DOI:10.1177/17449871241261971
PMID:39512641
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11539177/
Abstract

AIMS

(1) Identify and characterise the nursing contribution to impact case studies submitted to Research Excellence Framework (REF) 2021 across all Units of Assessment and compare this to those submitted to REF 2014; (2) Identify and characterise those impact case studies of relevance to nursing that did not include a nurse in the research team; (3) Compare the characteristics of impact case studies identified in Aim 2 with those that did include a nurse in the research team.

DESIGN

Desk-based analysis of REF2021 published data.

METHODS

We searched the REF2021 impact database with the term nurs* then sorted case studies into categories representing the involvement of nurses on the research team. We developed variables with which to examine the impact case studies (ICSs) and make comparisons.

RESULTS

One-fifth of ICSs involving a nurse researcher do not contribute to a visible body of 'nursing research' and is 'hidden' in other disciplines; research teams persistently fail to involve nurse researchers when researching topics of clear relevance to nurses and nursing.

CONCLUSION

Our findings provide insight into two topics of importance for nursing research: reputation, and failure to benefit from transdisciplinarity.

IMPACT

Benefit to nurse researchers from involvement in transdisciplinary research is still limited; some nursing research remains hidden.

摘要

目的

(1)识别并描述在提交给2021年卓越研究框架(REF)的所有评估单元中的影响案例研究中护理方面的贡献,并将其与提交给2014年REF的案例进行比较;(2)识别并描述与护理相关但研究团队中没有护士的影响案例研究;(3)比较目标2中识别出的影响案例研究的特征与研究团队中有护士的案例研究的特征。

设计

对REF2021公布的数据进行案头分析。

方法

我们在REF2021影响数据库中用“nurs*”进行搜索,然后将案例研究分类,以体现护士在研究团队中的参与情况。我们制定了变量,用于审查影响案例研究(ICSs)并进行比较。

结果

五分之一涉及护士研究人员的ICSs并未对“护理研究”的可见主体做出贡献,而是“隐藏”在其他学科中;在研究与护士和护理明显相关的主题时,研究团队一直未能让护士研究人员参与进来。

结论

我们的研究结果为护理研究中两个重要主题提供了见解:声誉,以及未能从跨学科研究中受益。

影响

护士研究人员参与跨学科研究的益处仍然有限;一些护理研究仍然不为人知。

相似文献

1
'Hidden' work and lost opportunities: nursing research and impact case studies submitted to REF2021.“隐性”工作与错失的机遇:提交至REF2021的护理研究及影响案例分析
J Res Nurs. 2024 Sep;29(6):469-480. doi: 10.1177/17449871241261971. Epub 2024 Oct 6.
2
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
The Lived Experience of Autistic Adults in Employment: A Systematic Search and Synthesis.成年自闭症患者的就业生活经历:系统检索与综述
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):495-509. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0114. eCollection 2024 Dec.
5
Developing evidence-based guidelines for describing potential benefits and harms within patient information leaflets/sheets (PILs) that inform and do not cause harm (PrinciPILs).制定基于证据的指南,用于在患者信息单页/说明书(PrinciPILs)中描述潜在益处和危害,这些信息单页既能提供信息又不会造成伤害。
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Aug;29(43):1-20. doi: 10.3310/GJJH2402.
6
Nurses as substitutes for doctors in primary care.护士在初级保健中替代医生的角色。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 16;7(7):CD001271. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001271.pub3.
7
Consequences, costs and cost-effectiveness of workforce configurations in English acute hospitals.英国急症医院劳动力配置的后果、成本及成本效益
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jul;13(25):1-107. doi: 10.3310/ZBAR9152.
8
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
9
Factors that influence the provision of intrapartum and postnatal care by skilled birth attendants in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响低收入和中等收入国家熟练助产士提供产时和产后护理的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 17;11(11):CD011558. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011558.pub2.
10
Experiences of gynecological cancer patients receiving care from specialist nurses: a qualitative systematic review.妇科癌症患者接受专科护士护理的体验:一项定性系统综述。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2017 Aug;15(8):2087-2112. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003126.

本文引用的文献

1
Research Quality-Lessons from the UK Research Excellence Framework (REF) 2021.研究质量——来自2021年英国卓越研究框架(REF)的经验教训
Nurs Rep. 2022 Jul 7;12(3):510-514. doi: 10.3390/nursrep12030048.
2
Impact, theory of change, and the horizons of scientific practice.影响、变革理论以及科学实践的范围。
Soc Stud Sci. 2021 Feb;51(1):100-120. doi: 10.1177/0306312720950830. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
3
The 'invisible' nursing RAE 2001--an analysis.2001年“隐形”护理科研评估——一项分析
Nurse Res. 2003;11(2):60-72. doi: 10.7748/cnp.v1.i7.pg6.
4
The United Kingdom research assessment exercise (RAE) 2001.2001年英国研究评估活动(RAE)
J Adv Nurs. 2002 Mar;37(6):497-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02169.x.
5
Endogenous and exogenous research? Findings from a bibliometric study of UK nursing research.内源性和外源性研究?英国护理研究文献计量学研究的结果
J Adv Nurs. 2001 Apr;34(2):212-22. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01747.x.
6
Nursing and the research assessment exercise: past, present and future.护理与研究评估活动:过去、现在与未来
J Adv Nurs. 1999 Jul;30(1):186-92. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1999.01063.x.
7
Survey looks at problems in university nursing research.调查关注大学护理研究中的问题。
Nurs Times. 1998;94(29):66-7.