• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加强医疗保健提供者对基于性别的暴力的应对:使用改良电子德尔菲法开发和验证一种评估工具

Enhancing Healthcare Providers' Response to Gender-Based Violence: Development and Validation of an Assessment Tool Using the Modified e-Delphi Approach.

作者信息

Kulkarni Namratha, Shaikh Rizwana, Havaldar Pavan

机构信息

Public Health, Jagadguru Gangadhar Mahaswamigalu Moorsavirmath Medical College, Karnataka Lingayat Education (KLE) Academy of Higher Education and Research, Hubballi, IND.

Anatomy, Gadag Institute of Medical Sciences, Gadag, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Oct 8;16(10):e71060. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71060. eCollection 2024 Oct.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.71060
PMID:39512952
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11541640/
Abstract

Background Effective gender-based violence (GBV) interventions depend on precise tools to assess healthcare providers' knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP). This study aimed to develop and validate a culturally appropriate GBV questionnaire on the KAP of healthcare workers in India using a modified e-Delphi method. Methodology The study used a modified e-Delphi approach, conducted online, to validate a GBV questionnaire. The process included the following three rounds: content validation, quantitative validation, and finalization. It began with a literature review and questionnaire drafting in May 2022, followed by validation from September 2022 to December 2023. The expert panel included healthcare professionals, public health experts, and researchers. The questionnaire included the following four sections: demographic information, knowledge of GBV, attitudes toward GBV, and GBV-related practices. Results In Round 1, significant revisions were made to enhance relevance and clarity, including the addition of a "Don't Know" option and revisions to questions on gender roles and societal expectations. The quantitative validation of Round 2 revealed high scores for Importance (4.980), Usefulness (4.965), Relevance (4.965), Clarity (4.955), Simplicity (4.980), and Ambiguity (4.815), with all items retained and no significant modifications. In Round 3, consensus was achieved, finalizing the questionnaire with expert validation certificates, demonstrating strong reliability and contextual appropriateness. Conclusions The validated KAP questionnaire is a reliable tool for assessing healthcare providers' capacity to manage GBV. It can be used to inform and enhance interventions aimed at improving GBV management in healthcare settings.

摘要

背景 有效的基于性别的暴力(GBV)干预措施依赖于精确的工具来评估医疗保健提供者的知识、态度和实践(KAP)。本研究旨在使用改良的电子德尔菲法开发并验证一份适合印度医护人员KAP的GBV文化问卷。方法 本研究采用改良的电子德尔菲法,通过在线方式验证一份GBV问卷。该过程包括以下三轮:内容验证、定量验证和定稿。研究于2022年5月开始进行文献综述和问卷起草,随后于2022年9月至2023年12月进行验证。专家小组包括医疗保健专业人员、公共卫生专家和研究人员。问卷包括以下四个部分:人口统计学信息、GBV知识、对GBV的态度以及与GBV相关的实践。结果 在第一轮中,进行了重大修订以提高相关性和清晰度,包括增加了“不知道”选项以及对性别角色和社会期望问题的修订。第二轮的定量验证显示,重要性(4.980)、有用性(4.965)、相关性(4.965)、清晰度(4.955)、简单性(4.980)和模糊性(4.815)得分较高,所有项目均保留且无重大修改。在第三轮中达成了共识,通过专家验证证书完成了问卷定稿,表明其具有很强的可靠性和情境适用性。结论 经过验证的KAP问卷是评估医疗保健提供者管理GBV能力的可靠工具。它可用于为旨在改善医疗保健环境中GBV管理的干预措施提供信息并加强这些措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ffd/11541640/779134a842c4/cureus-0016-00000071060-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ffd/11541640/fac490e57462/cureus-0016-00000071060-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ffd/11541640/779134a842c4/cureus-0016-00000071060-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ffd/11541640/fac490e57462/cureus-0016-00000071060-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ffd/11541640/779134a842c4/cureus-0016-00000071060-i02.jpg

