研究质量——来自2021年英国卓越研究框架（REF）的经验教训
Research Quality-Lessons from the UK Research Excellence Framework (REF) 2021.
作者信息
Thompson David R, McKenna Hugh P
机构信息
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, UK.
School of Nursing, Ulster University, Newtownabbey BT37 0QB, UK.
出版信息
Nurs Rep. 2022 Jul 7;12(3):510-514. doi: 10.3390/nursrep12030048.
Abstract
Research quality is a term often bandied around but rarely clearly defined or measured [...].
摘要
研究质量是一个经常被提及但很少被明确界定或衡量的术语[...]。
相似文献
1
Research Quality-Lessons from the UK Research Excellence Framework (REF) 2021.研究质量——来自2021年英国卓越研究框架（REF）的经验教训
Nurs Rep. 2022 Jul 7;12(3):510-514. doi: 10.3390/nursrep12030048.
2
The increasing significance of impact within the Research Excellence Framework (REF).影响力在卓越研究框架（REF）中的重要性日益增加。
Radiography (Lond). 2020 Oct;26 Suppl 2:S17-S19. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2020.02.004. Epub 2020 Feb 29.
3
Beyond Academia - Interrogating Research Impact in the Research Excellence Framework.超越学术界——审视卓越研究框架中的研究影响力
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 20;11(12):e0168533. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168533. eCollection 2016.
4
UK Doubles Its "World-Leading" Research in Life Sciences and Medicine in Six Years: Testing the Claim?英国在六年内将其生命科学与医学领域“世界领先”的研究成果翻倍：这一说法经得起检验吗？
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 23;10(7):e0132990. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132990. eCollection 2015.
5
Leadership in preparations for the Research Excellence Framework.领导研究卓越框架的筹备工作。
J Dent. 2019 Aug;87:10-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2019.05.014. Epub 2019 May 7.
6
Using Google Scholar institutional level data to evaluate the quality of university research.利用谷歌学术机构层面数据评估大学研究质量。
Scientometrics. 2017;113(3):1627-1643. doi: 10.1007/s11192-017-2532-6. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
7
The impact of patient-reported outcome (PRO) data from clinical trials: a systematic review and critical analysis.临床试验中患者报告结局（PRO）数据的影响：系统评价和批判性分析。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019 Oct 16;17(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1220-z.
8
The UK Research Excellence Framework and the Matthew effect: Insights from machine learning.英国卓越研究框架与马太效应：来自机器学习的启示。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 26;13(11):e0207919. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207919. eCollection 2018.
9
'Excellence' and Exclusion: The Individual Costs of Institutional Competitiveness.“卓越”与排斥：制度竞争力的个体代价
Minerva. 2016;54:201-218. doi: 10.1007/s11024-016-9298-5. Epub 2016 May 4.
10
Where does good quality qualitative health care research get published?高质量的定性医疗保健研究成果发表在何处？
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2017 Sep;18(5):515-521. doi: 10.1017/S1463423617000251. Epub 2017 May 8.
引用本文的文献
1
Inequalities of provision of nationally funded clinical academic training awards for healthcare professionals: quantitative comparisons across the four nations of the UK.英国国家资助的医疗保健专业人员临床学术培训奖项提供方面的不平等：英国四个国家的定量比较。
J Res Nurs. 2025 Mar 15:17449871241291947. doi: 10.1177/17449871241291947.
2
'Hidden' work and lost opportunities: nursing research and impact case studies submitted to REF2021.“隐性”工作与错失的机遇：提交至REF2021的护理研究及影响案例分析
J Res Nurs. 2024 Sep;29(6):469-480. doi: 10.1177/17449871241261971. Epub 2024 Oct 6.
3
Key informants perspectives on creating a high impact research department in family and community medicine: a qualitative project.关键知情人对创建家庭医学和社区医学高影响力研究部门的看法：一个定性项目。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Feb 6;25(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02288-6.
本文引用的文献
1
A critical discussion regarding the scholarly development of the nursing profession - A call to action.
Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Mar;110:105249. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105249. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
2
Is the PhD well for nursing faculty running dry?护理师资枯竭，博士学位还合适吗？
J Nurs Manag. 2021 Sep;29(6):1349-1350. doi: 10.1111/jonm.13308.
3
Research in nursing, midwifery, and the allied health professions.护理、助产及相关健康专业领域的研究。
BMJ. 2003 Apr 19;326(7394):833-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7394.833.
Zotero 插件