相似文献

1
Enhancing Healthcare Providers' Response to Gender-Based Violence: Development and Validation of an Assessment Tool Using the Modified e-Delphi Approach.加强医疗保健提供者对基于性别的暴力的应对:使用改良电子德尔菲法开发和验证一种评估工具
Cureus. 2024 Oct 8;16(10):e71060. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71060. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
First Data in the Process of Validating a Tool to Evaluate Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Healthcare Providers in Oral Care of Institutionalized Elderly Residents: Content Validity, Reliability and Pilot Study.工具验证过程中的首项数据,旨在评估医疗机构中老年人口腔护理医护人员的知识、态度和实践情况:内容效度、信度和初步研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 14;18(8):4145. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084145.
3
What do we know about assessing healthcare students and professionals' knowledge, attitude and practice regarding female genital mutilation? A systematic review.我们对评估医学生和医疗专业人员关于女性生殖器切割的知识、态度和实践了解多少?一项系统综述。
Reprod Health. 2017 May 22;14(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0318-1.
4
Exploring healthcare professionals' perceptions of artificial intelligence: Validating a questionnaire using the e-Delphi method.探索医疗保健专业人员对人工智能的看法:使用电子德尔菲法验证一份调查问卷。
Digit Health. 2021 Mar 23;7:20552076211003433. doi: 10.1177/20552076211003433. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
5
Understanding the effect of gender-based violence on uptake and utilisation of HIV prevention, treatment, and care services among transgender women: a qualitative study in the greater Kampala metropolitan area, Uganda.理解性别暴力对跨性别女性获得和利用艾滋病毒预防、治疗和护理服务的影响:乌干达坎帕拉大都市区的一项定性研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2023 May 9;23(1):250. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02402-3.
6
Development and validation of nurse's assessment ability questionnaire in delirium subtypes: Based on Delphi expert consensus.基于德尔菲专家共识的谵妄亚型护士评估能力问卷的编制与验证。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 23;19(1):e0297063. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297063. eCollection 2024.
7
Cross-cultural validation and psychometric testing of the French version of the TeamSTEPPS teamwork perceptions questionnaire.跨文化验证和心理计量测试法语版的团队 STEPPS 团队工作感知问卷。
J Health Organ Manag. 2024 Aug 29;38(6):923-941. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2023-0004.
8
The Experiences of Women and Healthcare Providers in Assessing the History of Gender-Based Violence During Perinatal Care.女性和医疗保健提供者在围产期护理中评估基于性别的暴力史的经历。
Violence Against Women. 2022 Nov;28(14):3291-3310. doi: 10.1177/10778012221077125. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
9
The Development of Recommendations for Healthcare Providers to Support Patients Experiencing Medication Self-Management Problems.为医疗服务提供者制定建议以支持有药物自我管理问题的患者的相关进展。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 May 25;11(11):1545. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11111545.
10
Midwife-led pandemic telemedicine services for maternal health and gender-based violence screening in Bangladesh: an implementation research case study.孟加拉国导乐主导的大流行病远程医疗服务在孕产妇保健和基于性别的暴力筛查方面的应用:一项实施研究案例分析。
Reprod Health. 2023 Aug 29;20(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s12978-023-01674-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and early validation of questionnaires to assess system level factors affecting male partners' attendance at childbirth in LMICs.开发和初步验证评估影响中低收入国家男性参与分娩的系统水平因素的问卷。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Apr 17;23(1):258. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05580-y.
2
The Questionnaire of Intention to Help in VAW Cases (QIHVC): Development and preliminary results.《针对暴力侵害妇女案件的帮助意愿调查问卷》(QIHVC):编制与初步结果
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 22;14:1153678. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1153678. eCollection 2023.
3
Knowledge, attitudes and practices of health care providers trained in responding to violence against women: a pre- and post-intervention study.
培训应对针对妇女暴力的卫生保健提供者的知识、态度和实践:一项干预前后研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Nov 1;21(1):1973. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12042-7.
4
Delphi methodology in healthcare research: How to decide its appropriateness.医疗保健研究中的德尔菲法:如何确定其适用性。
World J Methodol. 2021 Jul 20;11(4):116-129. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v11.i4.116.
5
Development of an international sexual and reproductive health survey instrument: results from a pilot WHO/HRP consultative Delphi process.国际性与生殖健康调查工具的制定:来自世卫组织/HRP 磋商德尔菲过程的试点研究结果。
Sex Transm Infect. 2022 Feb;98(1):38-43. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2020-054822. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
6
Exploring healthcare professionals' perceptions of artificial intelligence: Validating a questionnaire using the e-Delphi method.探索医疗保健专业人员对人工智能的看法:使用电子德尔菲法验证一份调查问卷。
Digit Health. 2021 Mar 23;7:20552076211003433. doi: 10.1177/20552076211003433. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
7
Scientific, professional and experiential validation of the model of preventive behaviours at work: protocol of a modified Delphi Study.工作中预防行为模型的科学、专业及经验验证:改良德尔菲研究方案
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 13;10(9):e035606. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035606.
8
Using modified Delphi method to propose and validate the components of a child injury surveillance system for Iran.采用改良德尔菲法提出并验证适用于伊朗的儿童伤害监测系统的组成部分。
Chin J Traumatol. 2020 Oct;23(5):274-279. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2020.08.007. Epub 2020 Aug 22.
9
A modified Delphi study to identify the features of high quality measurement plans for healthcare improvement projects.改良版德尔菲研究,旨在确定医疗改善项目高质量测量计划的特征。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Jan 14;20(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0886-6.
10
Moving forward through consensus: protocol for a modified Delphi approach to determine the top research priorities in the field of orthopaedic oncology.通过共识推进:一种改进的德尔菲法协议,用于确定骨肿瘤学领域的首要研究重点
BMJ Open. 2016 May 24;6(5):e011780. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011780.